96940011 rear O2 sim patch
#40
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Hopefully, this will have a simple answer. I'm having an issue where when I add this to my 96940011 definition file, it doesn't show up in EcuFlash. My Internal ID shows 96940011, my status screen shows "96940011 (79 tables) inheriting evo7base (73 tables)," and I'm putting the new tables at the end of my definition file just above the closing ROM tag.
If I put these tables into my evo7base file, then they show up in EcuFlash, but not if I only do them in the 96940011. I removed it from the base file, because I know that's not right, but I am not sure what other factors could make this not show up. My user level is set to Advanced (also tried Developer), and I checked both boxes for displaying invalid tables and those beyond my user level. None of this makes these show up. IT's as if EcuFlash is not referencing my file, or I've put the code in the wrong place.
If I put these tables into my evo7base file, then they show up in EcuFlash, but not if I only do them in the 96940011. I removed it from the base file, because I know that's not right, but I am not sure what other factors could make this not show up. My user level is set to Advanced (also tried Developer), and I checked both boxes for displaying invalid tables and those beyond my user level. None of this makes these show up. IT's as if EcuFlash is not referencing my file, or I've put the code in the wrong place.
#41
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Whoa, that's wierd. I had made a copy of my old XML file, and just appended a ".old" to it. Apparently, EcuFlash still was using that file even though it has the wrong name just because 96940011 is still at the front. I changed the filename so that "Old." is in front, and then it started referencing my new file. Kinda scary.
Only able to change these tables in Developer mode, but it does work.
Only able to change these tables in Developer mode, but it does work.
Last edited by Warrtalon; Jun 29, 2008 at 02:44 PM.
#42
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
The *ROM*.xml file that ECUFlash uses is not dependent on the file name. It parses each of the files to look for the ROM ID code. The ROM ID tag is in the third line, e.g.,:
<xmlid>96940011</xmlid>
Nothing to do with your problem, but thought I'd mention it so you understand how it works. Using the "Old" at the beginning of the file probably made it come after the new file you're using.
Anyhow, seems that newer versions of ECUFlash have some issues with the tag ["level"=1]. Try changing it to ["level"=2] for each of the entries that makeup this patch.
<xmlid>96940011</xmlid>
Nothing to do with your problem, but thought I'd mention it so you understand how it works. Using the "Old" at the beginning of the file probably made it come after the new file you're using.
Anyhow, seems that newer versions of ECUFlash have some issues with the tag ["level"=1]. Try changing it to ["level"=2] for each of the entries that makeup this patch.
#45
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this available for the IX 88590015?
Edit: I see that ECUFlash 1.38 has the updated .xml tables for the ECU and under the Periphery field is the ECU Peripher0 that can be changed as stated in https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...75&postcount=1.
Since I am running a high flow cat would this eliminate the P0420 or any other cat efficiency CEL, and would this allow me to not have to put the mechanical o2 fix on and still be able to pass emissions?
Edit: I see that ECUFlash 1.38 has the updated .xml tables for the ECU and under the Periphery field is the ECU Peripher0 that can be changed as stated in https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...75&postcount=1.
Since I am running a high flow cat would this eliminate the P0420 or any other cat efficiency CEL, and would this allow me to not have to put the mechanical o2 fix on and still be able to pass emissions?
Last edited by Smoothgangsta; Sep 9, 2008 at 01:25 PM.