Notices
ECU Flash

need help: new xml files for upcoming ECUFlash release

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2008, 09:03 PM
  #61  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
I think its all ok - but some others too check would be good

88580013 and 88580014 are pretty much ready.

al is going to do 88840017

you got 88590013/14/15?

jcs has got 88570008 hopefully..

any others? what about 88840013/14/16
Old May 14, 2008, 10:46 PM
  #62  
Evolving Member
 
al\lupo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a quite ready version (should update to last mrfred's post) for 88840016 and 88840017.
Old May 14, 2008, 11:00 PM
  #63  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 129 Likes on 97 Posts
I just got word that the bit representation syntax is set, so unless anyone has any other changes for the evo9base.xml file, suggest that it become the final for this release of ECUFlash.
Old May 14, 2008, 11:31 PM
  #64  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You rock MrFred!!

I am anxiously awaiting this release...

-E
Old May 18, 2008, 01:17 AM
  #65  
Evolving Member
 
al\lupo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm going to post 88840016 and 17 soon.

An opinion: is there a way to show "Coolant temp scaling" and "IAT scaling" in a better way? In horizontal or vertical it is too long...
Old May 18, 2008, 01:22 AM
  #66  
Evolving Member
 
al\lupo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why in evo9base does "Knock Sensor Filter Map 12" have a "timing" scale? Should it be uint8?
Old May 18, 2008, 01:28 AM
  #67  
Evolving Member
 
al\lupo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Italy
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Attached 88840016 and 17
Attached Files
File Type: zip
88840017.zip (2.2 KB, 12 views)
File Type: zip
88840016.zip (2.2 KB, 13 views)
Old May 18, 2008, 06:51 AM
  #68  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 129 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by al\lupo
I'm going to post 88840016 and 17 soon.

An opinion: is there a way to show "Coolant temp scaling" and "IAT scaling" in a better way? In horizontal or vertical it is too long...
Neither orientation is optimal. Horizontal has the advantage of being able to see the entire table, but pasting data does not work in horizontal format. Vertical has the opposite issues.
Old May 18, 2008, 10:43 AM
  #69  
Evolved Member
 
jcsbanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Done my best with the attached by manually editing your 88590015. There are a lot of differences between JDM and US with maps in one that aren't in others (eg no knock filters, EGR, evap, but twin solenoids, IC, SAS), but I've tried to stick to the style where possible. I haven't had chance to look for your newest boost control stuff, even logging WGDC doesn't work so far on JDM - there are two channels and the code is rather different. I cannot test it in Ecuflash (which is 1.29a anyway) without messing up my installation even by moving and renaming files (I've tried) as I have too much stuff inheriting other stuff and I get loads of parser errors when I try. I hope my weak attempt over the last two hours helps! I cannot put much more into it as I'm packing to move house.
Attached Files
File Type: zip
88570008 mrfred.zip (2.3 KB, 15 views)
Old May 18, 2008, 01:02 PM
  #70  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 129 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by jcsbanks
Done my best with the attached by manually editing your 88590015. There are a lot of differences between JDM and US with maps in one that aren't in others (eg no knock filters, EGR, evap, but twin solenoids, IC, SAS), but I've tried to stick to the style where possible. I haven't had chance to look for your newest boost control stuff, even logging WGDC doesn't work so far on JDM - there are two channels and the code is rather different. I cannot test it in Ecuflash (which is 1.29a anyway) without messing up my installation even by moving and renaming files (I've tried) as I have too much stuff inheriting other stuff and I get loads of parser errors when I try. I hope my weak attempt over the last two hours helps! I cannot put much more into it as I'm packing to move house.
Yeah, there are parse errors where there is no address value. I'll probably comment some stuff out for the time being. Still very handy though. Based on what you have, I think I'm going to reorganize the boost section. I'm going to create a non-JDM and a JDM section.
Old May 18, 2008, 01:03 PM
  #71  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 129 Likes on 97 Posts
tephra, do your ROM files need any updating for the latest evo9base.xml file?
Old May 18, 2008, 02:22 PM
  #72  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 129 Likes on 97 Posts
Another question for you tephra -- In going through jcsbanks IC spray stuff, I noticed that your revised IC spray section left out the following entries that were in the original IC Spray section:

Code:
 <table name="IC Relay Timer ON Mode Switch Time" category="IC Spray" type="1D" scaling="TimeSec"/>

  <table name="IC Relay Timer On Time" category="IC Spray" type="1D" scaling="TimeSec"/>

  <table name="IC Relay Timer Off Time" category="IC Spray" type="1D" scaling="TimeSec"/>
Do these tables not exist in your ROM or all ROMs?
Old May 18, 2008, 04:51 PM
  #73  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
they exist, but I decided to remove them as:
1) will never need to be modified
2) names confuse ppl

i know we want to try and xml as much stuff as possible, but I think in this case less-is-more

I will upload latest 88580013/14 files soon
Old May 19, 2008, 01:28 AM
  #74  
Evolved Member
 
jcsbanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
The On mode switch time is confusing and not necessary, the on/off might be useful to set the effective duty cycle when the spray is active, although I don't think I changed them from stock.
Old May 19, 2008, 05:01 AM
  #75  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
agreed - maybe make them developer options, and rename them to something meaningful?


Quick Reply: need help: new xml files for upcoming ECUFlash release



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:42 AM.