Notices
ECU Flash

how-to: Log AFR from the LC-1 w/o a serial cable

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2008, 11:41 AM
  #121  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
So, it extended the tip further out of the air stream too? That will definitely have a huge effect on the readings. Example being the rear O2 sensor extenders we use to trick the readings going back to the ECU when people run without a catalytic converter. I'm uncertain on it at this point, might work. Having a bung welded 18" down the pipe will cost you about 30 bucks at any muffler shop. Seems the smarter way to go to me.
Old Sep 16, 2008, 02:42 PM
  #122  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
mitsuatb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 492
Received 49 Likes on 39 Posts
Hi,

Did you have a chance to look at this link to the bushing?

http://www.dynotunenitrous.com/store...?idproduct=158

Note that they have a hole in the side and the tip, so the exhaust will flow in and out, not just sit stagnant in a recess.

I would not trust a muffler shop to pull the front under tray. I think that this might be required to reach a point 18" from the tubo, but I might be remembering wrong.

Also I have seen a few posts about damaged WB02, that were down on the bottom side.

Not a cheerleader for this bushing - lot more expensive than $30.00, but it might work without mechanical changes.

What we need is someone that has actually used it to chime in.

Mitsuatb


Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades
So, it extended the tip further out of the air stream too? That will definitely have a huge effect on the readings. Example being the rear O2 sensor extenders we use to trick the readings going back to the ECU when people run without a catalytic converter. I'm uncertain on it at this point, might work. Having a bung welded 18" down the pipe will cost you about 30 bucks at any muffler shop. Seems the smarter way to go to me.

Last edited by mitsuatb; Sep 16, 2008 at 02:46 PM.
Old Sep 16, 2008, 04:03 PM
  #123  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mitsuatb
Hi,

Did you have a chance to look at this link to the bushing?

http://www.dynotunenitrous.com/store...?idproduct=158

Note that they have a hole in the side and the tip, so the exhaust will flow in and out, not just sit stagnant in a recess.

I would not trust a muffler shop to pull the front under tray. I think that this might be required to reach a point 18" from the tubo, but I might be remembering wrong.

Also I have seen a few posts about damaged WB02, that were down on the bottom side.

Not a cheerleader for this bushing - lot more expensive than $30.00, but it might work without mechanical changes.

What we need is someone that has actually used it to chime in.

Mitsuatb
I saw it, and it looks like the tip of the sensor would be much further in so the flow doesn't pass by the sensor tip.

Pull your undertray off before you go to the muffler shop...derr,lol. It takes 5 minutes. You don't have the sensor point DOWN, you have it between 10 o'clock and 2 o'clock so moisture doesn't ruin it. If you tell the muffler shop thats where you want the bung you'll be fine.

You'll honestly get no advantage from having it so close IMO, 18" away is close enough to keep the extreme heat away while still having a fast response time. Just my 2 cents again,lol.
Old Nov 15, 2008, 05:51 PM
  #124  
Newbie
 
j3llyh34d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: England
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anyone done this mod with a car similar to mine? (As per my signature)

I am very keen to do this, and gain an input as I'd like to work towards speed density....

Any advice on sensor selection and wiring on my loom would be appreciated
Old Dec 13, 2008, 02:35 PM
  #125  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
evo8dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sellersville, PA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mrfred
ROM Modifications

My rear O2 sensor simulator code needs to used. This is needed so that the rear O2 ADC input can be made available for the LC-1 analog input.

Option A - tephra ROM

1) Get a copy of tephra's v5+ ROM, and move all your altered tables over to the tephra ROM.

2) In ECUFlash, find the MUT12 address in the MUT table. If the MUT table is not listed, then it will have to be added to your ECUFlash definition file. A thread listing the MUT table definition for most ROMs is *here*. Change MUT12 to 8409. (You'll have to enter it as 0x8409.) Save the ROM and upload it to your ECU.
A few quick questions on this. With regards to the Tephra mod patch for the rear O2 simulator, is it as simple as just enabling the patch in his mods window? With regards to the MUT12 part, which portion (column) of the MUT12 section does the 8409 need to be added as there are 15 columns (0 through F).

Thanks, because I'm sick and tired of dealing with the the serial way of logging. There are always issues with the damn thing.
Old Dec 13, 2008, 02:46 PM
  #126  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
evo8dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sellersville, PA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think I'm just a dumbass on the MUT portion. MUT12 actually means MUT 1 column 2, correct? Still curious about the Tephra simulator portion
Old Dec 13, 2008, 03:27 PM
  #127  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
gsrboi80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On a cliff
Posts: 7,909
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
You are correct Adam just add the 8409 to the mut table. Correct Row 1 (down) Column 2 (over).

Then you need to enable the Tephra Mod option for rear O2 sim to 1

Lastly mod the EVOSCAN or Mitsulogger XML file so that you have a reqest check box in the logger of your choice. I have my NGK logging this way for quite some time now.

Make sure the formula in the line you enter into the XML is correct for what ever wideband you are using
Old Dec 13, 2008, 04:11 PM
  #128  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
i think u will find 8409 is already being logge as MUT3C (the original rear 02 signal)

so where MrFred says MUT12, you can just use MUT3C, and you shouldn't need to change your MUT TABLE..
Old Dec 13, 2008, 05:10 PM
  #129  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
evo8dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sellersville, PA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Awesome thanks guys.
Old Dec 13, 2008, 07:57 PM
  #130  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
gsrboi80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On a cliff
Posts: 7,909
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
i think u will find 8409 is already being logge as MUT3C (the original rear 02 signal)

so where MrFred says MUT12, you can just use MUT3C, and you shouldn't need to change your MUT TABLE..
Just trying to understand. So basically I could have used the "Oxygen Sensor #2" in EVOSCAN to log my wideband and didn't have to mod the XML creating a new request?

3C in my MUT Table shows 88CB. I get lost sometimes
Old Dec 13, 2008, 09:29 PM
  #131  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
with V5.10?

No you should still add your own WB definition in evoscan as you need to do a proper scaling...
Old Dec 14, 2008, 05:56 AM
  #132  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
gsrboi80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On a cliff
Posts: 7,909
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Yes sir V5.10 am I missing something and yup I added the following to the EVO scan Data.XML file

<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Wideband AFR" LogReference="WideBand" RequestID="12" Eval="0.0274*x + 9.0" Unit="AFR" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="22" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="22" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="false" />

Like I said am I missing something. It does work great for logging and is spot on with my gauge in the car
Old Dec 14, 2008, 06:10 AM
  #133  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
if its working then .cool.

dunno, maybe im just tired
Old Dec 14, 2008, 06:20 AM
  #134  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
gsrboi80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On a cliff
Posts: 7,909
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
No doubt boss. If there was a better/more efficient way I be all for it . You guys are the gurus. I just read and read trying to make sense of it all

Thanks tephra
Old Dec 28, 2008, 10:38 AM
  #135  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
evo8dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sellersville, PA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm trying to work in an Uego to be used with this but, I'm having a little difficulty figuring out the Eval formula. Per the documents that come with the Uego under the calibration portion it notes some Cal Table info that is to be inputed into a EMS. The table shows O2 volts/Lamba/Gasoline AFR/various other fuels.

It shows at 0 O2 volts the Gasoline AFR is 10.00 and than at 4.99 O2 volts the Gasoline AFR is 19.98.

It would appear than that the formula for the Uego should be :

(19.98-10.0)/255*x + 9.0 = 0.03914*x + 9.0

Does that look right??


Quick Reply: how-to: Log AFR from the LC-1 w/o a serial cable



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:03 AM.