Notices
ECU Flash

cold start enrichment table

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 30, 2008, 08:20 AM
  #136  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
mplspilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Flyover country.
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have a question: Wouldn't it make more sense to look at all these tables (however you call them — "Primer Enrich" or "IPW adder") with InjectorLatency scaling? Since they add IPW?
So could it be that "Start IPW latency " is the latency that's used when the car is started and depending on temp more latency is added to it (or to regular latency table, since MrFred said this table is only called on Evo 7's) from "start IPW by temp correction" aka "Primer Enrich"?

I'd post some screenshots, but my laptop isn't connected to internet right now...
Old Oct 30, 2008, 12:50 PM
  #137  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 129 Likes on 97 Posts
Originally Posted by mplspilot
I have a question: Wouldn't it make more sense to look at all these tables (however you call them — "Primer Enrich" or "IPW adder") with InjectorLatency scaling? Since they add IPW?
So could it be that "Start IPW latency " is the latency that's used when the car is started and depending on temp more latency is added to it (or to regular latency table, since MrFred said this table is only called on Evo 7's) from "start IPW by temp correction" aka "Primer Enrich"?

I'd post some screenshots, but my laptop isn't connected to internet right now...
The scaling is different than the IPW scaling. I've got most of the formula's worked out, so I can build proper scalings. Just need some time to do it.
Old Dec 11, 2008, 05:41 PM
  #138  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,071
Received 1,056 Likes on 764 Posts
Anyone find the actual correct cranking IPW adder table for 96530006?

I'm finally converting over from 96940011 but I really need a properly defined table for 96530006 for E85 cold starting not to be an issue.

Currently I have this:



Compared to the def for 96940011 it seems wrong:



Also, has anyone found the proper "Base Low Coolant Temp Timing Trim Map #1" and "Percent Low Temp Timing Trim vs Coolant Temp" for 96530006?
Old Dec 11, 2008, 08:05 PM
  #139  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 129 Likes on 97 Posts
I think gear head has has got it in his evo 8 xmls that he made up for me:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...ml#post6431228
Old Dec 11, 2008, 09:07 PM
  #140  
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
scheides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
razorlab, cold start issues on E85? How can you have those....you live in cali! I've had *amazing* results on my car with FIC 1050's on E85. It is also right around 5'F here lately.

One thing I have noticed with the percentage tables is that zeroing them out was almost too much. A few of us here up in the north have reverted to about half of the stock values for a nice medium, the car seems to run better when it's 'that' cold.

+1 for the maps you're asking about though, it would be nice to at least have them if I need them ever
Old Dec 11, 2008, 10:39 PM
  #141  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,071
Received 1,056 Likes on 764 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfred
I think gear head has has got it in his evo 8 xmls that he made up for me:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...ml#post6431228
I can't get those to work correctly but I've had a bit to drink. I will try again tomorrow and report back.
Old Dec 12, 2008, 01:47 AM
  #142  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
KevOVIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by razorlab
I've been changing this table... guess I should change the values back. lol
Old Dec 12, 2008, 04:15 AM
  #143  
Evolved Member
 
Mattjin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That table should only be for the first pulse of fuel. It wont do anything after the motor has actually fired up. The smaller tables (should be 2 of them in that rom), are the ones that should work after the motor is running.

For 96530006 they are at 3732 and 3742. It looks like there are 2 decay maps as well at 3712 and 3722. Not sure what conditions determine which gets used, but try adjusting both.
Old Dec 12, 2008, 04:02 PM
  #144  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Regarding the Post Primer Enrich and Enrich Decay 2D maps, why do we have two (#1 & #2)?

In fact, I notice we have a #1 and #2 for several other maps (e.g. Open Loop Load) and a #1 and #4 for maps like Wastegate Duty, and I am unsure as to why. Anyone?


Lastly, do the "Water Temp Enrich Starting" and "Water Temp Enrich Running" tables not seem somewhat redundant in function to the Primer Cranking Enrich and Post Primer Enrich? Anyone know the difference?

Last edited by Ted B; Dec 12, 2008 at 04:05 PM.
Old Dec 12, 2008, 05:39 PM
  #145  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
KevOVIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mattjin
That table should only be for the first pulse of fuel. It wont do anything after the motor has actually fired up. The smaller tables (should be 2 of them in that rom), are the ones that should work after the motor is running.

For 96530006 they are at 3732 and 3742. It looks like there are 2 decay maps as well at 3712 and 3722. Not sure what conditions determine which gets used, but try adjusting both.
Sorry, but what would the XML be? I followed the same format you had for 94170015 (addresses were the same) and it gave weird numbers. I assume the Engine Temp addresses should be different? Please see attachment.

Thanks in advance.



I put all the stock values back for Cranking Primer (First Pulse) table yesterday night and the car had a really hard time starting up in the morning. I had cold start problems before too... until the values were changed. The table looks different than my old 96940011 ROM, but it seems like that table does help.
Attached Thumbnails cold start enrichment table-primer.png  
Old Dec 12, 2008, 07:15 PM
  #146  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
mplspilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Flyover country.
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ted B

Lastly, do the "Water Temp Enrich Starting" and "Water Temp Enrich Running" tables not seem somewhat redundant in function to the Primer Cranking Enrich and Post Primer Enrich? Anyone know the difference?
It's the same tables, people in this thread just call them different names.

Cranking IPW = Water temp enrich starting
Post primer = Running

Last edited by mplspilot; Dec 12, 2008 at 07:24 PM.
Old Dec 12, 2008, 10:10 PM
  #147  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by KevOVIII
Sorry, but what would the XML be? I followed the same format you had for 94170015 (addresses were the same) and it gave weird numbers. I assume the Engine Temp addresses should be different? Please see attachment.
I get the same thing, and I believe it is correct. The units look like injector pulse width (IPW) in milliseconds (ms).



Originally Posted by mplspilot
It's the same tables, people in this thread just call them different names.
Ah, yes I see that now - same addressses.
Old Dec 12, 2008, 10:38 PM
  #148  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
KevOVIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ted B
I get the same thing, and I believe it is correct. The units look like injector pulse width (IPW) in milliseconds (ms).
The X-axis on your tables look like that too? Why are there underscores?
Old Dec 12, 2008, 10:45 PM
  #149  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Your engine temp scaling is out of whack. I'm using 94170015, and everything appears to be in order.
Old Dec 12, 2008, 11:54 PM
  #150  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
KevOVIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay, I'm confused. Can someone please post the XML for 96530006?


Quick Reply: cold start enrichment table



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:51 PM.