Notices
ECU Flash

Load = performance???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2008, 01:31 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
sponners's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: wales
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Load = performance???

could load readings in evoscan be used to compare one car to another?

eg. 2 evo 6's doing a 3rd gear pull on a straight/flat bit of road.

am I correct in thinking that the higher the load the more power you have?


.....its just that my evo 6 pulled higher loads at 19psi in third gear than a friends tme that was running 23psi
Old May 27, 2008, 01:41 PM
  #2  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
dan l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you have a boost leak that'll happen.
Old May 27, 2008, 01:42 PM
  #3  
G20
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
G20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
usually higher load with minimal knock implies more power but if the MAF/intake air data was messed up (due to bad intake or sensor), it's also result in higher load as well and it'll be wrong for the power calculation.

I helped a friend data logging the car and his loads were abnormal high at high rpm above 6000. I found that he had a "frankerstein" intake (AEM or Injen pipe I'm not sure and HKS filter) that messed up the whole thing. He can't be making over 400 whp as logged by evoscan. :-) LOL.
Old May 27, 2008, 02:05 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
EVIL_EV0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,038
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Weight has alot to do with load.
Old May 28, 2008, 06:04 AM
  #5  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by sponners
could load readings in evoscan be used to compare one car to another? ... am I correct in thinking that the higher the load the more power you have?
You can think of load as torque, or rather, how much air is being combusted per piston stroke. In that regard, you can get an approximate idea of how well you're doing by how much load you're holding.
Old May 28, 2008, 06:50 AM
  #6  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
sponners's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: wales
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ted B
You can think of load as torque, or rather, how much air is being combusted per piston stroke. In that regard, you can get an approximate idea of how well you're doing by how much load you're holding.

yeah thats kinda what I was thinking!


does weight play a part? - trying to get my head around it....I'm thinking if you have more weight then you need more power to move it.....ending up with the same result???......does this make sense?

.....going for a lye down now....me head hurts.....lol

cheers
Old May 28, 2008, 08:35 AM
  #7  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,334
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Something like that, which is why you typically don't see the same load in the lower gears as the higher gears. In the higher gears, there is more resistance working against the car, which drives up exhaust gas temp, which of course spins the turbine faster (which tends to increase load).
Old Jun 8, 2008, 02:33 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Jorge T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hypotetical question with a 9 turbo, what will yield more load in the upper (7300) rpm with all other variables equal (mods, fuel etc):
less boost(19psi) + more timing (16-17*) or More boost (21 psi)+less t( 14-15*)?
Old Jun 8, 2008, 02:52 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
More boost.
Old Jun 8, 2008, 07:28 PM
  #10  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
boost because you are directly affecting the amount of air being pushed into the engine... which is what load is based upon
Old Jun 8, 2008, 07:41 PM
  #11  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
amak87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Simi Valley
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ya. more boost for more torque. and torque is the real power
Old Jun 8, 2008, 07:52 PM
  #12  
fre
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
fre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Timing definitely effects torque. I gained 65ft-lbs of peak torque and 50ft-lbs all the way to redline adding 6 degrees of timing.
Old Jun 8, 2008, 08:26 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Jorge T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by fre
Timing definitely effects torque. I gained 65ft-lbs of peak torque and 50ft-lbs all the way to redline adding 6 degrees of timing.
Please clarify where in the rpm band you added the 6*, at what boost and using what fuel. If I add 6* across the board on 93 oct my engine will spit parts out the tailpipe.
Old Jun 8, 2008, 08:48 PM
  #14  
fre
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
fre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Jorge T
Please clarify where in the rpm band you added the 6*, at what boost and using what fuel. If I add 6* across the board on 93 oct my engine will spit parts out the tailpipe.
I added timing across the board (2-3 degrees), but the peak addition (6 degrees) was done at like 6500k-8500k, where I am when I drag race. I am running 31psi of boost. The reason I did this was because I was running very conservative timing for E85.

I was just trying to point out that adding timing definitely effects torque directly. I am not saying that is an option in your case, if you are already running maximum timing for your setup.

This makes perfect sense, seeing that igniting the fuel earlier would give the mixture more time to burn and therefore produce more force on the power stroke. Timing is degrees before top dead center that the spark plug fires. Too early and you explode while the piston is still traveling up, but too late and you don't burn the fuel efficiently and make less power.

Adding boost will also increase torque though.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eTiLiKo
ECU Flash
0
Jun 13, 2017 03:44 AM
redSLed
ECU Flash
7
Jan 9, 2017 05:22 PM
accident
ECU Flash
2
Apr 7, 2010 06:05 AM
NIevo
ECU Flash
14
Sep 21, 2007 05:12 AM
rt turbo
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
17
Aug 5, 2004 05:37 AM



Quick Reply: Load = performance???



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:47 AM.