Evo 10 - Ecuflash - 3 tables
Jul 11, 2008, 11:44 AM
#136
It will not be $100. With EcuTeK at $750 which does not always include dynotime, it will be a more effective pricing model, faster results, no need to make an appointment and a flat XXX gain in power and tq. The unit will be PNP.
We are putting the X back on the dyno today to try and break the 100whp mark on the ZChip on the stock Evo X.
We are putting the X back on the dyno today to try and break the 100whp mark on the ZChip on the stock Evo X.
Jul 11, 2008, 04:10 PM
#139
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and steve yes dumping 3k+ into suspension and wheels should make it nimbler, but do the same for an 8 or 9 and your back to square one, im saying stock for stock
Jul 11, 2008, 09:50 PM
#140
Evolved Member
iTrader: (77)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Li, NY
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chaz, I'll drive a stock X circles around a stock 8/9. Stock for Stock the X handles better. Research any track time. Other then straight aways, X's do better on the track. The 9 only had them on straights, but then again, I think I remember a test with an evo 6 beating up a 9 on straights too, so newer models losing on straight is nothing new. But as evolution of the evolution keeps goin, newer models handle better. And I'm into suspension and wheels/tires for around 5k sir,
Aug 13, 2008, 04:45 PM
#144
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: all over the world
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aug 13, 2008, 05:10 PM
#148
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: all over the world
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
haha yes
<map name="l" type="1" active="1" help="" class="1" map_struct="" level="0">
<data count="21" offset="#FFFD2" storagetype="uint8" func_2val="[value]" func_val2="[value]" format="%.2f" metric="" caption="" desc="" inc="1" incb="5" incdata="0" incdatab="0" inc_dir="1" cols="1" view="char" color_dir="1"/>
</map>
<map name="l" type="1" active="1" help="" class="1" map_struct="" level="0">
<data count="21" offset="#FFFD2" storagetype="uint8" func_2val="[value]" func_val2="[value]" format="%.2f" metric="" caption="" desc="" inc="1" incb="5" incdata="0" incdatab="0" inc_dir="1" cols="1" view="char" color_dir="1"/>
</map>
Aug 13, 2008, 08:50 PM
#149
Evolving Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you all think the freeware version of IDA4.9 or the trial version of 5.2 would do the job? Not really wanting to spend the money on 5.2 standard without seeing what I'm getting into.
Aug 13, 2008, 10:24 PM
#150
looks like the offset for...
low ign
hi ign
fuel hi
fuel lo
fuel hi 1
fuel lo 1
injector latency
boost cut
are the same as the ones i posted for the EDM rom.
however the mivec, boost wg, boost target tables are all different as well as all the RPM scalings and load scalings.
ign load offset 60f76 elements 22
ign rpm offset 616f4 elements 23
fuel load offset 63cc6 elements 21
fuel rpm offset 63d1e elements 16
injector scaling offset 6512e elements 7
boost cut scaling offset 651ca elements 9
That's what i can find so far in 10 mins... More searching in a bit.
low ign
hi ign
fuel hi
fuel lo
fuel hi 1
fuel lo 1
injector latency
boost cut
are the same as the ones i posted for the EDM rom.
however the mivec, boost wg, boost target tables are all different as well as all the RPM scalings and load scalings.
ign load offset 60f76 elements 22
ign rpm offset 616f4 elements 23
fuel load offset 63cc6 elements 21
fuel rpm offset 63d1e elements 16
injector scaling offset 6512e elements 7
boost cut scaling offset 651ca elements 9
That's what i can find so far in 10 mins... More searching in a bit.
Last edited by EFIxMR; Aug 13, 2008 at 10:50 PM.