Evoscan 2.3 released.
#136
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
By the way, my fuel trims moved on my car!!! I did a log at idle on evoscan and my LTFT lo were at -3.2, which is pretty solid right? I mean it's well within the 5% limit
#138
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So even the LTFT move around that much? I thought only the STFT was there to add/subtract fuel at closed loop
#140
Evolving Member
I realised that the same data set is logging slower in 2.4 than it was in 2.1. Anyone observed the same behaviour? Logger superspeed turned ON on both versions.
v2.1 - cca 170 samples/sec
v2.4 - cca 120 samples/sec
v2.1 - cca 170 samples/sec
v2.4 - cca 120 samples/sec
#143
#148
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
#149
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
I agree with G20, as far as the harsh comments go. He was looking to pirate EvoScan, but that might have simply been because he was unaware that there was a free alternative for those who don't need the bells and whistles EvoScan offers, especially after getting used to the idea of freely-available software with EcuFlash. Hence, my suggestion of Mitsulogger.
Now, if he knew there was a free alternative, and still wanted to pirate someone else's commercial product, then he's just a cheap freeloader. But hey, benefit of the doubt.
Now, if he knew there was a free alternative, and still wanted to pirate someone else's commercial product, then he's just a cheap freeloader. But hey, benefit of the doubt.