Evoscan 2.3 released.
Jul 9, 2008, 08:09 PM
#123
I believe it needs around 16 minutes for each but I'm not certain. I think I recall someone saying the ECU checks the trims every 4 minutes or so and doesn't make the full changes until it sees four blocks of 4 minutes total so you probably don't HAVE to just let your car idle for 16 minutes straight or cruise for more than 16 minutes in one trip. I'm not a pro on the 'trim knowledge' though,lol.
Jul 9, 2008, 11:04 PM
#126
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is having LTFT lo at 3.04 and mid at 2.84 mean that it's really off in Evoscan v2.4? I know in the notes panel it says to have it within 5%, which it is but the idle is really rough and the AEM UEGO reads it full lean and occasionally around 16.x's
These are on PTE 1000cc injectors we installed in a friends car.
Any help would be appreciated
These are on PTE 1000cc injectors we installed in a friends car.
Any help would be appreciated
Jul 9, 2008, 11:07 PM
#127
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those are great trims... BUT, it may not have settled yet...
Usually a lean condition like you describe is a leak somewhere... ( I remember a boost leak is rich and an exhaust leak is lean or vice versa)... Or, your scaling/latencies need a little tweaking.
-E
Usually a lean condition like you describe is a leak somewhere... ( I remember a boost leak is rich and an exhaust leak is lean or vice versa)... Or, your scaling/latencies need a little tweaking.
-E
Jul 10, 2008, 02:42 PM
#135
its 850 I believe. With larger injectors, the lower the IPW is at idle with only the 33(ish) psi at full vacuum it may not be emitting a proper spray pattern to combust properly. I'm sure bumping the idle up 50-100 RPM would help if that is indeed the issue here.