TephraMOD V5.10

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 14, 2008 | 08:58 PM

#466

fixem2

Evolved Member

iTrader: (30)

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 929

Likes: 0

From: USA

Quote:

Originally Posted by tephra

wasn't it:
1.30 and below = little
1.31 and above = big
?

Tephra is right on the above. Made the mistake a couple times so it is burnt into memory!

Reply Like

Oct 15, 2008 | 06:03 AM

#467

mlocatel

Evolving Member

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 127

Likes: 0

From: Europe

Hello Tephra

do we have any chance to get the 88840017?

Thanks

mlocatel

Reply Like

Oct 15, 2008 | 06:18 AM

#468

MR Turco

EvoM Staff Alumni

iTrader: (16)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 3,233

Likes: 3

From: Massachusetts

I should be testing 96420011 on thursday, thanks tephra!

Reply Like

Oct 15, 2008 | 06:36 AM

#469

tephra

Thread Starter

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 66

From: Melbourne, Australia

soon mlocatel

Reply Like

Oct 15, 2008 | 07:36 AM

#470

AlwaysinBoost

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 3,275

Likes: 0

From: In da streetz

ported everything over for the new v5.10 file last night, just haven't had a chance to flash the ECU and test everything out yet. hopefully tonight I'll have some free time.

Reply Like

Oct 15, 2008 | 07:49 AM

#471

MR Turco

EvoM Staff Alumni

iTrader: (16)

Joined: May 2007

Posts: 3,233

Likes: 3

From: Massachusetts

I am working on the 96420011 map and i realized that none of the MAP tables for the JDM MAP definitions are supported. Crap...

Reply Like

Oct 15, 2008 | 03:17 PM

#472

Mellon Racing

Account Disabled

iTrader: (38)

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 9,319

Likes: 1

From: Virginia Beach, Virginia

there seems to be a bug in the definition file for 96530006 for injector voltages I'm getting some crazy numbers:

56.25
65.625
70.3125
75
79.6875
84.375
89.0625

Reply Like

Oct 15, 2008 | 03:43 PM

#473

fixem2

Evolved Member

iTrader: (30)

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 929

Likes: 0

From: USA

Mellon, wierd I did not have that issue when I swapped mine into 96530006. I can post a screen shot of my voltages later.

Reply Like

Oct 15, 2008 | 03:51 PM

#474

logic

Evolved Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 1,022

Likes: 6

From: Berkeley, CA

The EcuFlash definition for 96530006 is wrong for Injector Battery Voltage Latency Compensation. The correct definition for it is:

Code:

<table name="Injector Battery Voltage Latency Compensation" address="37c0">
	<table name="Battery Voltage" address="67f0" elements="7"/>
</table>

Reply Like

Oct 15, 2008 | 05:51 PM

#475

fixem2

Evolved Member

iTrader: (30)

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 929

Likes: 0

From: USA

I have EcuFlash 1.38 and the definition is good. I converted to the 96530006 ROM at version 1.35 and the xml was correct. Wonder if this is older versions only.

Mellon, what Ecuflash version are you using?

Reply Like

Oct 15, 2008 | 10:30 PM

#476

THUB

Evolved Member

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 552

Likes: 0

From: Lombard IL

Quick question with the mod options table where it says "enable alt. maps master? ADC0F=1 autoICS=2" What is ADC0F? Also, this line just enables/disables alternate maps altogether correct?

Reply Like

Oct 16, 2008 | 07:40 AM

#477

Jack_of_Trades

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 3,523

Likes: 2

From: Opelika,AL

Quote:

Originally Posted by THUB

Quick question with the mod options table where it says "enable alt. maps master? ADC0F=1 autoICS=2" What is ADC0F? Also, this line just enables/disables alternate maps altogether correct?

ADC0F means you are using the un-used analog-to-digital input on the ECU harness to switch maps manually rather than use the Intercooler sprayers 'AUTO' mode switch to switch between maps (some cars dont have this luxury). Setting the option to zero disables map switching all together.