disabling lean spool
#1
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
disabling lean spool
Hi Guys,
Now we all know about using the min/max rpms to disable lean spool.
But has anyone found anything about using Periphery 0xFBA bit 0 (ie 0x1) to enable/disable it?
Cheers
David
Now we all know about using the min/max rpms to disable lean spool.
But has anyone found anything about using Periphery 0xFBA bit 0 (ie 0x1) to enable/disable it?
Cheers
David
#2
Evolved Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 730
Likes: 3
From: Lattitude 48.38°, Longitude 17.58°, Altitude 146m = Slovakia, for common dude
If I am not mistaken, Lean spool is there to compensate for EGR solenoid opening,
the EGR can be disabled via bit 12 in Periphery 0 (faa), I cannot confirm that bit 0 of Periphery1 (fba) has this effect.
the EGR can be disabled via bit 12 in Periphery 0 (faa), I cannot confirm that bit 0 of Periphery1 (fba) has this effect.
#3
It does to a certain extent, but it also mess's with the comms to the ecu.
i.e you can't read or clear DTC's.
So I would imagine the same would happen with the 8 and 9 ecu's.
I can't remember if I have tested only changing 0xFBA bit 0 or not though.
#4
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
why FCA?
I tested FBA this morning - no discernible difference between using the RPM method and fba_bit0.
if anyone wants I can post up the XLS with the two logs.
I havn't tested setting the RPM's back to default and using bit0, however the code indicates once you set bit0 the RPM's are no longer even checked.
I think from pure ECU performance perspective we will get more cycles available by disabling FBA bit0.
I tested FBA this morning - no discernible difference between using the RPM method and fba_bit0.
if anyone wants I can post up the XLS with the two logs.
I havn't tested setting the RPM's back to default and using bit0, however the code indicates once you set bit0 the RPM's are no longer even checked.
I think from pure ECU performance perspective we will get more cycles available by disabling FBA bit0.
The following users liked this post:
japspec (Mar 25, 2021)
#6
I have the original mod using addresses 1285 and 1281 documented in PD1's thread. I think I will put it back to stock and just disable it through the periphery bits though.
#7
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
1285 and 1281 are the direct byte addresses for lean spool.
Since all Evo ECU's use words we change that to 1284 and 1280 (using a word size).
Its more consistent and just better...
But yes - I think if we use the FBA bit0 method from now on it will become even simpler.
Since all Evo ECU's use words we change that to 1284 and 1280 (using a word size).
Its more consistent and just better...
But yes - I think if we use the FBA bit0 method from now on it will become even simpler.
Trending Topics
#10
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
Alright - so I changed my rpm's back to default 2500/7000 and left the bit disabled. and my AFR stayed the same.
I think we should make this the preferred method for disabling lean spool.
If anyone else with a 7/8 ROMID wants to give this a go then that would be great
I think we should make this the preferred method for disabling lean spool.
If anyone else with a 7/8 ROMID wants to give this a go then that would be great
#13