Notices
ECU Flash

disabling lean spool

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #1  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
disabling lean spool

Hi Guys,

Now we all know about using the min/max rpms to disable lean spool.

But has anyone found anything about using Periphery 0xFBA bit 0 (ie 0x1) to enable/disable it?

Cheers
David
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 12:04 AM
  #2  
acamus's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 730
Likes: 3
From: Lattitude 48.38°, Longitude 17.58°, Altitude 146m = Slovakia, for common dude
If I am not mistaken, Lean spool is there to compensate for EGR solenoid opening,
the EGR can be disabled via bit 12 in Periphery 0 (faa), I cannot confirm that bit 0 of Periphery1 (fba) has this effect.
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 05:30 PM
  #3  
cossie1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 569
Likes: 1
From: UK
Originally Posted by tephra
Hi Guys,

Now we all know about using the min/max rpms to disable lean spool.

But has anyone found anything about using Periphery 0xFBA bit 0 (ie 0x1) to enable/disable it?

Cheers
David
On an evo 7 ecu, changing the above along with 0xFCA bit 0, doesn't fully disable lean spool.

It does to a certain extent, but it also mess's with the comms to the ecu.

i.e you can't read or clear DTC's.

So I would imagine the same would happen with the 8 and 9 ecu's.

I can't remember if I have tested only changing 0xFBA bit 0 or not though.
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 05:48 PM
  #4  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
why FCA?

I tested FBA this morning - no discernible difference between using the RPM method and fba_bit0.

if anyone wants I can post up the XLS with the two logs.

I havn't tested setting the RPM's back to default and using bit0, however the code indicates once you set bit0 the RPM's are no longer even checked.

I think from pure ECU performance perspective we will get more cycles available by disabling FBA bit0.
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 05:58 PM
  #5  
cossie1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 569
Likes: 1
From: UK
It was something I was told to do, before we found the lean spool start and stop address's.

But as said, it messed with the comms in the ecu, so you couldn't check or clear dtc's.
The following users liked this post:
japspec (Mar 25, 2021)
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 06:35 PM
  #6  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
I have the original mod using addresses 1285 and 1281 documented in PD1's thread. I think I will put it back to stock and just disable it through the periphery bits though.
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 06:46 PM
  #7  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
1285 and 1281 are the direct byte addresses for lean spool.

Since all Evo ECU's use words we change that to 1284 and 1280 (using a word size).

Its more consistent and just better...

But yes - I think if we use the FBA bit0 method from now on it will become even simpler.
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 08:54 PM
  #8  
fixem2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: USA
For the 96530006 ROM I see the Lean Spool bit labelled as Bit 7 in FBA.
Attached Thumbnails disabling lean spool-96530006-fba-periphery.jpeg  
Old Oct 14, 2008 | 09:03 PM
  #9  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
Yeah I queried that in the thread about bit's.

I think its wrong.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 01:07 AM
  #10  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
Alright - so I changed my rpm's back to default 2500/7000 and left the bit disabled. and my AFR stayed the same.

I think we should make this the preferred method for disabling lean spool.

If anyone else with a 7/8 ROMID wants to give this a go then that would be great
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 06:10 AM
  #11  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
and it was definitely bit 0 not 7?
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 06:24 AM
  #12  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
yup. 0x0009 -> 0x0008
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 07:09 AM
  #13  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by tephra
If anyone else with a 7/8 ROMID wants to give this a go then that would be great
I will be disabling my buddy's 8 tonight but it was previously/currently enabled. I cant wait to start from square 1 on the fueling again
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 07:55 AM
  #14  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 130
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by tephra
yup. 0x0009 -> 0x0008
And this will reduce the amount of time the ECU wastes doing calculations that no one uses anyway correct?
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #15  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
yeah...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:40 AM.