TephraMOD V6 - testing!
#392
thanks gearhead, so to recap:
For 96530006:
- you can just plug in a 3bar sensor and not have to change the ECU scalings for MAP sensor (since the ECU isn't aware of the MAP sensor)
- you CAN still do the psi based mod - follow MrFreds instructions for doing so..
Sound right?
For 96530006:
- you can just plug in a 3bar sensor and not have to change the ECU scalings for MAP sensor (since the ECU isn't aware of the MAP sensor)
- you CAN still do the psi based mod - follow MrFreds instructions for doing so..
Sound right?
#395
#396
#397
#399
#403
I'll be trying the 965 rom switch on my car tomorrow after work. I have to do a resistor mod for my rear O2 sensor, but after I do that I'll also try it for an official emissions test too. sorry to take this off topic but does anybody remember off hand which resistor works correctly?
Last edited by THUB; Apr 13, 2009 at 08:59 PM.
#404
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
ok testers - can you let me know if you find the 1% wgdc accuracy worthwhile?
I am thinking of dumping that section of code.
It add's a little bit of complexity and is slower than the original code - so if it's not noticable or anything then I might dump it :|
I am thinking of dumping that section of code.
It add's a little bit of complexity and is slower than the original code - so if it's not noticable or anything then I might dump it :|
#405
Hello Tephra
for me it's not.
Basically there is a minor difference between a 1% and 2% accuracy.
If you can get the code to work faster, that's a small price to pay
for me it's not.
Basically there is a minor difference between a 1% and 2% accuracy.
If you can get the code to work faster, that's a small price to pay