TephraMOD V6 - testing!
. Missing anything else?
May 8, 2009, 04:40 PM
#677
Just got back from testing and I was able to get everything tested. TPS, valet, AutoICS, you name it everything works! 
Dave, quick question, can you add columns to the load scaling? Add more like the 9 has? The 8 only has 19 and the 9 has 21, any chance to make it 21 so we have more load resolution? If it's tough no big deal.....
The only reason I ask is because I am hitting a high load and don't want to loose the low end resolution.
Dave, quick question, can you add columns to the load scaling? Add more like the 9 has? The 8 only has 19 and the 9 has 21, any chance to make it 21 so we have more load resolution? If it's tough no big deal.....
The only reason I ask is because I am hitting a high load and don't want to loose the low end resolution.
May 8, 2009, 04:52 PM
#678
Evolved Member
iTrader: (122)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Coventry, R.I
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh Turco, my buddy Bill (Spins4) will probably come chill with us when you come visit whenever. He just installed a BR Race FMIC and piping and an EVO IX turbo and I ported the turbo, exhaust mani, and O2 housing at my machine shop for him so once we tune it he should be doing pretty well 
Sweet deal 
I convinced Bill to sell the 35R kit since he needed another $1000-$2000 in supporting mods really and he really didnt have that sum of cash. So I told him that 400+whp is still attainable with the IX turbo, Race FMIC and his meth for now, then save for an FP greed or RED down the road with less modding required.
I convinced Bill to sell the 35R kit since he needed another $1000-$2000 in supporting mods really and he really didnt have that sum of cash. So I told him that 400+whp is still attainable with the IX turbo, Race FMIC and his meth for now, then save for an FP greed or RED down the road with less modding required.
May 8, 2009, 04:59 PM
#679
Dave, quick question, can you add columns to the load scaling? Add more like the 9 has? The 8 only has 19 and the 9 has 21, any chance to make it 21 so we have more load resolution? If it's tough no big deal.....
The only reason I ask is because I am hitting a high load and don't want to loose the low end resolution.
The only reason I ask is because I am hitting a high load and don't want to loose the low end resolution.
May 8, 2009, 05:14 PM
#680
Well, I took tried out the v7.5 rom that phemen posted. It started...YAY.
Went for a cruise and got on it, iand the car fell on its face and spitted and sputtered at anything over 1/4 throttle. I compared it to my 9927 rom which runs great, and could not find any differences between the fuel and timing maps, nor any other tables that you would think would effect drivability.
Loaded 9927 back in, and it ran fine.
Any ideas?
Went for a cruise and got on it, iand the car fell on its face and spitted and sputtered at anything over 1/4 throttle. I compared it to my 9927 rom which runs great, and could not find any differences between the fuel and timing maps, nor any other tables that you would think would effect drivability.
Loaded 9927 back in, and it ran fine.
Any ideas?
Last edited by phenem; May 8, 2009 at 05:17 PM.
May 8, 2009, 05:16 PM
#681
So I loaded the evoscan stuff in my data.xml file and then when I went to re-arrange the order it has an error that says "Index was outside the bounds of the array" so I assumed it was a coding mistake so I removed what i added. Now it still says it. It DEFINITELY let me edit the list prior to this cuz I just did it 2 days ago. Any ideas?
May 8, 2009, 05:18 PM
#682
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: maine
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I took tried out the v7.5 rom that phemen posted. It started...YAY.
Went for a cruise and got on it, iand the car fell on its face and spitted and sputtered at anything over 1/4 throttle. I compared it to my 9927 rom which runs great, and could not find any differences between the fuel and timing maps, nor any other tables that you would think would effect drivability.
Loaded 9927 back in, and it ran fine.
Any ideas?
Went for a cruise and got on it, iand the car fell on its face and spitted and sputtered at anything over 1/4 throttle. I compared it to my 9927 rom which runs great, and could not find any differences between the fuel and timing maps, nor any other tables that you would think would effect drivability.
Loaded 9927 back in, and it ran fine.
Any ideas?
May 8, 2009, 05:19 PM
#683
So I loaded the evoscan stuff in my data.xml file and then when I went to re-arrange the order it has an error that says "Index was outside the bounds of the array" so I assumed it was a coding mistake so I removed what i added. Now it still says it. It DEFINITELY let me edit the list prior to this cuz I just did it 2 days ago. Any ideas?
Also every now and then the 1 byte load will jump either really high for 1 data point and go back to normal or really low for 1 data point. Any ideas?
May 8, 2009, 05:21 PM
#684
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: maine
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All I did was copy the high octane fuel and timing maps, maf scaling, and inj scaling from my 9927 rom to this rom. I didn't change anything else
May 8, 2009, 05:34 PM
#686
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: maine
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
May 9, 2009, 03:59 AM
#690
Would this mess it up? I changed the ROM to match EVOScan so they are both 1.3 now.
I am hitting about 320 load and holding 290 by 7k so what would you suggest my 2byte to 1byte load factor be?
Can you provide us with what MUT values we should log for what? I know you have it defined in the first post but I am getting weird values for airflow, its just a static value all the time.....
