Notices
ECU Flash

TephraMOD V6 - testing!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2009, 12:59 PM
  #886  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
fostytou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 3,143
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by phenem
Well now EVOScan is really messing with me. I got it to work but today it is not working. I used to be able to choose the XML / ROM I wanted to use but now I can only pick the ROM. I right click on the graph and it only asks for the ROM not the XML too. Any ideas?

BTW this is EVOScan 2.6 beta 11

I get the same error as before now that I can't select my XML I want to use.

P.S. - how do I set it up so that it is a calculation and not a MUT Request, what post are you referring to?
That tough to look through all 21 posts?

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/7078461-post18.html
Old Jun 4, 2009, 02:31 PM
  #887  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
recompile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Using v6 and ACD0F with HFS-1 without a problem on 88590615
Old Jun 4, 2009, 05:56 PM
  #888  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
phenem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fostytou
That tough to look through all 21 posts?

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/7078461-post18.html
Thanks

All of us get lazy sometimes....
Old Jun 5, 2009, 08:12 AM
  #889  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
evo8dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sellersville, PA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by evo8dad
One question I have is that mrfred's MAT patch - are the values in v7 correct? Previously the values were there but, one had to copy mrfred's values from his patched ROM into a specific ROM in order for it to be enabled. Does this need to be done with v7 in order for the MAT patch to function properly? Or is it simply enabled/disabled by selecting it in the Mods drop down menu (0 = disabled 1 = enabled)??
Bump for this Tephra. It appears as though the MAT feature in v7 has incorrect scalings??
Old Jun 5, 2009, 08:44 AM
  #890  
Evolving Member
 
Biggy VIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 424
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
EDM evo8 96530006.

V7 works fine for me except NLTS. I`m getting consistent knock sum of 30-20 counts on each gear if i use NLTS, since I converted to 96530706, but no knock on regular shifts. Anybody having same problems?

I didnt have any knock on V5.1. Anyway I will check my tranny\motor mounts, downpipe etc... May be it is just pure coincidence...
Attached Thumbnails TephraMOD V6 - testing!-nlts-knock.jpg  
Old Jun 5, 2009, 11:53 AM
  #891  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
fostytou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 3,143
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by phenem
Thanks

All of us get lazy sometimes....
No worries, I was on a rampage from xRoguex. Don't take me too harshly, I only dish the comments to try to make things better. I meant to drop a at the end of the comment... sometimes the sarcasm doesn't bleed through the text as well.
Old Jun 5, 2009, 12:30 PM
  #892  
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
scheides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by evo8dad
I tested it on a '05 that was previously running a 96530006 with your v5.10, than I converted it to 96530706. It entered into the alt map function via the TPS indicated by the CEL light flashing but, I wasn't able to verify through logging that it was indeed referencing the alt maps.
Can you log and test this? I cannot get this to work, I need to know whether I'm crazy or not.
Old Jun 5, 2009, 05:42 PM
  #893  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by evo8dad
Bump for this Tephra. It appears as though the MAT feature in v7 has incorrect scalings??
They should be correct for the GM IAT.

I just use the scalings from the datasheet, whereas MrFred re-structured them to fit into the standard IAT table (which is a lot larger)
Old Jun 5, 2009, 06:20 PM
  #894  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
evo8dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sellersville, PA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tephra
They should be correct for the GM IAT.

I just use the scalings from the datasheet, whereas MrFred re-structured them to fit into the standard IAT table (which is a lot larger)
Thanks
Old Jun 6, 2009, 06:17 AM
  #895  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
evo8dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sellersville, PA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tephra - I noticed in a few logs a difference in MAT readings between using mrfred's patch and using v7. mrfred's patch has MAT readings in the low to mid 80s while v7 has MAT readings in the high 170s to low 180s??
Old Jun 6, 2009, 07:08 AM
  #896  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
can you email me your rom and the log?

and maybe mrfred's version of your rom..
Old Jun 6, 2009, 01:02 PM
  #897  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
fostytou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 3,143
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Is it possible you are looking at *c instead of *F?
Old Jun 6, 2009, 09:13 PM
  #898  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Farmington, NM
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tephra,
I'm having problems with WGDC on 96530706, after upgrading from 94170015 v 5.10.

No matter what I do, I get 0 WGDC until 120 load, then it goes to 100%. I have 100% WGDC under 180 load, so I don't understand why it's not 100%. WTF. It's making my car very laggy and slow to respond. See my attached rom image. I also notice that the logged WGDC is about 15% higher than what is in my base wgdc map. Could this have anything to do with the fact that 03's start with 100% WGDC and 05's start with 0% WGDC? I logged gear, and it is reading the correct gear, but not following the base WGDC maps. FWIW, when I flash back to 94170015 v 5.10 it's back to 100% WGDC from the get go.

Any help is appreciated.

v5.10 on 94170015 rom


v7 on 9653 rom. notice 0 WGDC until 120 load. Yes I know I need to change my 1 byte load factor to stop it from looping.


Log image


My 9653 ROM settings for boost. Bottom 2 labels are WGDC 100% under load and BCLO
Old Jun 6, 2009, 09:21 PM
  #899  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
well the "min load ..." table controls when the WG is first acted upon.

but according to that table it should kick in about 86% load...

so I am not sure whats going on...

can you do a 3rd gear pull from like 1800rpm? i need to see the bottom end of the load + wgdc + rpm + tps
Old Jun 6, 2009, 09:49 PM
  #900  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Farmington, NM
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How's this?



Quick Reply: TephraMOD V6 - testing!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:20 AM.