TephraMOD V6 - testing!
Mar 7, 2009, 05:04 AM
#107
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive just downloaded a V6 rom to have a look at the new mods I cant wait for my rom to be released
Thje in gear boost control looks awesome one thing i noticed is that the rom still includes the BDEL and MWGD tables in the turbo section are these now redundant as surely they would conflict with the new 3d boost tables?
Thje in gear boost control looks awesome one thing i noticed is that the rom still includes the BDEL and MWGD tables in the turbo section are these now redundant as surely they would conflict with the new 3d boost tables?
Mar 7, 2009, 06:25 AM
#109
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought as much, I know you probably have a million requests for new roms to be patched but could you tell me if you will be doing the 96260009 rom for us JDM VIII owners like you did on the V5.10?
Mar 7, 2009, 03:57 PM
#110
Verified that gear based boost changes with different gears on my rom 
I'm just trying to think of something that won't drain my battery when the car isn't on (there is an LED on my switch). Is there a pin on the ECU harness that only has power at the "on" condition but doesn't cut out when cranking?
---Other questions:
Any confirmation that narrowband sim works with V6? It seems to be working swimmingly, but appearances can be deceptive (I didn't know if the code was purposely compatible).
What was the MUT19 change? Was the old MUT40 actually MIVEC (I'm not sure where I got that specific evoscan definition)?
In the table where you set the gear for the rpm/mph can you just change the 6 to a 5 (IE make both of the top two left column numbers 5)so that you don't have to set the 6 values the same as 5? .... or is that and the boost header row only pointing to the same number that displays 6? Would it be easier/work to just set the rpm/mph to 0 for gear 6? (it seemed like I was getting a tiny bit of confusion between 5 and 6 while logging).
Also, can you explain the WGDC vs TPS table and how modifying the values works?
Thanks Tephra
I'm just trying to think of something that won't drain my battery when the car isn't on (there is an LED on my switch). Is there a pin on the ECU harness that only has power at the "on" condition but doesn't cut out when cranking?
---Other questions:
Any confirmation that narrowband sim works with V6? It seems to be working swimmingly, but appearances can be deceptive (I didn't know if the code was purposely compatible).
What was the MUT19 change? Was the old MUT40 actually MIVEC (I'm not sure where I got that specific evoscan definition)?
In the table where you set the gear for the rpm/mph can you just change the 6 to a 5 (IE make both of the top two left column numbers 5)so that you don't have to set the 6 values the same as 5? .... or is that and the boost header row only pointing to the same number that displays 6? Would it be easier/work to just set the rpm/mph to 0 for gear 6? (it seemed like I was getting a tiny bit of confusion between 5 and 6 while logging).
Also, can you explain the WGDC vs TPS table and how modifying the values works?
Thanks Tephra
Last edited by fostytou; Mar 7, 2009 at 04:48 PM.
Mar 7, 2009, 05:45 PM
#111
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Started messing with this yesterday....one thing is my boost error and wgdc correction in evoscan are not correct anymore?
When im at 100% throttle my wgdc correction goes to 16 and boost error goes to 3.0585 in evoscan and dont move until i lift - its like they aren't functioning as they should?
this is on 88590615
When im at 100% throttle my wgdc correction goes to 16 and boost error goes to 3.0585 in evoscan and dont move until i lift - its like they aren't functioning as they should?
this is on 88590615
Mar 7, 2009, 07:02 PM
#112
Verified that gear based boost changes with different gears on my rom
I'm just trying to think of something that won't drain my battery when the car isn't on (there is an LED on my switch). Is there a pin on the ECU harness that only has power at the "on" condition but doesn't cut out when cranking?
I'm just trying to think of something that won't drain my battery when the car isn't on (there is an LED on my switch). Is there a pin on the ECU harness that only has power at the "on" condition but doesn't cut out when cranking?
---Other questions:
Any confirmation that narrowband sim works with V6? It seems to be working swimmingly, but appearances can be deceptive (I didn't know if the code was purposely compatible).
Any confirmation that narrowband sim works with V6? It seems to be working swimmingly, but appearances can be deceptive (I didn't know if the code was purposely compatible).
What was the MUT19 change? Was the old MUT40 actually MIVEC (I'm not sure where I got that specific evoscan definition)?
In the table where you set the gear for the rpm/mph can you just change the 6 to a 5 (IE make both of the top two left column numbers 5)so that you don't have to set the 6 values the same as 5? .... or is that and the boost header row only pointing to the same number that displays 6? Would it be easier/work to just set the rpm/mph to 0 for gear 6? (it seemed like I was getting a tiny bit of confusion between 5 and 6 while logging).
Also, can you explain the WGDC vs TPS table and how modifying the values works?
so say your WGDC table is 75% and you have 50% in the TPS table then your final WGDC will be 50% of 75% ie 37%...
This example is the extreme obviously you TPS correction wouldn't be as low as 50%
Mar 7, 2009, 07:02 PM
#113
Started messing with this yesterday....one thing is my boost error and wgdc correction in evoscan are not correct anymore?
When im at 100% throttle my wgdc correction goes to 16 and boost error goes to 3.0585 in evoscan and dont move until i lift - its like they aren't functioning as they should?
this is on 88590615
When im at 100% throttle my wgdc correction goes to 16 and boost error goes to 3.0585 in evoscan and dont move until i lift - its like they aren't functioning as they should?
this is on 88590615
Mar 8, 2009, 06:58 PM
#117
Dave -- I donated to the fund ...Now where do I find v6 ?? (Is it one of the two 'untested' at the start of the thread? If so, which do I select?
Also, why do you believe the high knock and boost cut could be problematic? Isn't that the best safety feature one could ask for? Thanks
...Now where do I find v6 ?? (Is it one of the two 'untested' at the start of the thread? If so, which do I select? Also, why do you believe the high knock and boost cut could be problematic? Isn't that the best safety feature one could ask for? Thanks
Last edited by cij911; Mar 8, 2009 at 07:05 PM.
Mar 8, 2009, 07:12 PM
#118
Thanks Chris,
your coming from 88590013 yeah? So use 88590015...
boost cut causes a funny condition - where load drops off QUICK but boost is still high in the IM... so you get some funny fueling/timing issues... needs to be tested by some of the more knowledgeable ppl
your coming from 88590013 yeah? So use 88590015...
boost cut causes a funny condition - where load drops off QUICK but boost is still high in the IM... so you get some funny fueling/timing issues... needs to be tested by some of the more knowledgeable ppl
Mar 8, 2009, 09:30 PM
#119
Got the right location, Pin #99 on Evo IX ECU. I think I had previously thought it was permanently on, but maybe I was just being lame about tapping the ECU harness.
http://www.dsm-ezine.com/images/new_...put_evo9v2.bmp
http://www.dsm-ezine.com/images/new_...put_evo9v2.bmp
Mar 9, 2009, 03:40 AM
#120
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello tephra
after 1 week of testing the 88840017 I can feedback that everything seems ok.
I have only remarked a strange effect between the old 5.1 and the 6, namely less fuel consumption.
Might this have something to do with the WGDC 100% limit?
Otherwise it works fine.
One feature did I not test yet, because I don't know what it is: the manifold temperature.
Is it to use with the Speed density patch? If yes, what does happen if I select the option in the Menu?
Thanks
mlocatel
after 1 week of testing the 88840017 I can feedback that everything seems ok
.I have only remarked a strange effect between the old 5.1 and the 6, namely less fuel consumption.
Might this have something to do with the WGDC 100% limit?
Otherwise it works fine.
One feature did I not test yet, because I don't know what it is: the manifold temperature.
Is it to use with the Speed density patch? If yes, what does happen if I select the option in the Menu?
Thanks
mlocatel