Idle timing, vac, ISCV steps, NOx
#1
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Idle timing, vac, ISCV steps, NOx
Increasing idle timing (stock IX engine) from 5 to 17 degrees pulls a stronger vac, sounds better, is more responsive, run fewer ISCV steps.
I didn't go beyond 17 degrees, must be getting near to MBT? Every extra degree did pull a stronger vac. Surprised I didn't get to the point where vac got weaker again. Couldn't hear any detonation.
Downsides? Cat warm up time? NOx emission?
I didn't go beyond 17 degrees, must be getting near to MBT? Every extra degree did pull a stronger vac. Surprised I didn't get to the point where vac got weaker again. Couldn't hear any detonation.
Downsides? Cat warm up time? NOx emission?
#2
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
I have done this on my VIII....for the open loop during warmup. Increased to 12 degrees from 5. Much less stumbling and better driveability
The timing is retarded by the factory to light the cat off quicker, so be aware of that. I have a wrapped DP to help it light off tfaster though.
Probably does mess with the HC and NOx, but my car passes all check very handily
Milburn
The timing is retarded by the factory to light the cat off quicker, so be aware of that. I have a wrapped DP to help it light off tfaster though.
Probably does mess with the HC and NOx, but my car passes all check very handily
Milburn
#3
Evolved Member
My last 4G63 (Twincam Staz) was set to idle in a "well" at 14/15*.
That was where it was happy!
Came as a bit of a shock to see the typical evo idle timing.
jcs, have you found anything resembling cranking timing v temp yet?
That was where it was happy!
Came as a bit of a shock to see the typical evo idle timing.
jcs, have you found anything resembling cranking timing v temp yet?
#5
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
I have my base idle at 8* it seems to do pretty well. I may try increasing it a bit although I don't think it will matter much since the idle timing jumps around a lot because of open loop, er closed loop.....which ever it is.
#7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
He probably has the P0300 code disabled?
Did you have to retune your IVSC tables to prevent a high idle speed? Also, are you just adjusting the base ignition table to acomplish this or is there some idle ignition timing tables?
I adjusted the coolant temp based ignition trim to to reduce the amount it was pulling out by about 5 degrees. It made a huge difference in how well it ran, but it also wants to high idle on cold start now.
Also, are you IX guys running a lot of cam retard at idle?
Did you have to retune your IVSC tables to prevent a high idle speed? Also, are you just adjusting the base ignition table to acomplish this or is there some idle ignition timing tables?
I adjusted the coolant temp based ignition trim to to reduce the amount it was pulling out by about 5 degrees. It made a huge difference in how well it ran, but it also wants to high idle on cold start now.
Also, are you IX guys running a lot of cam retard at idle?
Trending Topics
#8
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
[QUOTE=03whitegsr;6815353]
I adjusted the coolant temp based ignition trim to to reduce the amount it was pulling out by about 5 degrees. It made a huge difference in how well it ran, but it also wants to high idle on cold start now.
[QUOTE]
Could you please show an example?
I adjusted the coolant temp based ignition trim to to reduce the amount it was pulling out by about 5 degrees. It made a huge difference in how well it ran, but it also wants to high idle on cold start now.
[QUOTE]
Could you please show an example?
#11
any reason to go so far! what use is extra vac?
the smoother tickover is a plus it just seems wildly increased from most.
maybe half that would be a nice inbetween?
the smoother tickover is a plus it just seems wildly increased from most.
maybe half that would be a nice inbetween?
#12
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
I was intending to stop if it became rough, knocked or the vacuum weakened, but I didn't reach that point and stopped at 17 for no particular reason other than I got the hint I might be nearing MBT.
We could rephrase the "use of the extra vac" question, and ask what is the point in the extra air and fuel you need to make it idle with less timing? I can only think of NOx. Uncertainty was the reason I posted.
12 would probably be good, since many use that and it was enough to make it smoother and crisper off idle.
I was happy with the idle before, I just thought I would play with the live mapping, I wouldn't have wasted flashes on it otherwise since I was happy, although having tried more I prefer it.
We could rephrase the "use of the extra vac" question, and ask what is the point in the extra air and fuel you need to make it idle with less timing? I can only think of NOx. Uncertainty was the reason I posted.
12 would probably be good, since many use that and it was enough to make it smoother and crisper off idle.
I was happy with the idle before, I just thought I would play with the live mapping, I wouldn't have wasted flashes on it otherwise since I was happy, although having tried more I prefer it.
#14
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
John,
The live mapping was something I was definitely looking forward to as a major mod to various ROMs, since I was so used to it with DSMLink. I wonder why it never caught on. If I were good enough to implement it, I would have already.
I think that is part of the reason why I don't tune or mess around with my car that much...I just hate the hassle of reflashing for every little change.
Eric
The live mapping was something I was definitely looking forward to as a major mod to various ROMs, since I was so used to it with DSMLink. I wonder why it never caught on. If I were good enough to implement it, I would have already.
I think that is part of the reason why I don't tune or mess around with my car that much...I just hate the hassle of reflashing for every little change.
Eric
#15
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
The trouble is it is so complex! I've simplified the programming so now all the assembly is in one file, the routines are mainly interrupt driven and the vectors are the same between all the SH2 ECUs, it is really just putting in the variable locations for different ROM, and there are about a dozen instruction changes and hooks which are not too bad now. But now with map tracing and SD, and a plethora of xmls floating about, version control and support are the biggest issues.
Even a guy who managed to do a 2.3 GT35R on SD without too much trouble and has mapped over a hundred Evos on the stock ECU is going to leave playing with it until he comes to see me this week so I can demonstrate it in person. It really isn't difficult once you know how, but in adding features and flexibility I think it has scared people off. Now you can map trace the max knock over the ignition map and adjust the ignition map on the fly, all in one application. Not done the same for fuelling as I don't run a permanent WB that is ECU logged, but it could be added. Maybe this guy will help me work out how to explain things better when we see how he takes to it.
Even a guy who managed to do a 2.3 GT35R on SD without too much trouble and has mapped over a hundred Evos on the stock ECU is going to leave playing with it until he comes to see me this week so I can demonstrate it in person. It really isn't difficult once you know how, but in adding features and flexibility I think it has scared people off. Now you can map trace the max knock over the ignition map and adjust the ignition map on the fly, all in one application. Not done the same for fuelling as I don't run a permanent WB that is ECU logged, but it could be added. Maybe this guy will help me work out how to explain things better when we see how he takes to it.
Last edited by jcsbanks; Mar 16, 2009 at 01:21 PM.