Notices

Evo X Logging

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:09 PM
  #271  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by GTR2009
Is there any logging software which can log the knock, EGT and boost on X ? because evoscan 2.6 beta11 can't
2.6 beta 14 using Mode23 for boost & knock, read this thread from the begining for details. EGT, you'll need an exernal EGT sensor to log.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:10 PM
  #272  
LaXGSR's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by SiC
This IAT is the Manifold temp and my MUT is correct, I crossed them against temps taken by OBD2 loggers.

I used old Evo 9 MUT tables to get some address but they are not always correct on the X. The IAT & ECT both were different MUTs on the 9 vs X.
Cool, thanks again!!! So is there any MUT reference the common person like myself could use to figure out the correct address for various parameters? Or will we just have to rely on geniuses like you
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:20 PM
  #273  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by LaXGSR
Cool, thanks again!!! So is there any MUT reference the common person like myself could use to figure out the correct address for various parameters? Or will we just have to rely on geniuses like you
I'm no genius, I'm a hit & miss type. tephra & hamish probably have the whole MUT table in their head hehe
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #274  
LaXGSR's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by SiC
I'm no genius, I'm a hit & miss type. tephra & hamish probably have the whole MUT table in their head hehe
Either way works

Minor correction to your formula I believe.

Since the value returned minus 40 is the temp in celcius, I think we should be doing: (x-40)*1.8+32 instead of (x*1.8)-40. Does this seem right?

<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Mode23 IAT" LogReference="Mode23IAT" RequestID="2380863f" Eval="(x-40)*1.8+32" Unit="Deg F" MetricEval="x-40" MetricUnit="Deg C" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:31 PM
  #275  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by LaXGSR
Either way works

Minor correction to your formula I believe.

Since the value returned minus 40 is the temp in celcius, I think we should be doing: (x-40)*1.8+32 instead of (x*1.8)-40. Does this seem right?

<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Mode23 IAT" LogReference="Mode23IAT" RequestID="2380863f" Eval="(x-40)*1.8+32" Unit="Deg F" MetricEval="x-40" MetricUnit="Deg C" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
That's what I wrote at first and edited it since the calculation came out correct with less numbers. Try 0 degree celsius & 100 degrees celcius with my figures, it should still come out as 32F & 212F.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:32 PM
  #276  
GTR2009's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Romania
Originally Posted by SiC
2.6 beta 14 using Mode23 for boost & knock, read this thread from the begining for details. EGT, you'll need an exernal EGT sensor to log.
why? evo X does not have an EGT sensor ?
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #277  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by GTR2009
why? evo X does not have an EGT sensor ?
No and neither did any of the previous Evos........ or your handle 2009 GTR
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #278  
criptballer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Utah
does mode23 only log a certain boost? if so, that means it's only going to log a certain percentage of load correct? I did a log and it said my peak was 20 but i'm running 25.....
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #279  
LaXGSR's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by SiC
That's what I wrote at first and edited it since the calculation came out correct with less numbers. Try 0 degree celsius & 100 degrees celcius with my figures, it should still come out as 32F & 212F.
(x-40)*1.8+32:
0 C = -40F
100 C = 140F
70 C = 86 F

(x*1.8)-40:
0 C = =40F
100 C = 140 F
70 C = 86 F

Ah I see what you did. If you take the first formula, you can translate it to 1.8*x-(1.8*40)+32 = 1.8*x -72 + 32 = 1.8*x-40. Forgive my ignorance...I should have worked out that simple math formula...
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:43 PM
  #280  
LaXGSR's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by criptballer
does mode23 only log a certain boost? if so, that means it's only going to log a certain percentage of load correct? I did a log and it said my peak was 20 but i'm running 25.....
Mode 23 boost logging certainly can read up to 30 psi, so it's strange that you say you're capped at 20. Are you sure you are really running 25 psi? Make sure you are using the right config file too.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:43 PM
  #281  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by LaXGSR
(x-40)*1.8+32:
0 C = -40F
100 C = 140F
70 C = 86 F

(x*1.8)-40:
0 C = =40F
100 C = 140 F
70 C = 86 F

Ah I see what you did. If you take the first formula, you can translate it to 1.8*x-(1.8*40)+32 = 1.8*x -72 + 32 = 1.8*x-40. Forgive my ignorance...I should have worked out that simple math formula...
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:51 PM
  #282  
criptballer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Originally Posted by LaXGSR
Mode 23 boost logging certainly can read up to 30 psi, so it's strange that you say you're capped at 20. Are you sure you are really running 25 psi? Make sure you are using the right config file too.
how can i make sure i have the correct one? do you have the correct one for ROM ID USDM ending in 15?
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:56 PM
  #283  
LaXGSR's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by criptballer
how can i make sure i have the correct one? do you have the correct one for ROM ID USDM ending in 15?
Just grab the file in the first post with your rom id, and rename it to config.txt. That's the one that works for me. Or if you are using evoscan, then get the USDM Data.xml file that SiC posted earlier. Also, you have to make the 3 changes to your ROM before you can log with mode23.
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 08:58 PM
  #284  
criptballer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Utah
yeah i'm using evoscan and i did all that. so i don't know why it would only read 20 psi. i'll do another run and see what it says. thanks
Old Jun 13, 2009 | 09:02 PM
  #285  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
for criptballer

Can someone post a virgin 52680018 for criptballer? I have a feeling his ROM maybe some what corrupted (some values may have been changed by mistake) and he should probably be running 52680018 since it's a newer revision.


Quick Reply: Evo X Logging



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:17 AM.