Evo X Logging
#271
#272
Cool, thanks again!!! So is there any MUT reference the common person like myself could use to figure out the correct address for various parameters? Or will we just have to rely on geniuses like you
#273
I'm no genius, I'm a hit & miss type. tephra & hamish probably have the whole MUT table in their head hehe
#274
Minor correction to your formula I believe.
Since the value returned minus 40 is the temp in celcius, I think we should be doing: (x-40)*1.8+32 instead of (x*1.8)-40. Does this seem right?
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Mode23 IAT" LogReference="Mode23IAT" RequestID="2380863f" Eval="(x-40)*1.8+32" Unit="Deg F" MetricEval="x-40" MetricUnit="Deg C" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
#275
Either way works
Minor correction to your formula I believe.
Since the value returned minus 40 is the temp in celcius, I think we should be doing: (x-40)*1.8+32 instead of (x*1.8)-40. Does this seem right?
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Mode23 IAT" LogReference="Mode23IAT" RequestID="2380863f" Eval="(x-40)*1.8+32" Unit="Deg F" MetricEval="x-40" MetricUnit="Deg C" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Minor correction to your formula I believe.
Since the value returned minus 40 is the temp in celcius, I think we should be doing: (x-40)*1.8+32 instead of (x*1.8)-40. Does this seem right?
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Mode23 IAT" LogReference="Mode23IAT" RequestID="2380863f" Eval="(x-40)*1.8+32" Unit="Deg F" MetricEval="x-40" MetricUnit="Deg C" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
#276
#279
0 C = -40F
100 C = 140F
70 C = 86 F
(x*1.8)-40:
0 C = =40F
100 C = 140 F
70 C = 86 F
Ah I see what you did. If you take the first formula, you can translate it to 1.8*x-(1.8*40)+32 = 1.8*x -72 + 32 = 1.8*x-40. Forgive my ignorance...I should have worked out that simple math formula...
#280
Mode 23 boost logging certainly can read up to 30 psi, so it's strange that you say you're capped at 20. Are you sure you are really running 25 psi? Make sure you are using the right config file too.
#281
(x-40)*1.8+32:
0 C = -40F
100 C = 140F
70 C = 86 F
(x*1.8)-40:
0 C = =40F
100 C = 140 F
70 C = 86 F
Ah I see what you did. If you take the first formula, you can translate it to 1.8*x-(1.8*40)+32 = 1.8*x -72 + 32 = 1.8*x-40. Forgive my ignorance...I should have worked out that simple math formula...
0 C = -40F
100 C = 140F
70 C = 86 F
(x*1.8)-40:
0 C = =40F
100 C = 140 F
70 C = 86 F
Ah I see what you did. If you take the first formula, you can translate it to 1.8*x-(1.8*40)+32 = 1.8*x -72 + 32 = 1.8*x-40. Forgive my ignorance...I should have worked out that simple math formula...
#282
how can i make sure i have the correct one? do you have the correct one for ROM ID USDM ending in 15?
#283
Just grab the file in the first post with your rom id, and rename it to config.txt. That's the one that works for me. Or if you are using evoscan, then get the USDM Data.xml file that SiC posted earlier. Also, you have to make the 3 changes to your ROM before you can log with mode23.
#285
for criptballer
Can someone post a virgin 52680018 for criptballer? I have a feeling his ROM maybe some what corrupted (some values may have been changed by mistake) and he should probably be running 52680018 since it's a newer revision.