Notices

Evo X Logging

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 02:55 PM
  #391  
xbox4414's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Mtz, CA
So question, I may be a few weeks behind, but did the cap in PCMScan on boost get resolved then?
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 03:06 PM
  #392  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by xbox4414
So question, I may be a few weeks behind, but did the cap in PCMScan on boost get resolved then?
You have to log Mode23 either with the Tephra logger or Evoscan to get the uncapped boost. I do not know if flashing the rom with Mode23 code would uncap the boost limit using PCMScan. I will try it on Saturday and report back.
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 05:23 PM
  #393  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
no it doesn't

the OBD spec calls for a max of 255 kPa - hence the cap.

With Mode23, we are logging the raw MAP signal - hence we don't get capped...
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 05:53 PM
  #394  
xbox4414's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Mtz, CA
What does it do that? Anyway to change that? I like using your data logger, but it doesn't create a nice map graph. Haven't figured how how to do that in Excel. And I don't have EvoScan yet...
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 06:34 PM
  #395  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
change what? the cap in pcmscan?

i could - but im not going to...

get evoscan
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 06:38 PM
  #396  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
What is the CAN ID for boost logging in EvoScan Beta anyways? Or are we only able to use Mode23 at this time? It seems like the Baro caps at 125 kPa (~3.6 psi above Atmospheric) but is still a good way to verify the readings. Even if I can get to 255 kPa that is 22.5 psi and I can time spoolup more accurately.

Thanks!
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 06:42 PM
  #397  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
Code:
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="MAP" LogReference="MAP" RequestID="CAN6-0" Eval="x" Unit="%" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #398  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by criptballer
Hey mrfred, how do i convert the IPW into IDC? that way i'm going to be able to see at what point they max out right?
Input this into your Evoscan data.xml

<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="IDC" LogReference="IDC" RequestID="2380874f" Eval="[Mode23IPW]*31.25*x/1200" Unit="%" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="100" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="100" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #399  
NMX's Avatar
NMX
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by Hiboost
What is the CAN ID for boost logging in EvoScan Beta anyways? Or are we only able to use Mode23 at this time? It seems like the Baro caps at 125 kPa (~3.6 psi above Atmospheric) but is still a good way to verify the readings. Even if I can get to 255 kPa that is 22.5 psi and I can time spoolup more accurately.

Thanks!
I could be wrong but I want to say that I tested this out with CAN 6-0 and it caps at 255 very easily at part throttle. I think the problem is that it looked like it was reporting absolute pressure, so 22.5-14.5=8 psi. Try it out, but I couldn't really get usable boost logging with CAN. The mode23 boost logging works great though!
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 09:16 PM
  #400  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 130
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
My latest Data.xml for USDM Evo 10 GSR 52680015-20 is attached. Changes include:

- APP and TPS now should be range from ~0 to ~100%.
- Added IDC calculation.
- Added back the wide band logging entry.
- A few other minor changes.
Attached Files
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 09:21 PM
  #401  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 130
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by SiC
mrfred, do you have the MUT addresses for these instead of the raw addresses. I'm having a hard time finding them for the JDM 52360018.
Yeah, some of these are not in the MUT table, but something close might be in there that you can use as a reference point to get the correct address. Which items are you looking to duplicate in your Data.xml?

Originally Posted by Hiboost
What is the CAN ID for boost logging in EvoScan Beta anyways? Or are we only able to use Mode23 at this time? It seems like the Baro caps at 125 kPa (~3.6 psi above Atmospheric) but is still a good way to verify the readings. Even if I can get to 255 kPa that is 22.5 psi and I can time spoolup more accurately.

Thanks!
Forget the CAN method. All problems are solved with Mode23.
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #402  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by NMX
I could be wrong but I want to say that I tested this out with CAN 6-0 and it caps at 255 very easily at part throttle. I think the problem is that it looked like it was reporting absolute pressure, so 22.5-14.5=8 psi. Try it out, but I couldn't really get usable boost logging with CAN. The mode23 boost logging works great though!
Yeah I have Baro the same as 6-0 so it will cap out at 125 kPa, Mode23 it is!
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 10:49 PM
  #403  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by mrfred
Yeah, some of these are not in the MUT table, but something close might be in there that you can use as a reference point to get the correct address. Which items are you looking to duplicate in your Data.xml?



Forget the CAN method. All problems are solved with Mode23.
Looking for some addresses for JDM 52360018.
- APP & TPS
- The 2 other loads (Mivec & timing)
- Manifold air temp (Charged air temp)

I think I have the AFR map which is 238088f0

Also, these should be the mivec on the JDM
Code:
        <DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="InVVT" LogReference="InVVT" RequestID="23809450" Eval="(x-3552)/48.64+10" Unit="Deg" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="2" GaugeMin="-40" GaugeMax="50" ChartMin="-40" ChartMax="50" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
        <DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="ExVVT" LogReference="ExVVT" RequestID="23809452" Eval="(x-4096)*-0.01953" Unit="Deg" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="2" GaugeMin="-40" GaugeMax="50" ChartMin="-40" ChartMax="50" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 11:03 PM
  #404  
xbox4414's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
From: Mtz, CA
Originally Posted by tephra
change what? the cap in pcmscan?

i could - but im not going to...

get evoscan
Why?!? No fair! LOL. I paid for PCMScan I don't wanna get EvoScan too. Haha.
Old Jun 18, 2009 | 11:19 PM
  #405  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by xbox4414
Why?!? No fair! LOL. I paid for PCMScan I don't wanna get EvoScan too. Haha.
I think alot of us used/paid for PCMScan when we had no other option, it's time to let go......


Quick Reply: Evo X Logging



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:31 AM.