Notices

Evo X Logging

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 12:21 AM
  #661  
tokeone's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
From: so cal
has anyone logged with beta 18?

i attempted to with the following settings (2 pulls)
openport2.0, can2006+/evox, injector scaling: 513, mode23 usa evox, odbiiefi

coolanttemp, gear in use, baro, battery, lc-1 afr, and external wideband were the only unchecked boxes.

and only got 3 rows
example:
logentryseconds
8.8
19.69
28.4


anyone know why that would happen?
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 12:28 AM
  #662  
evo4mad's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 723
Likes: 1
From: TGA, New Zealand
you have pm, I can help you out.

Last edited by evo4mad; Jul 28, 2009 at 12:51 AM.
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 05:56 AM
  #663  
newcomer81's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 314
Likes: 1
From: Norfolk VA
i can verify 18 works great. i am now working through which values to not log to increase the number of logs/sec i can get.
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 06:14 AM
  #664  
evo4mad's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 723
Likes: 1
From: TGA, New Zealand
29th July 2009: EvoScan v2.6 Beta19 released!
Download EvoScan Beta19 here(registered users only. Unregistered users get your registration number from www.evoscan.com)
- Removed some beta testing code, logging speed increased 10 fold.
- Updated Rear02Sensor LC1AFR mode23 address for USDM EvoX and USDM RA EvoX
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 06:20 AM
  #665  
newcomer81's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 314
Likes: 1
From: Norfolk VA
Originally Posted by newcomer81
i can verify 18 works great. i am now working through which values to not log to increase the number of logs/sec i can get.
Originally Posted by evo4mad
logging speed increased 10 fold.
well never mind then...

you sir, rock. thanks!
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 06:31 AM
  #666  
SiC's Avatar
SiC
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: Kanagawa, Japan
Originally Posted by newcomer81
well never mind then...

you sir, rock. thanks!
Yeah, it was a bug I noticed and Hamish fixed it right away
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 09:26 AM
  #667  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Originally Posted by LaXGSR
Are you able to log load and boost through the ECU without mode23? I didn't think the CAN ID's worked yet?
nope, I don't need either of those to tune though.
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 11:53 AM
  #668  
tokeone's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
From: so cal
hamish - id totally take you up on your offer for help, because id love to learn more... but i have xp x64 which isnt supported by msn messanger (very nice of them to only support x64 on vista and windows7)

however, i have beta 19 and it worked without issue when i logged this morning.
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 04:50 PM
  #669  
newcomer81's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 314
Likes: 1
From: Norfolk VA
using beta 19 i logged every parameter except for LC-1 AFR (i use aem) and i was averaging 0.307 seconds between entries. last night with beta 18 i was getting 0.475
a good 35% increase in sample rate. I'll try to remove some parameters and see what i get tonight if the wifey will let me out of the house

vista32, 2GHz core 2, 3gb ram
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 03:26 PM
  #670  
Excalibur's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: Abiline/Converse, TX
I have the AEM UEGO and was wondering if for tuning via ecuflash/evoscan I should add another wideband for use with tuning whereas the other is for the gauge?
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 03:53 PM
  #671  
xPRimNT's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Originally Posted by Excalibur
I have the AEM UEGO and was wondering if for tuning via ecuflash/evoscan I should add another wideband for use with tuning whereas the other is for the gauge?

Nah, the UEGO works great for logging.

Although, the LC-1 seems to have a bonus feature of being able to hook into the original Rear O2 Harness (which would be nice for moving car-to-car). If you already have a UEGO, just hook it up to a serial to USB adapter and log away!
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 03:59 PM
  #672  
coevolve's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Although, the LC-1 seems to have a bonus feature of being able to hook into the original Rear O2 Harness (which would be nice for moving car-to-car). If you already have a UEGO, just hook it up to a serial to USB adapter and log away!
can someone confirm this as a fact?
If so, that's awesome! I have an LC-1 but had to cut off the sensor on a previous vehicle...
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 04:17 PM
  #673  
nitz's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: MIA
Is there a reason the LC-1 AFR option is not available for the JDM RS EVO X? Is the address unknown? There is a post catalytic OEM sensor in place. Also what about the trims since I'd like to have that in order to scale the injectors correctly rather than just plugging in the most common settings used(Deatchwerks 800cc)

Originally Posted by evo4mad
29th July 2009: EvoScan v2.6 Beta19 released!
Download EvoScan Beta19 here(registered users only. Unregistered users get your registration number from www.evoscan.com)
- Removed some beta testing code, logging speed increased 10 fold.
- Updated Rear02Sensor LC1AFR mode23 address for USDM EvoX and USDM RA EvoX

Last edited by nitz; Jul 30, 2009 at 04:20 PM.
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 04:43 PM
  #674  
xPRimNT's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Originally Posted by coevolve
can someone confirm this as a fact?
If so, that's awesome! I have an LC-1 but had to cut off the sensor on a previous vehicle...
I was basing that off what I had picked up from tephra's comments. I've not done it myself, but had I known before I got my UEGO, I'd definitely have picked up the LC-1!

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/7332340-post61.html



Though, I'm curious now. The AEM UEGO has an analog output, could that be worked into the same thing as the LC-1? That is, get the analog output into the D35 connector (yellow wire) under the seat, then get it read through the ECU?

Last edited by xPRimNT; Jul 30, 2009 at 04:47 PM.
Old Jul 30, 2009 | 05:03 PM
  #675  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 66
From: Melbourne, Australia
most widebands have an analogue output - so they can all hook into the rear02.

its nothing more than logging the wideband via the ECU... one less cable

this was a big advantage for the LC1 where the serial cable introduced errors and so removing it made life a LOT easier


Quick Reply: Evo X Logging



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:09 AM.