Virtual Dyno Room-Dyno Simulator
Jun 20, 2009, 09:23 PM
#91
this is my ix mr with stock o2 housing, stock downpipe, 2.5 inch test pipe, stock catback, k&n drop-in, ecu controlled boost 21psi tapering to 18psi, and self-tune. base pull is my car, and the comparison pull is the standard numbers that come in the excel file. also, i can't wait til morning for the auto-x with it
Last edited by evo8426; Jun 20, 2009 at 09:48 PM.
Jun 21, 2009, 10:26 AM
#92
Well, some good news. The next revision will have increased resolution from 250 RPM increments to 100 RPM increments and display RPM ranges from 2500-10,000 RPM and the graph will autosize to fit the pull you loaded. I may add a tire diameter calculator to the program too so users can quickly estimate their tire diameter from their tire size. Just need some more time to convert all of the formula's. Maybe a day or two.
Before anyone asks, I was going to have it do it in 50 RPM increments but it makes the amount of smoothing required just way too involved with VERY little improvement to the results....very little. At 100 RPM the resolution is already two and a half times better than v5.2 is now.
The beauty of this new setup is that it should work with all file sizes still but you will benefit by doing things to increase the resolution of your datalog.
Before anyone asks, I was going to have it do it in 50 RPM increments but it makes the amount of smoothing required just way too involved with VERY little improvement to the results....very little. At 100 RPM the resolution is already two and a half times better than v5.2 is now.
The beauty of this new setup is that it should work with all file sizes still but you will benefit by doing things to increase the resolution of your datalog.
Last edited by Colt4g63; Jun 21, 2009 at 10:28 AM.
Jun 21, 2009, 10:33 AM
#94
Yea 3rd gear is EVO 8 gearing. The car has 18s on it but if i ever put a bigger tire or wheel size in DLL it would go off, read too high and not be accurate with the Dyno jet i dyno my car on... so i always put in stock wheel and tire size for it to be correct.
Jun 21, 2009, 11:04 AM
#95
Well thats where the 'User Correction Adjustment' comes into play. Its always best to enter in all of the TRUE data for your vehicle. I just realized that the tire diameter on my simulator only worked when in the 'User Option' so I am presently fixing that.
Jun 21, 2009, 11:09 AM
#96
this is my ix mr with stock o2 housing, stock downpipe, 2.5 inch test pipe, stock catback, k&n drop-in, ecu controlled boost 21psi tapering to 18psi, and self-tune. base pull is my car, and the comparison pull is the standard numbers that come in the excel file. also, i can't wait til morning for the auto-x with it
Jun 21, 2009, 11:50 AM
#97
im using a mivec map that is very similar to what nj1266 uses, with a 12-11.5 spool up and 11.5-11.2 from spool up to redline for afr, sometimes it runs 2 or 3 degrees at peak and see's 13-14 degrees by redline. it pretty much stays in the 250/260 load range 3500-6000 and drops down to 230 by redline. any suggestions on what needs a little work on the tune?
Jun 21, 2009, 11:56 AM
#99
im using a mivec map that is very similar to what nj1266 uses, with a 12-11.5 spool up and 11.5-11.2 from spool up to redline for afr, sometimes it runs 2 or 3 degrees at peak and see's 13-14 degrees by redline. it pretty much stays in the 250/260 load range 3500-6000 and drops down to 230 by redline. any suggestions on what needs a little work on the tune?
Jun 21, 2009, 12:16 PM
#102
Sometimes the 'smoothing' formulas will create an 'upward' curve in the last 250 RPM which was caused by the averaging in the math. The newesr version I will be releasing uses a totally different approach and will minimize these errors by a great deal. My brain is MUSH right now from looking at all of these elaborate formulas I'm implenting lol.
I will definitely need some hardcore beta testing of all of the features by you guys cuz it will be very easy for me to make a mistake now that its getting so involved.
I will definitely need some hardcore beta testing of all of the features by you guys cuz it will be very easy for me to make a mistake now that its getting so involved.
Jun 21, 2009, 12:58 PM
#103
Sometimes the 'smoothing' formulas will create an 'upward' curve in the last 250 RPM which was caused by the averaging in the math. The newesr version I will be releasing uses a totally different approach and will minimize these errors by a great deal. My brain is MUSH right now from looking at all of these elaborate formulas I'm implenting lol.
I will definitely need some hardcore beta testing of all of the features by you guys cuz it will be very easy for me to make a mistake now that its getting so involved.
I will definitely need some hardcore beta testing of all of the features by you guys cuz it will be very easy for me to make a mistake now that its getting so involved.