TephraMod V7

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 20, 2009 | 11:11 PM

#586

tephra

Thread Starter

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 66

From: Melbourne, Australia

yeh same problem...

Reply Like

Oct 20, 2009 | 11:16 PM

#587

Chris Moore

Evolving Member

Joined: Sep 2009

Posts: 123

Likes: 0

From: Creston, Iowa

Any idea of the culprit at all? Have any of you other 88590715 guys had this problem?

I can just edit the xml everytime I need to copy stuff from my old 5.10 map to make it work anyway.

Reply Like

Oct 20, 2009 | 11:18 PM

#588

tephra

Thread Starter

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 66

From: Melbourne, Australia

you can just change the names in V5.10 to something else..

Reply Like

Oct 20, 2009 | 11:25 PM

#589

R/TErnie

Evolved Member

iTrader: (32)

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 5,380

Likes: 6

From: WAR EAGLE!

Thanks Tephra,
I hope to get in on the testing tomorrow. I'll make an effort in the afternoon. Deposit coming soon!

N00bish question. Can I patch in Mr.Fred's PSI based boost control?

Last edited by R/TErnie; Oct 20, 2009 at 11:28 PM.

Reply Like

Oct 21, 2009 | 04:17 AM

#590

recompile

Evolved Member

iTrader: (38)

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 1,745

Likes: 8

From: New Hampshire, USA

Quote:

Originally Posted by nonschlont

I was using this for the thermo fan duty (88590015) and it worked fine using the test v.6 rom, but for some reason its not showing up for me w/ the new v.7... Am I missing somethin?

Probably forgot to add the scale

<scaling name="Percent (128)" units="%" toexpr="x/1.28" frexpr="x*1.28" format="%.0f" min="0" max="100" inc="1" storagetype="uint8" endian="big"/>

Reply Like

Oct 21, 2009 | 06:45 AM

#591

YaroRS

Evolving Member

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 226

Likes: 0

From: Moscow, Russia

is it possible to turn on MAT mod running Option 4 (v7 + Mods) ? Want to see efficiency of my intercooler (using GM MAT sensor connected to fuel temp input, running on evo 8 edm). When I open hex file in ecuflash all tables are screwed. Any sugestions how to fix it ?

Reply Like

Oct 21, 2009 | 07:07 AM

#592

ohhgyeahfasho

Evolving Member

iTrader: (14)

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 179

Likes: 0

From: Los Angeles, CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by R/TErnie

Thanks Tephra,
I hope to get in on the testing tomorrow. I'll make an effort in the afternoon. Deposit coming soon!

N00bish question. Can I patch in Mr.Fred's PSI based boost control?

Download recompile's version, it is already been pre-patched for Mr.Fred's PSI-based and JDM Map sensor and cleaned up xml.

Quote:

Originally Posted by recompile

Here's the 88590715 ROM with mods applied:

Download

INSTRUCTIONS: Copy all XML files to %Program Files%\OpenECU\EcuFlash\rommetadata\mitsubishi\evo . No editing needed.

IMPORTANT: If you do not have a JDM MAP, revert all tables in the "MAPSensor" category back to your old ROM's settings. Also, set FEA bit.14 (MAP vs. Baro) to 1.

These are all changes applied to this ROM:

Setup for JDM MAP and PSI based boost control (mrfred)
WGDC Correction Interval set to 1 (Stock = 10)
Max Total Upward WGDC Correction @ 100% TPS set to 0 (Stock = 10)
EGR System Disabled (mrfred)
Max Timing Retard set to -20 degrees (tephra)
FAA bit.10 disabled ("weird unknown" timing pull at cruise)
FAA bit.09 disabled (cat-warmup ignition retard)
FBA bit.00 disabled (lean spool)
FCA bit.09 disabled (EGR Test)
OBD Inspection set to Pass all tests (acamus)
Rear O2 Heater patch applied (mrfred)
Airflow Rate calculation patch applied (mrfred)
Fuel Cut Load Limit x2 and set to 300 (mrfred)

Here are all EvoScan data items that are added with this patch (the Lbs/min below is ACTUAL, not estimated, thanks to Airflow rate calc patch):

PHP Code:


			
        <DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Load1Byte" LogReference="Load1Byte" RequestID="41" Eval="1.2*x" Unit="load" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="270" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="270" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
        <DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Boost Error" LogReference="BoostError" RequestID="8A" Eval="0.0241*x-3.087" Unit="psi" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="-25" GaugeMax="25" ChartMin="-25" ChartMax="25" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
        <DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Lbs/min" LogReference="LbsMin" RequestID="46" RequestID2="47" Eval="0.00312*x" Unit="lbs/min" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="10000" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="10000" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
        <DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Gear" LogReference="Gear" RequestID="40" Eval="x" Unit="units" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="300" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="300" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="5" Visible="False" />

Last edited by ohhgyeahfasho; Oct 21, 2009 at 07:11 AM.

Reply Like

Oct 21, 2009 | 08:57 AM

#593

fostytou

EvoM Community Team

iTrader: (15)

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 3,143

Likes: 7

From: Aurora, IL

Quote:

Originally Posted by tephra

thats the include rear02 sim yes? not a patch applied after right?

No, it was the after patch, and it is definitely NOT working. It is hunting for the correct AFR, but the trims are WAY off....

Reply Like

Oct 21, 2009 | 09:10 AM

#594

Jack_of_Trades

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 3,523

Likes: 2

From: Opelika,AL

Quote:

Originally Posted by YaroRS

Once we launch the revised XML's, they will already hav the MAT tables pre-loaded as well as a ton of other patch tables that get commonly used

I may be splitting up the XML files a bit so we have a 9653x706_Base.XML which gets used in all 9653x706 versions. The base xml has all of the stock tables that work with any version of 96530006 since they control all of the factory tables and maps.

As we find more and more tables/maps in the stock ROM we'll only need to update one XML file wihout really interfering with anything else,but every v7 patched version will always stay 'current'

Reply Like

Oct 21, 2009 | 09:36 AM

#595

95630706

Evolving Member

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 274

Likes: 0

From: MA

More noob ?s

I apologize if I missed it, but if I wait patiently a 96530706 MAT patched version will be coming?

I couldn't find just the 96530006 patch to add to Phenom's ROM in the MAT thread, only a pre-patched, pre V7 ROM.

Thanks

Reply Like

Oct 21, 2009 | 10:15 AM

#596

Jim in Tucson

Evolved Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 1,480

Likes: 1

From: Tucson, Arizona, USA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evo_Kid

...scaling for AFR needs to have its "display min" and "display max" at 8 and 20, instead of 5 and 30.

Turns map into this

ARRRRG! What am I doing wrong? I changed as stated and my maps got even darker and uglier. Is there something else that needs to be changed?

Reply Like

Oct 21, 2009 | 10:25 AM

#597

Jim in Tucson

Evolved Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 1,480

Likes: 1

From: Tucson, Arizona, USA

I'm trying to move some of my E85 settings from 94170014 v5.1 to the new 96530706 v7.0. Old ROM is in Celsius and new ROM is in Fahrenheit.

I think I can manage the axis conversion.

I'm stumped by the data conversion when it is simply "steps". Maybe I'm overlooking the obvious? HELP! PLEASE!

Thanks,
Jim

Reply Like

Oct 21, 2009 | 10:43 AM

#598

churchja

Evolving Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 302

Likes: 0

From: Redondo Beach, CA

What is the recommend version of EcuFlash should I be using with V7?

Reply Like

Oct 21, 2009 | 10:48 AM

#599

Jim in Tucson

Evolved Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Oct 2006

Posts: 1,480

Likes: 1

From: Tucson, Arizona, USA

Quote:

Originally Posted by churchja

What is the recommend version of EcuFlash should I be using with V7?

1.41 or above. See post #2.

Reply Like

Oct 21, 2009 | 11:14 AM

#600

nano

Newbie

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 80

Likes: 0

From: OC

Make sure its set to Rainbow color map. I did that and it was still on Coldfire and looked like crap!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim in Tucson

ARRRRG! What am I doing wrong? I changed as stated and my maps got even darker and uglier. Is there something else that needs to be changed?

Reply Like