TephraMod V7

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 11, 2009 | 01:01 PM

#121

phenem

Evolved Member

iTrader: (39)

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 811

Likes: 4

From: Central PA

Quote:

Originally Posted by mt057

I know we need to copy over the immob. code but do we alter the int. code as well or leave as is? Sorry for the noob question. Also I do not see maf scaling am I using the wrong one? Is the maf comp. table it?

Sorry I mis-read your questions.

Copy over YOUR immob. code into the downloaded ROM don't touch the int. code at all.

Copy the rest of your fuel/timing/any other specific tune maps over too.

Flash to ECU and log/test!

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 01:33 PM

#122

fostytou

EvoM Community Team

iTrader: (15)

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 3,143

Likes: 7

From: Aurora, IL

Dang, this thread blew up!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monochrome

Might I suggest adding the rear O2 sensor heater disable to this patch as well?

Code:

<table name="Rear O2 Heater Patch" category="Mods" address="2c62a" type="1D" scaling="Hex16"/>

Open up the ROM, navigate to the "Mods" section, change "Rear O2 Heater Patch" from "4A0B" to "0009"

My rear O2 has been replaced with the wideband.

This might also work but I need to confirm the address!

Code:

	<table name="Heater CEL" category="Rear O2" address="2c61e" type="2D" level="2" scaling="blobbits">
		<table name="Bit values" type="Static Y Axis" flipy="true" elements="8">
			<data>N/A</data>
			<data>N/A</data>
			<data>N/A</data>
			<data>N/A</data>
			<data>Rear O2 Heater CEL Enable</data>
			<data>N/A</data>
			<data>N/A</data>
			<data>N/A</data>
		</table>
	</table>

I think its a bad idea to do this all together. I believe doing this does not only disable the check, but disables the heater also. Someone else confirm if I am wrong... but if it does disable the heater it will destroy the rearO2 pretty quickly for those of us that still have it.

If you didn't know any better (and haven't set the emissions output correctly), it might also show a not-ready for that during an emissions test. It might be best to just leave this one alone, or include the definition but leave it stock.

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 01:40 PM

#123

phenem

Evolved Member

iTrader: (39)

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 811

Likes: 4

From: Central PA

Quote:

Originally Posted by fostytou

Dang, this thread blew up!

I think its a bad idea to do this all together. I believe doing this does not only disable the check, but disables the heater also. Someone else confirm if I am wrong... but if it does disable the heater it will destroy the rearO2 pretty quickly for those of us that still have it.

If you didn't know any better (and haven't set the emissions output correctly), it might also show a not-ready for that during an emissions test. It might be best to just leave this one alone, or include the definition but leave it stock.

Agreed. I was not going to add it to the patch I was just going to add the XML.

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 01:42 PM

#124

Chris Moore

Evolving Member

Joined: Sep 2009

Posts: 123

Likes: 0

From: Creston, Iowa

Quote:

Originally Posted by recompile

What I think Chris meant is, from the factory, the boost control is load based. However, the load value the boost control system uses is SLIGHTLY different from the load value the timing/fuel maps use. This is what he is referring to as the "stock" boost control system.

This was later patched to reference the same load value that the timing/fuel maps use. This is what he is referring to as the "2 byte" boost control system. Although that's a bit misleading/incorrect. What he should have said is the "common load"or "standard load" boost control system. But yes, the values of this "common load" does match up with what we all came to know as "2 byte load" and that's the point.

As far as 2 byte vs. 1 byte... the difference is only for logging. They both reference the same value, as far as the ECU is concerned for the various maps and for the actual tune. 1 byte exists as a logging improvement only.

Tephra, can you answer this question? Can we just add mrfreds patch like normal? So load based boost will follow a more consistent load.
Thanks

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 02:32 PM

#125

R/TErnie

Evolved Member

iTrader: (32)

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 5,380

Likes: 6

From: WAR EAGLE!

Ok I read the whole thread. Excited for 88950715

I could've used the boost by gear at the track... I kept spinning 1st gear :/

Thanks Tephra, JoT, and Phenem for all of your work. Donation waiting when the 9's ROM is released!

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 02:59 PM

#126

evodood

Evolving Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jan 2007

Posts: 247

Likes: 0

From: cali

subscribed

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 03:13 PM

#127

tephra

Thread Starter

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 66

From: Melbourne, Australia

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Moore

Tephra, can you answer this question? Can we just add mrfreds patch like normal? So load based boost will follow a more consistent load.
Thanks

Yes!

MrFreds patch changes the TBEC routine - which I don't touch.

Any scaling changes will obviously need to be applied to the new 3d BDEL maps instead

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 03:29 PM

#128

Chris Moore

Evolving Member

Joined: Sep 2009

Posts: 123

Likes: 0

From: Creston, Iowa

Quote:

Originally Posted by tephra

Yes!

MrFreds patch changes the TBEC routine - which I don't touch.

Any scaling changes will obviously need to be applied to the new 3d BDEL maps instead

Thank you sir

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 03:31 PM

#129

drinky84

Newbie

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Apr 2009

Posts: 73

Likes: 2

From: SoCal

Can some please explain the "Launch" fuel and ignition capability, would this be like a standalone ignition retard?

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 06:19 PM

#130

03whitegsr

Evolved Member

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 4,001

Likes: 15

From: Utah

Somebody care to comment on what Boost control maps are still relevant and which are not?

I want to eliminate any unneeded/replaced tables where every possible.

Attached Thumbnails

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 06:24 PM

#131

tephra

Thread Starter

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 9,486

Likes: 66

From: Melbourne, Australia

BDEL High Gear Range
BDEL Low Gear Range
BWGDC High Gear Range
BWGDC Low Gear Range

Are no longer in use. The rest are.

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 06:27 PM

#132

03whitegsr

Evolved Member

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 4,001

Likes: 15

From: Utah

Excellent, thank you.

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 06:38 PM

#133

Vigman

Evolving Member

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 434

Likes: 1

From: Mexico

Will it be possible to include Mr Fred' temperature logging on version 7.1?
Having the V.7 + EGT logs will be the best rom ever for me!!!
Thanx Tephra for your great work! Will donate with 88590015' release ;-)
Cheers
C>

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 06:52 PM

#134

Slo_crx1

Evolved Member

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 821

Likes: 1

From: Simpson, PA

Just a thought for an add-in, might want to include the MAP sensor tables that can be adjusted for different map sensor types for logging in Evoscan. With the Omni 4 bar being a very viable option I'm sure you'll see quite a few more people using them compared to a stock Evo X type.

Reply Like

Oct 11, 2009 | 08:25 PM

#135

GST Motorsports

Account Disabled

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 3,366

Likes: 0

From: Hayward

Tephra you rock!

You have paypal.

Does boost drop on knock go to 0% WGDC without BDEL correction applied? Is "High Knock Boost Drop and Knock CEL Flash time" the time that 0% WGDC is applied, then after that has elapsed it references WGDC map again?

- Bryan

Last edited by GST Motorsports; Oct 11, 2009 at 08:28 PM.

Reply Like