Notices
ECU Flash

Turbo Effeciency Tables

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2010, 09:43 AM
  #46  
wip
Evolving Member
 
wip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Appauldd
Amazing work as always.

It appears the Green is a lot more efficient down low than I had though.

My goal was to tune for 27psi. It appears that I can get 27psi as early as 2600 rpm assuming a 90 VE ratio this low. Then I can easily hold 27psi until 6000 rpm (100 VE). There after the turbo rapidly runs out of breath. By 7400 (95 VE) I should be no higher than 21psi.

Now the goal is to find this boost down low.

I started another thread about tuning for faster spool....
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...ter-spool.html

There is some wonderful suggestions so far. The goal, in my case, is to have to longest torque curve as possible for AutoX, and the occasional Track day.

I am not sure if I am estimating my VE correctly though. Can someone chime in on the exact method to calculate accurate VE ? ? ?
Something like this?

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/6674697-post167.html
Old Jan 12, 2010, 09:48 AM
  #47  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Good call. I knew there was a better way that would be more accurate than my calculations.
Old Jan 12, 2010, 10:24 AM
  #48  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Danieln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: EUROPE
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is a good link

http://www.stealth316.com/2-3s-compflowmaps.htm#fm

Last edited by Danieln; Jan 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM. Reason: Off Topic
Old Jan 12, 2010, 10:37 AM
  #49  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Danieln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: EUROPE
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry OFF TOPIC
Old Jan 12, 2010, 10:40 AM
  #50  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (22)
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
No you are fine....don't worry about it.

For spool though...try this thread...
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...ter-spool.html
Old Jan 12, 2010, 10:57 AM
  #51  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Danieln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: EUROPE
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks mate,

I just move the add into the correct tread...
Old Jan 12, 2010, 11:35 AM
  #52  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Danieln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: EUROPE
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how much airflow an engine consumes at a certain pressure ratio....
Attached Thumbnails Turbo Effeciency Tables-air-flow-maps.jpg  
Old Jan 12, 2010, 11:22 PM
  #53  
Evolved Member
 
acamus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lattitude 48.38°, Longitude 17.58°, Altitude 146m = Slovakia, for common dude
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Here are "my" 0.02
Old Jan 13, 2010, 01:25 AM
  #54  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
EvoIan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pa
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by acamus
Here are "my" 0.02
Pretty good information there...

If anyone wants more, I suggest this one... Has some pretty good info including a method for selecting a 400 hp turbo for a 2.0L, that is if you can stand the authors obvious obsession for an Ecotech...

Turbocharging Performance Handbook

Last edited by EvoIan; Jan 13, 2010 at 01:29 AM.
Old Jan 13, 2010, 05:13 AM
  #55  
Evolved Member
 
crcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
The stock turbo tapers boost because it is basically riding the choke flow down the compressor map. Nothing you do (even welding the wastegate shut) will be able to hold more than a certain amount of boost to redline. It's just the limitation of the compressor wheel.
I thought it was because exhaust back pressure was overwhelming the gate. Do you have any evidence to prove what you are saying?
Old Jan 13, 2010, 05:37 AM
  #56  
Evolved Member
 
acamus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lattitude 48.38°, Longitude 17.58°, Altitude 146m = Slovakia, for common dude
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by crcain
I thought it was because exhaust back pressure was overwhelming the gate. Do you have any evidence to prove what you are saying?
It is also called aerodynamic blocking, once the velocity of air passing thru flow intersection area overcomes local speed of sound the aerodynamic block happens (chocking). It simply nature of a compressor.
Old Jan 13, 2010, 06:33 AM
  #57  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by crcain
I thought it was because exhaust back pressure was overwhelming the gate. Do you have any evidence to prove what you are saying?
I can't link you to anything, but I know people who have welded their gates closed. That doesn't matter. The compressors have a flow limit. There is nothing that you can do to surpass that. You aren't going to flow 100lb/min out of our compressor wheel no matter what you do. That is what compressor maps are for...to find the operator range of that compressor wheel and match an engine to it.
Old Jan 13, 2010, 06:46 AM
  #58  
Evolved Member
 
crcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
I can't link you to anything, but I know people who have welded their gates closed. That doesn't matter. The compressors have a flow limit. There is nothing that you can do to surpass that. You aren't going to flow 100lb/min out of our compressor wheel no matter what you do. That is what compressor maps are for...to find the operator range of that compressor wheel and match an engine to it.
That makes sense... you're definitely convincing me.

But how do you explain an almost entirely stock Evo bleeding boost similarly to a highly modded Evo... when the modded Evo has way, way more airflow for the same amount of boost.
Old Jan 13, 2010, 03:44 PM
  #59  
Evolved Member
 
crcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by crcain
But how do you explain an almost entirely stock Evo bleeding boost similarly to a highly modded Evo... when the modded Evo has way, way more airflow for the same amount of boost.
Any response? I'm dying to hear the answer. I'm perplexed
Old Jan 13, 2010, 05:59 PM
  #60  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by crcain
But how do you explain an almost entirely stock Evo bleeding boost similarly to a highly modded Evo... when the modded Evo has way, way more airflow for the same amount of boost.
Your question is a bit vague. Are you talking about a stock Evo that tapers to 15psi or a stock Evo that tapers to 23ish psi like a modded Evo.

If the former, it's set like that in the ECU...one of the reasons why we get boost controllers or tune the ECU boost control. If the latter, it doesn't matter how many mods a car has. The compressor's max flow doesn't change. The mods help with airflow at the same psi, as long as you aren't at the compressor's limit. Also, mods will help with VE and/or timing advance which can give more power.

But, the max airflow of the compressor isn't going to change.


Quick Reply: Turbo Effeciency Tables



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:33 AM.