Did my tuner do a good job?
Sep 10, 2011, 11:45 AM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did my tuner do a good job?
My buddy, tuned my car and he said it was okay to post.
Hey guys, I'm new to this tuning thing and as I made a few datalogs and read my map's I'm just wondering if they are: okay, safe, bad, etc... I'm still in the learning proses so I want other peoples word on it.
Car: 2004 AS EvoVIII SSL
Fuel: 93 Octane
My mods are: evo9 turbo, 255 pump, cranky pully, 3.5 fmic, licp, evo9 diverter valve, cone filter, tbe, shep stage 3 transfer case.
Attached are: High oct. timing map, High oct. fuel map, 2 data logs
Thanks in advance!
Ben
Hey guys, I'm new to this tuning thing and as I made a few datalogs and read my map's I'm just wondering if they are: okay, safe, bad, etc... I'm still in the learning proses so I want other peoples word on it.
Car: 2004 AS EvoVIII SSL
Fuel: 93 Octane
My mods are: evo9 turbo, 255 pump, cranky pully, 3.5 fmic, licp, evo9 diverter valve, cone filter, tbe, shep stage 3 transfer case.
Attached are: High oct. timing map, High oct. fuel map, 2 data logs
Thanks in advance!
Ben
Last edited by benselements41; Sep 10, 2011 at 12:06 PM. Reason: Grammar
Sep 10, 2011, 12:06 PM
#5
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Charles, IL
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks okay, I guess. You have provided limited information. Can't tell anything about the fuel.
Timing map is blocked and has some sloppy values put in. Take the 220 load column. At any given load as you pass peak torque you will in most every case want to increase timing as you increase RPM. Your map goes 8-10-9-13. Given the computer interpolates from these values, it is not ideal. Your the logs show a non progressive timing curve (12-8-8-8-10-9-8-7-9-8-9-10-12). With all that being said, I wouldn't tune a car like that for multiple reasons BUT that doesn't mean the car won't run great with those specific mods in the specific environment it was tuned.
Why are you asking? Do you not trust the tuner or is the car not up to your satisfaction?
Timing map is blocked and has some sloppy values put in. Take the 220 load column. At any given load as you pass peak torque you will in most every case want to increase timing as you increase RPM. Your map goes 8-10-9-13. Given the computer interpolates from these values, it is not ideal. Your the logs show a non progressive timing curve (12-8-8-8-10-9-8-7-9-8-9-10-12). With all that being said, I wouldn't tune a car like that for multiple reasons BUT that doesn't mean the car won't run great with those specific mods in the specific environment it was tuned.
Why are you asking? Do you not trust the tuner or is the car not up to your satisfaction?
Sep 10, 2011, 12:33 PM
#7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Get your TPS checked out. Unless you didnt floor it until 6k? Also, why are you datalogging so many things? It slows your logging down logging all that unneeded stuff.
As for the tune, I think your timing still needs some work. Did you even log your AFR's?
As for the tune, I think your timing still needs some work. Did you even log your AFR's?
Last edited by b16a95eg; Sep 10, 2011 at 12:46 PM.
Trending Topics
Sep 10, 2011, 12:35 PM
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks okay, I guess. You have provided limited information. Can't tell anything about the fuel.
Timing map is blocked and has some sloppy values put in. Take the 220 load column. At any given load as you pass peak torque you will in most every case want to increase timing as you increase RPM. Your map goes 8-10-9-13. Given the computer interpolates from these values, it is not ideal. Your the logs show a non progressive timing curve (12-8-8-8-10-9-8-7-9-8-9-10-12). With all that being said, I wouldn't tune a car like that for multiple reasons BUT that doesn't mean the car won't run great with those specific mods in the specific environment it was tuned.
Why are you asking? Do you not trust the tuner or is the car not up to your satisfaction?
Timing map is blocked and has some sloppy values put in. Take the 220 load column. At any given load as you pass peak torque you will in most every case want to increase timing as you increase RPM. Your map goes 8-10-9-13. Given the computer interpolates from these values, it is not ideal. Your the logs show a non progressive timing curve (12-8-8-8-10-9-8-7-9-8-9-10-12). With all that being said, I wouldn't tune a car like that for multiple reasons BUT that doesn't mean the car won't run great with those specific mods in the specific environment it was tuned.
Why are you asking? Do you not trust the tuner or is the car not up to your satisfaction?
Sep 10, 2011, 12:43 PM
#9
I'm gonna have to agree with razorlab, I wouldn't call that a finished tune.
First, like Boltz said, timing map is sloppy. Fuel map is kinda sloppy too, IMO.
And on your logs, your not even going WOT (100% throttle) till 6K RPM. To do a proper pull, you need to go WOT around 2500-3K RPM to redline.
And those logs dont have any wideband AFR data. Hope you guys are using a WB during tuning.......
First, like Boltz said, timing map is sloppy. Fuel map is kinda sloppy too, IMO.
And on your logs, your not even going WOT (100% throttle) till 6K RPM. To do a proper pull, you need to go WOT around 2500-3K RPM to redline.
And those logs dont have any wideband AFR data. Hope you guys are using a WB during tuning.......
Last edited by Boosted Tuning; Sep 10, 2011 at 12:45 PM.
