Notices
ECU Flash

Final consensus on SD for a daily driver?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 25, 2011 | 10:49 PM
  #61  
Levar's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 6
From: Central Texas
From reading through everthing here, I can see the benefits of the speed density route. I have also noticed that nearly every guy that has posted in this thread either tunes or lives in close proximity to someone that tunes. For the average guy that is not a tuner and does not live in close proximity to a tuner to have those "tweaks" and adjustments made, the concensus is to remain with the stock MAF sensor, right?
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 03:42 AM
  #62  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by pure_evo
From reading through everthing here, I can see the benefits of the speed density route. I have also noticed that nearly every guy that has posted in this thread either tunes or lives in close proximity to someone that tunes. For the average guy that is not a tuner and does not live in close proximity to a tuner to have those "tweaks" and adjustments made, the concensus is to remain with the stock MAF sensor, right?
completely up to you. you don't need a local tuner to be tuned on sd.. sd is actually really easy to tune remote.

now if you want to vent a tial bov or something of that nature, then id say you have no choice.. you would want to be on sd for that.

my personal cars still on a maf (lol), i just removed the screen, did proper ecu mods to remove load/fuel cap limits and scaled map accordingly to the loads i hit.. does just fine. makes very good power for its mods.

im sure id gain some hp switching to sd once changing the intake pipe, bov, etc, but i have a personal goal to reach on maf first.

so its completely up to you. eventually my car will be on sd though.

hope that helps.
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 04:52 AM
  #63  
Levar's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 6
From: Central Texas
Originally Posted by tscompusa
completely up to you. you don't need a local tuner to be tuned on sd.. sd is actually really easy to tune remote.

now if you want to vent a tial bov or something of that nature, then id say you have no choice.. you would want to be on sd for that.

my personal cars still on a maf (lol), i just removed the screen, did proper ecu mods to remove load/fuel cap limits and scaled map accordingly to the loads i hit.. does just fine. makes very good power for its mods.

im sure id gain some hp switching to sd once changing the intake pipe, bov, etc, but i have a personal goal to reach on maf first.

so its completely up to you. eventually my car will be on sd though.

hope that helps.
I am trying to honor my banner to "do things right the first time" without having parts all over my garage. Since I have already bought a custom speed density intake from Magnus, I suppose I will remain on the path. I already have the BR UICP flanged for the Tial BOV not to mention that I bought the speed density bundle from MAP last week. I did not know that remote speed density tuning was an option.
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 05:29 AM
  #64  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
for sure go that route then.. the last 3 cars i did remote were all sd. black, ef4, 30r.. (30r posted his results in the dyno section). if you have the hardware, there's absolutely no reason not to utilize it!

the only reason i don't run it on my car yet is because i want to hit a specific mph at the track on maf.. just a personal goal of mine.
Old Dec 26, 2011 | 05:36 AM
  #65  
Levar's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 6
From: Central Texas
Originally Posted by tscompusa
for sure go that route then. the last 3 cars i did remote were all sd. black, ef4, 30r (30r posted his results in the dyno section). if you have the hardware, there's absolutely no reason not to utilize it!
Personally, I have the EF3 at the moment with all of the bells and whistles.
Old Jan 13, 2012 | 06:10 AM
  #66  
Lukelis's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 293
Likes: 10
From: Lithuania-USA
Im thinking about SD on my evo 9 for DD too and have AEM 5 bar map, do I need to buy Omni 4 bar?
Old Jan 13, 2012 | 09:40 AM
  #67  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,400
Likes: 75
From: Northwest
It makes it easier but its not 100% necessary. The 4 bar gives better resolution and works out to 44psi.

Aaron
Old Jan 13, 2012 | 12:07 PM
  #68  
Lukelis's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 293
Likes: 10
From: Lithuania-USA
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
It makes it easier but its not 100% necessary. The 4 bar gives better resolution and works out to 44psi.

Aaron

thanks
Old Jan 13, 2012 | 05:48 PM
  #69  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,280
Likes: 41
From: Watertown, NY
Originally Posted by pure_evo
From reading through everthing here, I can see the benefits of the speed density route. I have also noticed that nearly every guy that has posted in this thread either tunes or lives in close proximity to someone that tunes. For the average guy that is not a tuner and does not live in close proximity to a tuner to have those "tweaks" and adjustments made, the concensus is to remain with the stock MAF sensor, right?
Ive been tuning less than a year. Within hrs of tuning sd the first time i was able to drive decently without going back and forth to maf sd for safety. If you can maf tune. You can def sd tune.. easier imho
Old Jan 13, 2012 | 10:35 PM
  #70  
Levar's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 6
From: Central Texas
Originally Posted by 211ratsbud
Ive been tuning less than a year. Within hrs of tuning sd the first time i was able to drive decently without going back and forth to maf sd for safety. If you can maf tune. You can def sd tune. easier imho
I am pretty set that this will be the route I take until I start to see any adverse effects, if any. I have a nice custom Magnus speed density intake and I am excited to see how it looks once everything is installed.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bananayellowevo
Evo General
1
Nov 30, 2016 08:07 AM
Evo_Goodness
ECU Flash
7
Sep 29, 2016 11:31 PM
EvilDSM97
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
3
Jun 25, 2016 07:55 AM
jake33
AEM EMS
9
Oct 7, 2015 06:42 PM



Quick Reply: Final consensus on SD for a daily driver?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:55 PM.