Actual AFR's to match AFR on fuel map?
#1
Actual AFR's to match AFR on fuel map?
What is all needed to be done in ecuflash so that my car will read the same AFR value i input in my fuel maps? it seems to be a little off,idk if thats normal or if i have something wrong like injector scaling or MAF scaling. thanks.
#4
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
MAF makes AFR numbers matching fuel mapping a lot trickier than SD. Infact even on SD if you match your numbers at 11.5 theres no guarantee that it will be accurate to make your fuel map 10.5 and recieve a 10.5. This serves no functional purpose in MAF, and the only thing it does in SD is makes it a little more visual to work with, but then your VE table is!!!! lol.. dont get preoccupied with making them match in MAF is what Im getting at. If you want to switch to SD and tune VE accordingly that makes sense however.
#5
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
Dont worry about having the number in the fuel map, match your actual AFR. Just use the numbers as arbitrary numbers, higher means leaner and lower mean richer.
You can try to use MAF comp to make them match, but its time consuming and not worth it and sometimes you cant get it to match everywhere.
You can try to use MAF comp to make them match, but its time consuming and not worth it and sometimes you cant get it to match everywhere.
#6
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Dont worry about having the number in the fuel map, match your actual AFR. Just use the numbers as arbitrary numbers, higher means leaner and lower mean richer.
You can try to use MAF comp to make them match, but its time consuming and not worth it and sometimes you cant get it to match everywhere.
You can try to use MAF comp to make them match, but its time consuming and not worth it and sometimes you cant get it to match everywhere.
Trending Topics
#8
Evolving Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: L.I. New York
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes, 2d.
My lean area is 2500k - 4500k, After 4500k the numbers are a bit closer
Seems like I will need to add quite a bit to bring it down.
Not sure how smooth the transition will be from <2500k.
My lean area is 2500k - 4500k, After 4500k the numbers are a bit closer
Seems like I will need to add quite a bit to bring it down.
Not sure how smooth the transition will be from <2500k.
#13
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: L.I. New York
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did not do the initial SD tune so I did not touch MAP VE
Here's what I have seems close to 1:1
13.4376 12
25.6536 24
37.8696 35
50.0856 47
74.5176 73
116.052 114
145.370 144
415.344 413
Current RPM VE
500 78
1000 79
1250 85
1500 90
2000 98
2500 104
3000 107
3500 107
4000 107
4500 106
5000 105
5500 105
.
.
.
My concern was having too much of an increase, say bumping up
3k-4.5k to 109
Not sure if surrounding areas need to be "smoothed"
BTW
thanks for your help, appreciate it
Here's what I have seems close to 1:1
13.4376 12
25.6536 24
37.8696 35
50.0856 47
74.5176 73
116.052 114
145.370 144
415.344 413
Current RPM VE
500 78
1000 79
1250 85
1500 90
2000 98
2500 104
3000 107
3500 107
4000 107
4500 106
5000 105
5500 105
.
.
.
My concern was having too much of an increase, say bumping up
3k-4.5k to 109
Not sure if surrounding areas need to be "smoothed"
BTW
thanks for your help, appreciate it
#14
Evolving Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I start tuning SD from MAP VE always... There are no radical changes from base setup, it might be slightly different than 1:1.
RPM VE map is very individual, but in my own car there is 120+ VE at higher RPM range (3500-8000rpm).
RPM VE map is very individual, but in my own car there is 120+ VE at higher RPM range (3500-8000rpm).