Notices
ECU Flash

closed loop target afr

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2012, 12:35 PM
  #16  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
SnailSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 355
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
not bad, I can't get any better than 22mpg on my wrx no matter how I drive so if I can get the same with an evo ill be happy
Old Oct 21, 2012, 12:40 PM
  #17  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
SnailSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 355
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptord
DD'ing around town, with not much highway, expect 17's or so unless you get into boost often. Highway, should be around 24-25.

I usually average 19 or so in the city and 26-27 highway.
You are not running stock injectors right?
Old Oct 21, 2012, 01:47 PM
  #18  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
evo8426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 4,248
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by SnailSpeed
You are not running stock injectors right?
Injector size has nothing to do with gas mileage

I average around 23 highway and 20 city. I'm on stock turbo so if you go to a larger turbo you should expect to get better than this.
Old Oct 21, 2012, 01:53 PM
  #19  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
SnailSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 355
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by evo8426
Injector size has nothing to do with gas mileage

I average around 23 highway and 20 city. I'm on stock turbo so if you go to a larger turbo you should expect to get better than this.
Actually it can, if you have injectors that don't atomize fuel really well gas mileage can be a little worse. In the subaru world some people decap their stockers to flow 850ish cc and they flow but the spray pattern sucks.
Old Oct 21, 2012, 05:57 PM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
evo8426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 4,248
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Well it doesn't apply here in the Evo world. I get better gas mileage with 1200cc than the stock 560cc.
Old Oct 21, 2012, 06:13 PM
  #21  
Evolving Member
 
masafina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
subd, good info here
Old Oct 21, 2012, 08:14 PM
  #22  
Evolved Member
 
foxbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UAE
Posts: 926
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by SnailSpeed
Are these the actual names of the tables in ecuflash? i'm looking at an evo8 map. The reason I asked this is because on my wrx i changed the cl target afr to 15:1 and along with running more advance timing at low load/rpm it improves gas mileage by a decent amount without sacrificing driveability. I'm thinking of selling my wrx and getting an evo and just wanna know what can be done tuning wise. These cars aren't made to get good gas mileage but if you can improve it why not?
Sorry to be off topic, besides this one value under 'cl target afr' do I need to adjust all the 14.7s in the fuel map (STi/WRX rom)?
Old Oct 21, 2012, 09:31 PM
  #23  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
SnailSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 355
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by evo8426
Well it doesn't apply here in the Evo world. I get better gas mileage with 1200cc than the stock 560cc.
i'm sure they are brand name good quality injectors, thats probably why I guess what I mean to say is that injector size won't affect gas mileage that much as long as your still able to achieve 14.7 or leaner in cl or under normal driving conditions and as long as the injectors have a decent spray pattern.
Old Oct 21, 2012, 09:36 PM
  #24  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
SnailSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 355
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by foxbat
Sorry to be off topic, besides this one value under 'cl target afr' do I need to adjust all the 14.7s in the fuel map (STi/WRX rom)?
unless you plan on running ol all the time you don't, besides if you wanna run leaner afr the primary open loop table in a wrx rom maxes out at 14.7 anyway. So you have to keep cl for cruising conditions and either raise the "closed loop base fueling target" or raise the "cl fueling target compensation (load)", I do both for best results.
Old Oct 22, 2012, 02:03 AM
  #25  
Evolved Member
 
foxbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UAE
Posts: 926
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by SnailSpeed
unless you plan on running ol all the time you don't, besides if you wanna run leaner afr the primary open loop table in a wrx rom maxes out at 14.7 anyway. So you have to keep cl for cruising conditions and either raise the "closed loop base fueling target" or raise the "cl fueling target compensation (load)", I do both for best results.
My goal is to run leaner under CL for a better fuel economy, something like 15.1. What % should I raise the values under 'cl fuel compensation (load)' to achieve 15.1 AFR?
What about the 'cl fueling target limits' (rich & lean limits)?
Old Oct 22, 2012, 10:00 AM
  #26  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
SnailSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 355
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by foxbat
My goal is to run leaner under CL for a better fuel economy, something like 15.1. What % should I raise the values under 'cl fuel compensation (load)' to achieve 15.1 AFR?
What about the 'cl fueling target limits' (rich & lean limits)?
I pmd you.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dr. Jekyll
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
3
Apr 1, 2016 08:42 AM
dr_latino999
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
10
Jan 22, 2016 05:37 PM
tsitalon1
ECU Flash
37
Jun 29, 2014 03:16 AM
07EvoIX
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
11
Jun 6, 2012 03:29 PM



Quick Reply: closed loop target afr



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:29 AM.