Ralliart EvoScan Log - Question on TPS and LTFT
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: florida
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ralliart EvoScan Log - Question on TPS and LTFT
Trying to learn about ECUFlash and EvoScan
I just ran a few EvoScan 2.9 logs of my Ralliart running the GST Base Tune 93 oct Boost Pill v30,07
I have a few questions about the log
My TPS maxes out at 96.11% . I have found articles saying max TPS on a Ralliart is 87%
Do I possibly have a problem ?
Also I have questions about my LTFT values
LTFT_Idle 5.078
LTFT_Cruise -20.11
LTFT_High - 23.43
Are these normal ? Is there anything that I can glean from these values ?
I also have questions about the Manifold Air Temp MAT and Intake Air Temp IAT
IAT 240
MAT 50
Should there be such a difference between the two ?
Where are these readings being taken from ?
I have attached the log file.
Is there anything else that I should pay attention to from this log ?
I just ran a few EvoScan 2.9 logs of my Ralliart running the GST Base Tune 93 oct Boost Pill v30,07
I have a few questions about the log
My TPS maxes out at 96.11% . I have found articles saying max TPS on a Ralliart is 87%
Do I possibly have a problem ?
Also I have questions about my LTFT values
LTFT_Idle 5.078
LTFT_Cruise -20.11
LTFT_High - 23.43
Are these normal ? Is there anything that I can glean from these values ?
I also have questions about the Manifold Air Temp MAT and Intake Air Temp IAT
IAT 240
MAT 50
Should there be such a difference between the two ?
Where are these readings being taken from ?
I have attached the log file.
Is there anything else that I should pay attention to from this log ?
Last edited by ivan308; Feb 4, 2013 at 08:25 AM. Reason: added
#2
Evolved Member
I fear some of your logging addresses are wrong. Not all, but some.
APP, InVVT, MAF Volts, Octane look incorrect.
TPS not an issue - probably just "percent" instead of "degree angle". That 87 value is DEGREES, not percent.
Your logging speed is really slow. You can make it faster by logging less stuff. Or... add the "RAX Fast Logging" patch. EvoScan 2.9.0023 supports this new logging style. You'll get 34-odd items, probably at 20 lines a second.
Note that GST Base Map v31 has RAX Fast Logging built in.
Rich
APP, InVVT, MAF Volts, Octane look incorrect.
TPS not an issue - probably just "percent" instead of "degree angle". That 87 value is DEGREES, not percent.
Your logging speed is really slow. You can make it faster by logging less stuff. Or... add the "RAX Fast Logging" patch. EvoScan 2.9.0023 supports this new logging style. You'll get 34-odd items, probably at 20 lines a second.
Note that GST Base Map v31 has RAX Fast Logging built in.
Rich
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: florida
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rich
To log I am using the built in Evoscan Mod23 USA RA EVOX definitions
The other option that I have seen is the Golden 2008 v2 EVOX however most of the Request ID's are the same.
I am also concerned that some of these may be incorrect as I was seeing IAT of 240 F when ambient was 60F
I found the following post by Bryan that has different Request ID's
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/9983232-post73.html
Is there a guide that you can point me to for Evoscan logging for the 2009 Ralliart
The slow logging speed may be due to the fact that I am running Evoscan as a Parallels Virtual Machine on my Mac.
To log I am using the built in Evoscan Mod23 USA RA EVOX definitions
The other option that I have seen is the Golden 2008 v2 EVOX however most of the Request ID's are the same.
I am also concerned that some of these may be incorrect as I was seeing IAT of 240 F when ambient was 60F
I found the following post by Bryan that has different Request ID's
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/9983232-post73.html
Is there a guide that you can point me to for Evoscan logging for the 2009 Ralliart
The slow logging speed may be due to the fact that I am running Evoscan as a Parallels Virtual Machine on my Mac.
Last edited by ivan308; Feb 4, 2013 at 07:26 PM.
#4
Evolved Member
Golden's site points the way for "53600009" addresses...
http://goldenevo.com/logx_view.php?ecu=13
Compare what you're logging with those.
lol, this raw address-based stuff must die. RAX Fast Logging must rule the world.... one day.... soon...
Rich
http://goldenevo.com/logx_view.php?ecu=13
Compare what you're logging with those.
lol, this raw address-based stuff must die. RAX Fast Logging must rule the world.... one day.... soon...
Rich
#5
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: florida
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks
Thanks Rich those match up with what Bryan posted.
I will give them a try as soon as I get my car back from the body shop. (Lady in bug used her front bumper to rearrange my rear number.)
I will give them a try as soon as I get my car back from the body shop. (Lady in bug used her front bumper to rearrange my rear number.)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
evo4mad
ECU Flash
1880
May 5, 2015 06:22 PM
hkumar
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
11
Sep 9, 2013 07:55 PM