Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Dyno numbers for gsc s1`s AMS tune (post your gsc s1 dyno # here

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2008, 02:04 PM
  #16  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Akisan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: P-town
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I made 340/340 on Dyno dynamics on my 9 se
I got 350/340 on dynojet before, got retuned
So that's about 355~360 on dynojet.
Tune is really important...Jb rocks
Old Jul 7, 2008, 04:33 PM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (82)
 
MasterNater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 865
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts
Well, it would appear I have one of those weaker cars

If I had a scanner, I'd post up my dyno graph. I was recently tuned @ AMS about a month or so ago and with the mods in my signature, I was only able to put down 325hp and 311tq. I was really hoping to hit in the 340's or 350's. No boost leaks and a solid 11.5 a/f ratio on BP 93 octane fuel. The boost spikes to 23psi and then falls off all the way to 17psi at redline. I was thinking about looking into an upgraded wastegate actuator or maybe going fp green this winter while the cars in storage.

Overall I'm very satisfied with the tune though. I picked up 35hp from the tuning alone. Even though I didn't hit the numbers I wanted, the car is a joy to drive.

You've got some impressive numbers though! Enjoy it and drive safe.
Old Feb 10, 2009, 12:07 AM
  #18  
Newbie
 
hennessey01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Las Cruces, New Mexico
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a question through....Does it really matter what type of tuning computer you use? I was going to go with GSC stage 1, along with a tbe, perrin intake, hallman boost controller, and the accessport from cobb.
Old Feb 12, 2009, 10:09 AM
  #19  
Newbie
 
evogsrviii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ocean City, New Jers
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evo 8 TBE, Intake, fuel pump, MBC, S1's...tuned at 24psi.

Old Feb 12, 2009, 03:45 PM
  #20  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
cinek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: palm harbor florida
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
evo9 here!I retuned my car lately at TTP with a new intake and made 370/383 on Mustang dyno
Old Feb 13, 2009, 07:47 PM
  #21  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
evo_gerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Trinidad & Tobago
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well my numbers aren't that great but i made 306whp/270wtq on a dynojet @ 19psi.
but since my lil disaster i haven't dynoed it over. will do soon and i'll keep u guys (& gals) posted.

edit: dynoed again.... 310whp/295wtq @ the same 20psi

goin back to see what it makes @ 26psi

Last edited by evo_gerard; Aug 22, 2010 at 07:05 PM.
Old Jul 22, 2009, 10:25 PM
  #22  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
fostytou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 3,143
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
FYI, E85 has been working out great. The car has felt a ton stronger since I put in a ghetto intake (from my DSM) with an AMSoil filter and ditched the stock airbox. I just need to make a heat shield for it now.
Old Jul 23, 2009, 12:52 AM
  #23  
Evolving Member
 
Tahoe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
EVO8 Stock Turbo with GSC S1 Cam Dyno sheet



English Racing just installed a GSC S1 cams and tuned for 93 (pump + torco)
40+ HP and 30+ Lb/feet gains by just adding a cam, scratch that,
by adding a great cam. Excellent HP/$$ gains. Car idles great as well

Adding another lb of boost raised TQ 4lb/ft but HP stayed flat.
To get more power, I would have the car tuned for Race Gas or E85

Last edited by Tahoe55; Jul 23, 2009 at 07:36 AM.
Old Jul 23, 2009, 05:28 AM
  #24  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
AWD_Terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice gains tahoe! Althogh it looks like you lost some serious low end? Am I seeing that right?
I just installed mine and hope to see gains like that!

Last edited by AWD_Terror; Jul 23, 2009 at 05:31 AM.
Old Jul 23, 2009, 07:48 AM
  #25  
Evolving Member
 
Tahoe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
AWD_Terror Wrote:
nice gains tahoe! Althogh it looks like you lost some serious low end? Am I seeing that right?
I just installed mine and hope to see gains like that!
AWD_Terror,
The chart is a little "busy" but if you look carefully you can see the torque lines are close through 4K RPM and the HP lines are similarly close through 4K rpm
You might be seeing the gap between TQ and HP as a loss. Actually my 309 max torque from before the S1 was a spike vs wide useable torque. With the GSC S1 cam, the torque curve has improved considerably as did the HP. The GSC is provides essentially the same torque and power curves as the stock cam through4K then starts to pull away from the stock cam till redline.

Hope you install qoes well. I know you will enjoy driving the car more. The response from 5K to redline is exhilirating.
Old Jul 23, 2009, 08:09 AM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
AWD_Terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tahoe55
AWD_Terror Wrote:


AWD_Terror,
The chart is a little "busy" but if you look carefully you can see the torque lines are close through 4K RPM and the HP lines are similarly close through 4K rpm
.
Sorry, i shoulda had coffee before I posted this morning. lol
Old Jul 24, 2009, 05:40 PM
  #27  
Evolving Member
 
Tahoe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AWD_Terror
Sorry, i shoulda had coffee before I posted this morning. lol
Your numbers are probably better than mine since you were dyno'd by a "heartbreaker". The Mustang does read lower than a Dynojet.
Old Jul 26, 2009, 04:38 AM
  #28  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
AWD_Terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im hoping to be in the 380s range on this same dyno with the cams in,. actually hoping to make 400 on that dyno, but 380s are more realistic
Old Jul 26, 2009, 09:40 AM
  #29  
Evolving Member
 
Tahoe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AWD_Terror
im hoping to be in the 380s range on this same dyno with the cams in,. actually hoping to make 400 on that dyno, but 380s are more realistic
Definitely discuss your goals with your tuner. I'm at about the top HP for 93 octane with my setup. My tuner, MidgetSpec at English Racing, said the highest they have seen on their dyno with stock turbo on 93 was ~ 372WHP.

If you want more power than your current configuration provides, your options include meth injection, race gas, or E85 depending on what you want to do with the car. My primary setup is for track and I have no plans to drag. This means I need a better torque curve more than I need maximum HP. I will probably get a race gas tune for the days I want to splurge on $8-$15 a gallon for 100 oct gas. E85 may be a future option when it becomes more available in my area.

Last edited by Tahoe55; Jul 26, 2009 at 09:54 AM.
Old Jul 27, 2009, 05:43 AM
  #30  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
AWD_Terror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i wanna do meth, but not this year.
I have a green, so the numbers should be doable. My tuner did 370-380 on the same dyno on his stock turbo. i think his is an 8 turbo, but he is on a little more boost and E85


Quick Reply: Dyno numbers for gsc s1`s AMS tune (post your gsc s1 dyno # here



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:39 AM.