EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

442whp/482wtq Stock Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2009, 11:19 AM
  #61  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
TTP Engineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central FL
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by RyuEvoIX
In theory that sounds about right and I'm still on the stock block as well with no head porting.

They made 468whp 491wtq on a dynojet so peak power wise I'm not far behind what they are currently making.
Our Mustang Dyno reads considerable less than a Dynojet 424x.

The cars power levels are much closer that one might think.
TTP Engineering is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 11:29 AM
  #62  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
LVSBB6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: CAN
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
great numbers, but why is the drop in power after 6000 rpm?
LVSBB6 is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 11:40 AM
  #63  
Newbie
 
35rEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: U.S.
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What do you expect from a stock turbo?
35rEvo is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 12:07 PM
  #64  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Cyloc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa Area
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Our Mustang Dyno reads considerable less than a Dynojet 424x.

The cars power levels are much closer that one might think.
Especially since they do not have the load baring dyno with the eddy currents. So right there each roller is missing about 1300 lb per roller missing. Even though each eddy current is on a bearing assembly the rolls pretty easy. They still cause a good amount of drag when rolling.
Cyloc is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 12:10 PM
  #65  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
evoracingstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: C.T
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
thats just crazyy!!
evoracingstar is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 12:11 PM
  #66  
Newbie
 
desmonddonte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Turbo Kyle
Very nice, it is indeed a great unit. Plus TTP is on point Wish I was there to go for a ride!!!

I cant wait to get another Evo. I miss my evo like a ****
you can live vicariously by helping me build mine
desmonddonte is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 12:20 PM
  #67  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
4kinboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: long island,ny
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by projectevo9
i agree with you guys...being a fat a$$ is a disadvantage.
+1

4kinboost is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 12:44 PM
  #68  
Newbie
 
SevenSins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: St. Paul
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
holy heck!! WOW, good job!!
SevenSins is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 01:31 PM
  #69  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
RyuEvoIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Our Mustang Dyno reads considerable less than a Dynojet 424x.

The cars power levels are much closer that one might think.
This is true. I forgot to account for the difference in Dynojet and Mustang dyno readings.
Last edited by RyuEvoIX; Jan 26, 2009 at 01:33 PM.
RyuEvoIX is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 01:43 PM
  #70  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RyuEvoIX
This is true. I forgot to account for the difference in Dynojet and Mustang dyno readings.

very true, the last car that came right off the Mustang and onto our dynojet we made +3hp baseline..
AWD Motorsports is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 01:49 PM
  #71  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Guerillah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How are power levels near the same with mostwanted having a ported head?
Guerillah is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 01:50 PM
  #72  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Guerillah
How are power levels near the same with mostwanted having a ported head?
The only conclusive way to know is to dyno the same day, same dyno and that isnt going to happen so its all just speculation..
AWD Motorsports is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 03:26 PM
  #73  
Account Disabled
 
Shacochis06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Our Mustang Dyno reads considerable less than a Dynojet 424x.

The cars power levels are much closer that one might think.
your dyno obvioulsy doesnt read "considerably less" than a dynojet....

id like to see any of these cars on a mustang dyno like CBRD and Buschurs..which basically have set the standard of MD #'s....i doubt itd even come close to 400...

like Mike said didnt one car go from your dyno to his dynojet and was only a 3hp difference?.....thats for another discussion tho


Nice numbers tho....and congrats on the 10 sec pass
Last edited by Shacochis06; Jan 26, 2009 at 03:29 PM.
Shacochis06 is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 05:22 PM
  #74  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Most-Wanted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by RyuEvoIX
They ran a 10.21 on a built motor with a 24xxLB race car Evo, one of the lightest Evo 7-9's ever, that can not be driven on the street. I have a 30xx daily driven street car. We are in a completely different class.
We're actually not in a different class. I set the stock turbo record and you have been unable to duplicate it or better it. So you have taken it upon yourself to make excuses like weight, etc. Not to mention now you are trying to sub categorize each mod component LOL.... Techincally your car is not even allowed to race since you are trying to avoid the standard NHRA regs like rollcage, engine diaper, scattershiled, etc. So I could sit here and whine how you arent playing fair and say if I have to run all the safety gear, so do you. Stop whining about the weight. I have over two hundred pounds of safety gear in the car including parachute. Where is your safety gear???? And technically your car is not street legal either. You have tampered with emissions and factory safety components.
Last edited by Most-Wanted; Jan 26, 2009 at 05:26 PM.
Most-Wanted is offline  
Like
Old Jan 26, 2009, 05:31 PM
  #75  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Most-Wanted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Our Mustang Dyno reads considerable less than a Dynojet 424x.

The cars power levels are much closer that one might think.
I see you guys love to reference me every chance you get. This is my response to this.
Sure they are
Last edited by Most-Wanted; Jan 26, 2009 at 05:40 PM.
Most-Wanted is offline  
Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: 442whp/482wtq Stock Turbo


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:09 PM.