Highest HP 4g63 engine (from 2007)
Mar 31, 2011, 03:56 AM
#545
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC via Puerto Rico
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I see them things all the time here at work..... we use them to crank our C-130 engines....lolololololol
Amazing work guys. I thought a BW S400 was big enough shoved in an EVO, but thst thing is something else. Looking fwd to see it mounted. Again, amazing work
Amazing work guys. I thought a BW S400 was big enough shoved in an EVO, but thst thing is something else. Looking fwd to see it mounted. Again, amazing work
Mar 31, 2011, 04:14 AM
#547
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Greece, Athens
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This turbo is not for an evo.
It never gonna spool.
It don't think the exhaust gases can even rotate this wheel at idle!!!
The 1300hp turbo is good enough for me.i don't think i need more power.
Amazing work.
It never gonna spool.
It don't think the exhaust gases can even rotate this wheel at idle!!!
The 1300hp turbo is good enough for me.i don't think i need more power.
Amazing work.
Apr 1, 2011, 02:13 AM
#550
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maputo, MZ
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DAMNNNNN....the thing is almost the size of the engine! Will it even spool, where will you mount it??? You have to show us some videos of this thing mounted on the car (this is a MUST)!!! I have to pick up my 
now
now
Apr 14, 2011, 11:20 PM
#553
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: finland
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spyros, out of curiosity, are you going to run balance shafts in the billet block? how are you going to handle the 2nd harmonics with such a high rpm engine ? or do you just take them into account when calculating the stresses on the engine mounts and other parts?
Apr 16, 2011, 12:04 AM
#554
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
Hi,
The turbo is for the prostock Linde Markus project.
We are about to finish the 2000hp project, i will update sortly.
Next post i will show to u the best and lighter flywheel from billet or titanium for 4g63 suitable for most known 3.5'', 4.5'',5.5'' and 7.25'' clutches on the market. 2-3-4-5 plate systems capable.
From 750lb-ft capacity to 1780lb-ft.
Lekonna, no balance shafts. All the parts are 0 balanced it self.
The turbo is for the prostock Linde Markus project.
We are about to finish the 2000hp project, i will update sortly.
Next post i will show to u the best and lighter flywheel from billet or titanium for 4g63 suitable for most known 3.5'', 4.5'',5.5'' and 7.25'' clutches on the market. 2-3-4-5 plate systems capable.
From 750lb-ft capacity to 1780lb-ft.
Lekonna, no balance shafts. All the parts are 0 balanced it self.
Apr 17, 2011, 12:28 AM
#555
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: finland
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
though i think it is impossible to balance 4 stroke inline 4-cyl by just balancing the parts since the pistons coming down will be moving at different acceleration than the pistons going up. (due to the geometrics involved) so piston travels different length near TDC than BDC at same crank angle.
It seems to me that most engine builders eliminate the balance shafts, but i'd like to know more about the theory why it is done. The rotating mass is not that big since the weight is very much near the center of the shafts, they do run at 2x the speed which might cause lubrication problems on a high rpm machine though.