Ported Manifold Dyno Comparison: Buschur vs MAP Rev2
#17
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
To me the data appears to be within the noise. You have to understand there is too much variability for anyone to definitively claim an increase in power. Even if I look at the two curves for just the MAP manifold I see variations of 5-10hp. Is this to say the MAP port is worth 5hp over the same MAP port?
I would venture to say that if you took 10 dyno runs using the busher port and 10 dyno runs using the MAP port at random times you will find a percentage of butcher manifolds that read higher gains.
I think the MAP stuff looks great and I am clearly not a busher fan, but the data doesn't support these claims that the MAP porting is better.
Bucher - $95
MAP - $225
Picking the real winner is easy.
I would venture to say that if you took 10 dyno runs using the busher port and 10 dyno runs using the MAP port at random times you will find a percentage of butcher manifolds that read higher gains.
I think the MAP stuff looks great and I am clearly not a busher fan, but the data doesn't support these claims that the MAP porting is better.
Bucher - $95
MAP - $225
Picking the real winner is easy.
Last edited by 240Z TwinTurbo; Dec 16, 2009 at 10:20 AM.
#18
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
To me the data appears to be within the noise. You have to understand there is too much variability for anyone to definitively claim an increase in power. Even if I look at the two curves for just the MAP manifold I see variations of 5-10hp. Is this to say the MAP port is worth 5hp over the same MAP port?
I would venture to say that if you took 10 dyno runs using the busher port and 10 dyno runs using the MAP port at random times you will find a percentage of butcher manifolds that read higher gains.
I think the MAP stuff looks great and I am clearly not a busher fan, but the data doesn't support these claims that the MAP porting is better.
Bucher - $95
MAP - $225
Picking the real winner is easy.
I would venture to say that if you took 10 dyno runs using the busher port and 10 dyno runs using the MAP port at random times you will find a percentage of butcher manifolds that read higher gains.
I think the MAP stuff looks great and I am clearly not a busher fan, but the data doesn't support these claims that the MAP porting is better.
Bucher - $95
MAP - $225
Picking the real winner is easy.
Mike
#30
To me the data appears to be within the noise. You have to understand there is too much variability for anyone to definitively claim an increase in power. Even if I look at the two curves for just the MAP manifold I see variations of 5-10hp. Is this to say the MAP port is worth 5hp over the same MAP port?
I would venture to say that if you took 10 dyno runs using the busher port and 10 dyno runs using the MAP port at random times you will find a percentage of butcher manifolds that read higher gains.
I think the MAP stuff looks great and I am clearly not a busher fan, but the data doesn't support these claims that the MAP porting is better.
Bucher - $95
MAP - $225
Picking the real winner is easy.
I would venture to say that if you took 10 dyno runs using the busher port and 10 dyno runs using the MAP port at random times you will find a percentage of butcher manifolds that read higher gains.
I think the MAP stuff looks great and I am clearly not a busher fan, but the data doesn't support these claims that the MAP porting is better.
Bucher - $95
MAP - $225
Picking the real winner is easy.
Still nice to see them putting the money and time into trying to make products better than the competition. MAP still gets an A++ in my book.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChrisCarey
Evo X Dyno Results
60
Mar 5, 2012 09:23 AM
scheides
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
12
Nov 20, 2008 05:49 PM