BBK Full + SD + 91 + Tephra V7
Jan 18, 2010 | 03:36 PM
#32
Not for nothing u have no clue of what your talking about your gonna swap out your red for a bbk full why to touch 500 whp?With the setup up you have now on e85 or meth with around 31psi u can touch and make more then 500 whp with a blink of un eye i offered u advise and told u to check your pm for a msg but you'll learn from your own mistake's..Also forgot to mention i made 500 whp with a red on 30 psi with no cams ..intercooler piping,or any porting ,and three boost leaks it's all in the combo and tune my friend i think u need to find your self a good tuner..Look at the graph it's just peak numbers i would smoke this thing with my red..
Jan 18, 2010 | 03:54 PM
#33
Jan 18, 2010 | 04:05 PM
#34
Evolving Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
So far I have not had any issues with the APS unit. It is only slightly louder than the Stock DV which I like. I will know more about how it reacts next time I'm out at the track, as this car is not my DD anymore.
Jan 18, 2010 | 04:07 PM
#35
Evolving Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Jan 18, 2010 | 04:13 PM
#37
the rally cat is a 3" resonated test pipe with a real cat heatshield surrounding it (to look like a real cat incase 5-0 gets nosey)
So far I have not had any issues with the APS unit. It is only slightly louder than the Stock DV which I like. I will know more about how it reacts next time I'm out at the track, as this car is not my DD anymore.
So far I have not had any issues with the APS unit. It is only slightly louder than the Stock DV which I like. I will know more about how it reacts next time I'm out at the track, as this car is not my DD anymore.
Jan 18, 2010 | 05:41 PM
#38
The BBK has the spool advantage over the red for sure and so far the BBK has been outperforming the FPred on 91 pump gas on our dyno.
For a stock motor, daily driven street car in California, the CBRD BBK Full is a great choice.
Bryan,
Do you think the gains were made from just removing the MAF? If you replaced the AEM Dryflow with a K&N, I would think that alone could gain some. Did the car take more timing running SD? Leaner AFR with SD? If you don't want to release this information, I understand.
Do you think the gains were made from just removing the MAF? If you replaced the AEM Dryflow with a K&N, I would think that alone could gain some. Did the car take more timing running SD? Leaner AFR with SD? If you don't want to release this information, I understand.
Same timing and AFR on both tunes. SD tune had slightly more boost up top as a by product of running no MAF.
I think the Kelford cams had a bit to do with this power as well.
Jan 18, 2010 | 07:05 PM
#39
Account Disabled
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: non of your business
Jan 18, 2010 | 07:07 PM
#40
Account Disabled
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: non of your business
On paper the FPred should make more power then the BBK Full on a proper set up Evo like this. I just haven't seen it happen it, but I would imagine it's just a matter of time.
The BBK has the spool advantage over the red for sure and so far the BBK has been outperforming the FPred on 91 pump gas on our dyno.
For a stock motor, daily driven street car in California, the CBRD BBK Full is a great choice.
It actually went from a AEM cone filter with the MAF to no MAF with a AEM Dryflow.
Same timing and AFR on both tunes. SD tune had slightly more boost up top as a by product of running no MAF.
I think the Kelford cams had a bit to do with this power as well.
The BBK has the spool advantage over the red for sure and so far the BBK has been outperforming the FPred on 91 pump gas on our dyno.
For a stock motor, daily driven street car in California, the CBRD BBK Full is a great choice.
It actually went from a AEM cone filter with the MAF to no MAF with a AEM Dryflow.
Same timing and AFR on both tunes. SD tune had slightly more boost up top as a by product of running no MAF.
I think the Kelford cams had a bit to do with this power as well.
