Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

BBK Full turbo 93 octane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2010, 06:11 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
evo4life400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBK Full turbo 93 octane

hey everyone i got my evo tuned today by junior at The Shop in CT and i am very pleased with my numbers. we agreed to stop at only 25psi because this car needs to last for me and i was more than happy with the results! thanks jimmy and junior!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXCMuOje_pY
Old Mar 12, 2010, 06:15 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Evoryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ☼ Florida ☼
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
That's nice
Old Mar 12, 2010, 06:58 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
kouzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
congrat man!

Junior is the man!
Old Mar 12, 2010, 07:20 PM
  #4  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
evo4life400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks guys!! the car scares the he'll out of me
Old Mar 12, 2010, 07:41 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Evo_Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Posts: 3,419
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Correction factor? Mode?
Old Mar 12, 2010, 07:48 PM
  #6  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
digitalmethods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice. Do you have before and after numbers for the cams?
Old Mar 12, 2010, 08:37 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
evo4life400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with a 1.0 correction i made 370 or something like that. he said i would trap over 120 though!!!

as for the cams...i do not have a before and after but they definitely help!!!
Old Mar 12, 2010, 08:42 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
kouzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by evo4life400
with a 1.0 correction i made 370 or something like that. he said i would trap over 120 though!!!

as for the cams...i do not have a before and after but they definitely help!!!
he is right.

when i had the 3065 on the car at 372 on 1.0 i was trapping 121 full weight on pump and thats a fact...
Old Mar 12, 2010, 08:47 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
evo4life400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kouzman
he is right.

when i had the 3065 on the car at 372 on 1.0 i was trapping 121 full weight on pump and thats a fact...
hey man, thats funny you posted here....junior was mentioning you today when we were talking about if i should raise the boost anymore or not
Old Mar 12, 2010, 08:55 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
kouzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
personally i would drive the car as is.

at your power level you have a very fast car with a lot of midrange. you can of course increase boost but if you are on the stock block i would prefer to keep things safe. You cn get a tune for the track if you drag race but for road racing or street driving i would just enjoy the car!
Old Mar 12, 2010, 09:03 PM
  #11  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
evo4life400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kouzman
personally i would drive the car as is.

at your power level you have a very fast car with a lot of midrange. you can of course increase boost but if you are on the stock block i would prefer to keep things safe. You cn get a tune for the track if you drag race but for road racing or street driving i would just enjoy the car!
yeah i dont plan on tracking the car so i am very happy with the results. i am good the way the car is!
Old Mar 12, 2010, 09:26 PM
  #12  
Evolving Member
 
Brsox10288's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Md
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nice numbers man!
Old Mar 12, 2010, 09:37 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Evo_Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Posts: 3,419
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by evo4life400
with a 1.0 correction i made 370 or something like that. he said i would trap over 120 though!!!

as for the cams...i do not have a before and after but they definitely help!!!
So what correction factor was it at for the 444 Run?

Wait let me guess... 444/370= 1.20

Why so much correction factor? Most people use 1.15 to get dynojet numbers, but...?


No trying to hate and/or start another stupid dyno/CF debate/argument, but ..........

Also why not just post up the CF 1.00 chart?
Old Mar 12, 2010, 10:55 PM
  #14  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
atkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: delaware
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shoot out mode?????? Standardized
Old Mar 13, 2010, 03:06 AM
  #15  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (11)
 
evo4life400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northeast
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 1.00 correction is in that graph as well......i could have easily went to 28psi but i liked it right where it was and so did junior on a pretty low boost level


Quick Reply: BBK Full turbo 93 octane



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:12 PM.