2.3L stroker JMfab powered 3082r E85 numbers
#19
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ephrata, PA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm pretty sure you're confused with another shop--JMF does not offer any service other than fabrication and installing our own parts on customers cars once in a blue moon if requested. In 2003 I think Jim the owner was still working out of his garage if he even was in business at that point.
#20
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
I'm pretty sure you're confused with another shop--JMF does not offer any service other than fabrication and installing our own parts on customers cars once in a blue moon if requested. In 2003 I think Jim the owner was still working out of his garage if he even was in business at that point.
#22
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my apologies if it was a different car. It was a white evo 8 with carbon fiber trunk and cf hood and jdm heads/tails.. it was def in 2003-2004. It might of been a different shop, i just visited the site and it looked familar, so sorry if it was a different shop.. but either way good tune.
Thanks man, appreciate it
great #'s.
Sorry if I missed it but was this a 3rd or 4th gear pull?
Sorry if I missed it but was this a 3rd or 4th gear pull?
#23
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
I am not a big fan of relatively small backsides on larger displacement engines. Having said that I am nonetheless impressed with your results.
Still, I would be curious to see a comparison between the 3065 and a full house 35, or better yet, a 3586 on your engine. I would think that the smaller hotside is holding you back. There is a tradeoff. I can see a 3065 on a 2-Litre mill but not on a stroker. However, that is just my opinion. Again....nice numbers
Still, I would be curious to see a comparison between the 3065 and a full house 35, or better yet, a 3586 on your engine. I would think that the smaller hotside is holding you back. There is a tradeoff. I can see a 3065 on a 2-Litre mill but not on a stroker. However, that is just my opinion. Again....nice numbers
#24
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not a big fan of relatively small backsides on larger displacement engines. Having said that I am nonetheless impressed with your results.
Still, I would be curious to see a comparison between the 3065 and a full house 35, or better yet, a 3586 on your engine. I would think that the smaller hotside is holding you back. There is a tradeoff. I can see a 3065 on a 2-Litre mill but not on a stroker. However, that is just my opinion. Again....nice numbers
Still, I would be curious to see a comparison between the 3065 and a full house 35, or better yet, a 3586 on your engine. I would think that the smaller hotside is holding you back. There is a tradeoff. I can see a 3065 on a 2-Litre mill but not on a stroker. However, that is just my opinion. Again....nice numbers
I am 100% with ya on this. The small exhaust wheel on this 3065 just isn't cutting it for the stroker. Past 7000rpm the motor just starts to run away from the turbo. I am limited to 31-32lbs of boost as if I try to turn it up anymore the wastegate won't even open, it's done lol. BUT the little damn thing is making incredible power, I never expected this thing to make this much power, but it is. And it is a blast to drive on the street. Getting 31lbs by 4300-4400rpm is fun, tires don't tend to like it much though haha
I would love to see what a 3586 would do on my car, I know it would be night and day difference. But for now I think I will toss the 1.06 A/R exhaust housing on this turbo and see how much further I can with it. Currently it has the .82 A/R housing on it now. I think the 1.06 will open it up a bit and give me a little more boost. If that doesn't do it then it's time for the hta 3586
Either way it will end up getting a HTA 3586r sooner or later.
And thanks man!
Last edited by evodude32; Jun 17, 2010 at 10:00 PM.
#25
What are the uncorrected numbers without weather or altitude correction? I know that altitude correction tends to skew #'s way higher than the actual difference is. Usually it is about 2x the adjustment then what would actually happen.
#27
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The dyno sheet I posted is uncorrected everything, no corrections on the dyno sheet, meaning the 622whp is what it did at that very moment with no corrections. Corrected numbers were 685, uncorrected numbers were 622whp (dyno sheet posted on page 1)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FS[Northeast]: JMFab T3 Exhaust manifold
dacowgod
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
0
Dec 6, 2016 05:12 AM
Its a 7
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
16
Mar 21, 2012 08:14 PM
FiD-Turbo.com
Vendor Announcements
18
Sep 9, 2010 05:20 AM
evil_eagle
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
74
Apr 7, 2009 07:27 PM
106ar, 23, 24l, 3082, 3082r, e85, evolutionm, forced, gt30r, horsepower, hta, performance, record, stroker, vband