Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

CBRD's BBK-B.. 457whp/365wtq on 93..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 05:56 AM
  #106  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,604
Likes: 96
From: Northern Virginia
You guys are killing me with the age comments. I got my first Evo when I was 33...in 2003.
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 05:59 AM
  #107  
TURBevO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: PA
^Have you guys driven a BBK Full car? The spool is seriously like stock. The BBK-B is like 200 RPM "laggier" than the Full. I think I can deal with 200-300 RPM of lag over the stock turbo to hit 400+whp on the CBRD dyno. If I wouldnt have driven a kid's car with the Full I would probably feel the same way about the lag issues, etc. But having driven one, I can totally take on a couple more RPM for 30+ more whp. Just my $0.02.

PS: Bought my EVO at 22, now 28, and never plan to sell it! haha....
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 08:20 AM
  #108  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 130
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by TURBevO8
^Have you guys driven a BBK Full car? The spool is seriously like stock. The BBK-B is like 200 RPM "laggier" than the Full. I think I can deal with 200-300 RPM of lag over the stock turbo to hit 400+whp on the CBRD dyno. If I wouldnt have driven a kid's car with the Full I would probably feel the same way about the lag issues, etc. But having driven one, I can totally take on a couple more RPM for 30+ more whp. Just my $0.02.

PS: Bought my EVO at 22, now 28, and never plan to sell it! haha....
I think the current discussion is more about the transient response than it is the powerband of the turbo.
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 08:30 AM
  #109  
Blitz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 3
From: Earth
Originally Posted by TURBevO8
I think I can deal with 200-300 RPM of lag over the stock turbo to hit 400+whp on the CBRD dyno.
The Full will hit around 400 whp on their dyno on pump gas with the right supporting mods. 450 whp on E85 or 110 or whatever. If the goal is 400, you shouldn't need the B. If the goal is 500, it's probably a better choice for you.
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 08:48 AM
  #110  
whtrice's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 55
From: Sacramento
Yup!!!! When you talk power in turbos it's like discussing how hot looking a gal is.
Transient response is like discussing her housekeeping skills.

Power is always the OMG....chatter subject.

Transient response, just as important at least to me, because it's the attitude you will have to live with.

What do I know....just OG banter.....lol



Originally Posted by mrfred
I think the current discussion is more about the transient response than it is the powerband of the turbo.

Last edited by whtrice; Jul 21, 2010 at 01:29 PM.
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 11:13 AM
  #111  
vmrevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 6
From: Huntsville, AL
Originally Posted by TURBevO8
^Have you guys driven a BBK Full car? The spool is seriously like stock. The BBK-B is like 200 RPM "laggier" than the Full. I think I can deal with 200-300 RPM of lag over the stock turbo to hit 400+whp on the CBRD dyno. If I wouldnt have driven a kid's car with the Full I would probably feel the same way about the lag issues, etc. But having driven one, I can totally take on a couple more RPM for 30+ more whp. Just my $0.02.

PS: Bought my EVO at 22, now 28, and never plan to sell it! haha....
and thats exactly why i was wondering about the differences in the 2 turbos. the BBK-B will be a great turbo to grow with. if the full spools like stock and the Bis around 200-300 rpm slower i think i can definitely live with that!!!
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #112  
TURBevO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by Blitz
The Full will hit around 400 whp on their dyno on pump gas with the right supporting mods. 450 whp on E85 or 110 or whatever. If the goal is 400, you shouldn't need the B. If the goal is 500, it's probably a better choice for you.
Yeah, by supporting mods you mean own a IX, not a VIII, and do a stage 3 head, if not also add a sheet metal IM and more aggressive cams and valvetrain, open wastegate, etc, etc as seen on all the other cars tuned up there on the Full. Not worth all those mods and money for the sake of 200RPM (to me at least). My goal is not 400 but rather as much as possible with the 200 RPM tradeoff. If it does 430whp, bonus. "Typical bolt-ons" and the Full make around 360-380whp on that dyno. Now I will get flamed for "typical bolt-ons"....

Last edited by TURBevO8; Jul 21, 2010 at 01:22 PM.
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 01:19 PM
  #113  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,655
Likes: 245
From: US
Originally Posted by Blitz
I spoke with Chad at length about this when I ordered my Full a few months ago. I knew the B was coming this summer and wanted his honest opinion. Chad made it clear to me that the B would not be replacing the Full. Just another alternative for those who favor slightly better top end over slightly better spool. That's why I went with the Full. My argument is that there is always the FP Red/Black if top end is the priority.
ahh gotcha. thanks yeah i'll definitely just be waiting to see the final overlay to make my decision. as of now in terms of response and spool it sounds like the bbkfull will be the way to go, and just port everything.. i dont need a ton of power, just a little bit more than i'm making now.... for now anyway
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 03:47 PM
  #114  
Blitz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 3
From: Earth
Originally Posted by TURBevO8
Yeah, by supporting mods you mean own a IX, not a VIII, and do a stage 3 head, if not also add a sheet metal IM and more aggressive cams and valvetrain, open wastegate, etc, etc as seen on all the other cars tuned up there on the Full. Not worth all those mods and money for the sake of 200RPM (to me at least). My goal is not 400 but rather as much as possible with the 200 RPM tradeoff. If it does 430whp, bonus. "Typical bolt-ons" and the Full make around 360-380whp on that dyno. Now I will get flamed for "typical bolt-ons"....
Hmmm. We'll see what mine does when I take it to CBRD soon.
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 07:06 PM
  #115  
TURBevO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by Blitz
Hmmm. We'll see what mine does when I take it to CBRD soon.
Looking forward to more results from both turbos. The BBK results thread has been dead for a while.
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 07:13 PM
  #116  
atkins's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: delaware
Originally Posted by TURBevO8
Yeah, by supporting mods you mean own a IX, not a VIII, and do a stage 3 head, if not also add a sheet metal IM and more aggressive cams and valvetrain, open wastegate, etc, etc as seen on all the other cars tuned up there on the Full. Not worth all those mods and money for the sake of 200RPM (to me at least). My goal is not 400 but rather as much as possible with the 200 RPM tradeoff. If it does 430whp, bonus. "Typical bolt-ons" and the Full make around 360-380whp on that dyno. Now I will get flamed for "typical bolt-ons"....
i do have a 9 but no sheet metal intake manifold or headwork or open wastegate and was able to get to 400 on cbrds dyno so it is not impossible. im sure the s2 cams did help but we didnt rev over 8 grand so i wasnt abusing the valve train.

just thought i would put that out there

jeff
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 07:15 PM
  #117  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,655
Likes: 245
From: US
Originally Posted by TURBevO8
Yeah, by supporting mods you mean own a IX, not a VIII, and do a stage 3 head, if not also add a sheet metal IM and more aggressive cams and valvetrain, open wastegate, etc, etc as seen on all the other cars tuned up there on the Full. Not worth all those mods and money for the sake of 200RPM (to me at least). My goal is not 400 but rather as much as possible with the 200 RPM tradeoff. If it does 430whp, bonus. "Typical bolt-ons" and the Full make around 360-380whp on that dyno. Now I will get flamed for "typical bolt-ons"....
360-380 for an vii or a ix? or doesn't matter?
Old Jul 21, 2010 | 07:52 PM
  #118  
drop24's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 483
Likes: 1
From: Canada/Japan
Chad what do you think this car would have done on 91 octane? Or would your recommend running the Full for lower octane fuel?
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 01:36 AM
  #119  
EvolutinIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
From: Rio Rancho NM
Originally Posted by whtrice
Yup!!!! When you talk power in turbos it's like discussing how hot looking a gal is.
Transient response is like discussing her housekeeping skills.

Power is always the OMG....chatter subject.

Transient response, just as important at least to me, because it's the attitude you will have to live with.

What do I know....just OG banter.....lol
Lmao! Let the house get dirty, I'll just sit back and let her hott a$$ not clean! I'll give up a few hundred rpm of spool for more top end power!
Old Jul 22, 2010 | 05:43 AM
  #120  
TURBevO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by kyooch
360-380 for an vii or a ix? or doesn't matter?
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/se...ts-thread.html



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:54 PM.