EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Tobz built BR 2.3 FP black e85= Awesome trq!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2010, 06:00 PM
  #31  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
That's one bad mother.
Sharkbite2000 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 6, 2010, 07:22 PM
  #32  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: VaBeach, VA
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Looks nice dude! Killer tq! Congrats!

Mikey
BLKCarbonEVO is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 6, 2010, 08:25 PM
  #33  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
EVODreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to complain but that video seemed like a 300-400 hp pull. Sure was lack luster for something that had some serious power. I am confused?
EVODreams is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 6, 2010, 08:31 PM
  #34  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
tscompusa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: pa
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by EVODreams
Not to complain but that video seemed like a 300-400 hp pull. Sure was lack luster for something that had some serious power. I am confused?
strapped down very tight most likely. thats how it should look!
tscompusa2 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 6, 2010, 09:47 PM
  #35  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
italianevo88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: south chicago IL
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FQ4OO
awesome setup! Almost 40psi is mad!
hell yeah it is
italianevo88 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 6, 2010, 10:38 PM
  #36  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
project_skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lets not forget this is 5000+ Ft above sea level. Great work tobz! You da man.
project_skyline is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 7, 2010, 01:26 AM
  #37  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (15)
 
tobz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVODreams
Not to complain but that video seemed like a 300-400 hp pull. Sure was lack luster for something that had some serious power. I am confused?
It seems like that because the power comes on so fast and pulls so strong the whole pull, but on the road its totally different.

Maybe we can get some in car video shots.
tobz is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 7, 2010, 05:19 AM
  #38  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Sicboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Boulder colorado
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tobz
It seems like that because the power comes on so fast and pulls so strong the whole pull, but on the road its totally different.

Maybe we can get some in car video shots.

I'm down for some in car video shots
Sicboy is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 7, 2010, 06:35 AM
  #39  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
batty200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by project_skyline
Lets not forget this is 5000+ Ft above sea level. Great work tobz! You da man.
What is the correction factor? At high elevations the CF is way off on a turbo car. I usually see 2x the correction that is realistic at high altitude. If it is uncorrected then that is awesome.

Congrats.
batty200 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 7, 2010, 06:47 AM
  #40  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
EVODreams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess I should restate it looks so smooth and that is why it didn't seem as powerful. Something with that much torque I would think would look like it was going to leap off of the dyno. I didn't mean my comment as a negative. Damn def tone text on a screen.lol
EVODreams is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 7, 2010, 08:02 AM
  #41  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Timmay81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by batty200
What is the correction factor? At high elevations the CF is way off on a turbo car. I usually see 2x the correction that is realistic at high altitude. If it is uncorrected then that is awesome.

Congrats.
i would think that those numbers are with no correction factor
Timmay81 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 7, 2010, 10:47 AM
  #42  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (15)
 
tobz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CF was 1.20. We are in Denver.
tobz is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 7, 2010, 11:02 AM
  #43  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Timmay81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
what were uncorrected numbers? Makes me wonder how much more my setup is able to do, im on the stock 2.0 making 550 on about 30lbs, id have to check the correction factor as we are 4500 feet, i know my uncorrected numbers were just over 500


edit- i also had a 1.20 correction using superflow
Timmay81 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 7, 2010, 11:12 AM
  #44  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (15)
 
tobz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
take 20% off
tobz is offline  
Reply Like
Old Jul 7, 2010, 11:41 AM
  #45  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Timmay81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
superflow has a few different readings

DJpwer(dyno jet readings) im at 550
STP power is 520 with a 1.206
SAE is about 500 with a 1.15
Timmay81 is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Tobz built BR 2.3 FP black e85= Awesome trq!!!!


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:16 AM.