05 Evo- ported IX on E85 438Tq/417Whp
Jul 14, 2010, 10:46 PM
#1
05 Evo- ported IX on E85 438Tq/417Whp
The thread title lies.
Updated dyno after TB boost leak fix (thanks MIL SPEC)and BOV change
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
412tq/403whp.
Retuned for larger DP (2.75->3in) and from RRE HFC to Gruppe-S test pipe.
438/417
TB shaft seal fix and Forge RS(9 clicks)
450/443
AEM Intake, IX turbo hotside hand ported and coated, 3in DP, Gruppe-S resonated test pipe, RRE Stealth exhaust, HKS 272s, BC cam gears +1/-1, 3-port BCS, Nisei FMIC, Nisei LICP, RC1000s, Forge RS BOV, load based boost control, light flywheel, light crank pulley, ARP studs, blox mount, beatrush diff bushings, E-85, boost peak to 30 and taper to 24 at redline.
peak torque at 3650, peak whp at 6200. Over 400 lb/ft from 3200 to 5600.
Updated dyno after TB boost leak fix (thanks MIL SPEC)and BOV change
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
412tq/403whp.
Retuned for larger DP (2.75->3in) and from RRE HFC to Gruppe-S test pipe.
438/417
TB shaft seal fix and Forge RS(9 clicks)
450/443
AEM Intake, IX turbo hotside hand ported and coated, 3in DP, Gruppe-S resonated test pipe, RRE Stealth exhaust, HKS 272s, BC cam gears +1/-1, 3-port BCS, Nisei FMIC, Nisei LICP, RC1000s, Forge RS BOV, load based boost control, light flywheel, light crank pulley, ARP studs, blox mount, beatrush diff bushings, E-85, boost peak to 30 and taper to 24 at redline.
peak torque at 3650, peak whp at 6200. Over 400 lb/ft from 3200 to 5600.
Last edited by ViscoS2000; Aug 24, 2011 at 06:33 PM. Reason: new dyno plot
and 
Trending Topics
Aug 23, 2011, 03:30 PM
#12
I'm sure you're making good power but if I were a betting man I would bet that the dyno you are using is reading a bit high considering your mods. I'm sure it's a blast to drive though. On second look at that dyno sheet it looks as though it's estimating flywheel horsepower. Makes sense now.
Last edited by 4xforce; Aug 23, 2011 at 03:32 PM.
Aug 23, 2011, 05:29 PM
#13
Sorry for the offtopic OP.. looks like a Dynapack to me (measures power at wheel hubs). They read close to Dynojet. 5 years ago I made 340whp on a Dynapack then a few days later made 335whp on a Dynojet with the addition of a test pipe and nothing else changed tune/boost/part wise. I'll share if the OP wants me to.
Nice! Have to love E and the stock turbo!!
Nice! Have to love E and the stock turbo!!
Last edited by boostedwrx; Aug 23, 2011 at 05:33 PM.
Aug 23, 2011, 07:35 PM
#14
For comparison sake look at this:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...tang-dyno.html
A more well thought out parts lineup and making 360 something on a mustang. Give that 8-10% for a dynojet number and you see what I'm saying. I'm not knocking this dudes results I just don't want him to be misled or misinformed. Of course I could be wrong bit I still think there is something missing to explain these numbers here.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...tang-dyno.html
A more well thought out parts lineup and making 360 something on a mustang. Give that 8-10% for a dynojet number and you see what I'm saying. I'm not knocking this dudes results I just don't want him to be misled or misinformed. Of course I could be wrong bit I still think there is something missing to explain these numbers here.
Aug 23, 2011, 07:45 PM
#15
For comparison sake look at this:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...tang-dyno.html
A more well thought out parts lineup and making 360 something on a mustang. Give that 8-10% for a dynojet number and you see what I'm saying. I'm not knocking this dudes results I just don't want him to be misled or misinformed. Of course I could be wrong bit I still think there is something missing to explain these numbers here.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...tang-dyno.html
A more well thought out parts lineup and making 360 something on a mustang. Give that 8-10% for a dynojet number and you see what I'm saying. I'm not knocking this dudes results I just don't want him to be misled or misinformed. Of course I could be wrong bit I still think there is something missing to explain these numbers here.