Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2.3+6262 at a Mile high!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 5, 2010, 12:26 PM
  #16  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Posts: 3,043
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Nice work!
Old Aug 5, 2010, 12:40 PM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Magnumpsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Who Knows
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boosted Tuning
Uncorrected numbers would be

91oct - 448hp/352tq

91/meth - 518hp/485tq



An EVO only weighs 3263


I know the weight. Mustang tells you to use this weight as well as that HP@50. It is correct for "mustang" numbers if this makes sense.
Old Aug 5, 2010, 12:57 PM
  #18  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
jasnm21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Abq, NM
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boosted Tuning
Uncorrected numbers would be

91oct - 448hp/352tq

91/meth - 518hp/485tq



An EVO only weighs 3263
I know, I just didn't add the &meth part. Sorry. lol Then to get a fair DJ add 13%, 585. Then if you want a closer estimate of what it would be at sea level on a dynojet add 10%, 643. So basically at the original CF it is reading like a dynojet at sea level.
Old Aug 5, 2010, 01:14 PM
  #19  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Magnumpsi
I know the weight. Mustang tells you to use this weight as well as that HP@50. It is correct for "mustang" numbers if this makes sense.
Yeah, I have always wondered why mustang has the incorrect weight for cars. Just the way their dyno works I suppose.

Originally Posted by jasnm21
I know, I just didn't add the &meth part. Sorry. lol Then to get a fair DJ add 13%, 585. Then if you want a closer estimate of what it would be at sea level on a dynojet add 10%, 643. So basically at the original CF it is reading like a dynojet at sea level.
This should be put as a disclaimer in the first post.
Old Aug 5, 2010, 01:17 PM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Magnumpsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Who Knows
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boosted Tuning
Yeah, I have always wondered why mustang has the incorrect weight for cars. Just the way their dyno works I suppose.


Yeah kind of strange how there weights are so high.

Mitch
Old Aug 5, 2010, 05:21 PM
  #21  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (15)
 
tobz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
His weight is right on, customer weighs 200, tv's, stereos and all the other stuff he has in there also really add up.

Weight is right on!
Old Aug 5, 2010, 07:39 PM
  #22  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
...

Last edited by Boosted Tuning; Aug 5, 2010 at 09:12 PM.
Old Aug 5, 2010, 09:35 PM
  #23  
Evolving Member
 
diambo4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: OKC
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No wonder people don't give a crap about dyno numbers with you people fudging up numbers with correction factors. You are running a turbo car STOP USING ALTITUDE CORRECTION FACTORS!
Old Aug 5, 2010, 11:48 PM
  #24  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
jasnm21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Abq, NM
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by diambo4life
No wonder people don't give a crap about dyno numbers with you people fudging up numbers with correction factors. You are running a turbo car STOP USING ALTITUDE CORRECTION FACTORS!
There is a correct correction factor unfortunately the dyno operators don't buy everything they need to get the correct CF. I talked to a DJ rep and he said that if they used all of the sensors that they offer they would get closer to actually correction factors. He said that it is closer to 10% rather than the 20%+ that most shops use. I personally HATE correction factors.

But in their, tobz, defense, if someone came to him with more mods compared to a friend and dynoed less than him. That person might not understand how CFs work and ask why his car is low on power. Not every person is smart enough to understand when they are being lied to. There are plenty of examples on here about this from former vendors. It's a shame.

Great job with the build Tobz and Mitch
Old Aug 10, 2010, 02:34 PM
  #25  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Motor-Rx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver,Co
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by diambo4life
no wonder people don't give a crap about dyno numbers with you people fudging up numbers with correction factors. You are running a turbo car stop using altitude correction factors!



eww what you say to that TOBZ!!!!!!

Last edited by Motor-Rx; Aug 10, 2010 at 02:37 PM.
Old Aug 10, 2010, 05:49 PM
  #26  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
William254's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Rio Rancho
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
congrats bro! nowcome to abq. put in some e85 40+psi and go for broke!
Old Aug 10, 2010, 06:00 PM
  #27  
Newbie
 
BlackPearlZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Boynton Beach, FL
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
great numbers! I love those precision turbos
Old Aug 10, 2010, 07:18 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
TwStDeVo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 5o5
Posts: 1,672
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by William254
congrats bro! nowcome to abq. put in some e85 40+psi and go for broke!
lol well that will be hard since my car is far from being light. im hoping someone sets up an end of summer meet. ive missed all of them so far but i would really like to attend one now that my car is fully done.
Old Aug 10, 2010, 07:24 PM
  #29  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
TwStDeVo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 5o5
Posts: 1,672
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by diambo4life
No wonder people don't give a crap about dyno numbers with you people fudging up numbers with correction factors. You are running a turbo car STOP USING ALTITUDE CORRECTION FACTORS!
Originally Posted by jasnm21
There is a correct correction factor unfortunately the dyno operators don't buy everything they need to get the correct CF. I talked to a DJ rep and he said that if they used all of the sensors that they offer they would get closer to actually correction factors. He said that it is closer to 10% rather than the 20%+ that most shops use. I personally HATE correction factors.

But in their, tobz, defense, if someone came to him with more mods compared to a friend and dynoed less than him. That person might not understand how CFs work and ask why his car is low on power. Not every person is smart enough to understand when they are being lied to. There are plenty of examples on here about this from former vendors. It's a shame.

Great job with the build Tobz and Mitch

just want to make it clear that the dyno is set up by Mustang and nothing was touched after. Mustang actually says to run the correction factor. i know alot of people are against this but its what mustang says to do. there are no sensors or anything that were left out, its exactly how mustang would want it to be set up. before people start to jump to conclusions, call mustang and they will explain all of this to you. also, you can always figure out uncorrected numbers.
Old Aug 10, 2010, 07:48 PM
  #30  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Evoryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ☼ Florida ☼
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
This car must fly.

dynojet > mustang...less drama


Quick Reply: 2.3+6262 at a Mile high!!!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:10 AM.