Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

forced fed performance 6262

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2010, 11:20 AM
  #31  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
ETS Michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 8,685
Received 54 Likes on 43 Posts
Looks like a fun car. Any pictures?
Old Aug 10, 2010, 12:01 PM
  #32  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
 
4doorstreetbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: with idiots
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ETS Michael
Looks like a fun car. Any pictures?

Thanks mike it is..Not at the moment but When I do ill pm to you!
Old Aug 10, 2010, 08:10 PM
  #33  
Evolving Member
 
drop24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada/Japan
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What fuel are you on?
Old Aug 10, 2010, 08:11 PM
  #34  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
 
4doorstreetbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: with idiots
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
93 oct
Old Aug 10, 2010, 08:26 PM
  #35  
Evolving Member
 
drop24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada/Japan
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Right on. You're really pushing the limits of the stock block but hopefully the lower torque numbers will help. What did your tuner say about the reliability of this build?
Old Aug 10, 2010, 08:43 PM
  #36  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
 
4doorstreetbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: with idiots
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by drop24
Right on. You're really pushing the limits of the stock block but hopefully the lower torque numbers will help. What did your tuner say about the reliability of this build?

THat's why we kept the tq low with a flat smooth ramp..Fine there are plenty of people running these power levels on the stock block tq plays a major role with keeping it together..people go crazy with tq but 400 wtq is the limit.
Old Aug 11, 2010, 05:31 AM
  #37  
Evolving Member
 
drop24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada/Japan
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I know, it seems like a great way to stick with the stock block will still making a large hp number. I'd like to copy this kind of setup for my car but we only have 91 here so I may have to turn to add meth to max out the stock block.

What did you pay for the turbo kit from Turbo Trix if you don't mind me asking? I don't see this kit on their website. I know ETS has a great price if you go with the 6262 and the value-manifold. I've seen people say they cracked it though.

How do think the 6262 compares to the HTA3582 and 86? I seem to see more people making bigger numbers on pump with the 6262 than the Garrets with simple setups. Maybe that's just because the cheaper 6262 attracts more people not interested in going all out with a built motor and exotic fuels.
Old Aug 11, 2010, 06:54 AM
  #38  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
 
4doorstreetbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: with idiots
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by drop24
I know, it seems like a great way to stick with the stock block will still making a large hp number. I'd like to copy this kind of setup for my car but we only have 91 here so I may have to turn to add meth to max out the stock block.

What did you pay for the turbo kit from Turbo Trix if you don't mind me asking? I don't see this kit on their website. I know ETS has a great price if you go with the 6262 and the value-manifold. I've seen people say they cracked it though.

How do think the 6262 compares to the HTA3582 and 86? I seem to see more people making bigger numbers on pump with the 6262 than the Garrets with simple setups. Maybe that's just because the cheaper 6262 attracts more people not interested in going all out with a built motor and exotic fuels.

I think I paid around 4,100 shipped for the kit complete the manifold they offer is very unique looking and the kit fits amazing.As far as comparing it to the other turbos the 6262 will make more top end and more whp maxed out but the hta 3586 is a great turbo too and spools about 200 rpms faster.But if you want a harder hitting turbo and a slower ramp up for the tq but peaks better the 6262 is your choice here are some pics of the kit..

-Equal-length stainless manifold made from sched. 10 bends. The manifold is Tig welded and properly back-purged.
-6262 dbb Turbo
-Oil and water lines
-Polished Lower IC pipe
-Stainless o2 housing
-Tial 44mm wastegate
-Stainless Dumptube
-3" downpipe
-Hi-flow Fan
Attached Thumbnails forced fed performance 6262-100e6593.jpg   forced fed performance 6262-100_6603.jpg   forced fed performance 6262-100_6608.jpg   forced fed performance 6262-100_6610.jpg   forced fed performance 6262-dscn3267.jpg  


Last edited by 4doorstreetbike; Aug 11, 2010 at 06:59 AM.
Old Aug 11, 2010, 09:47 AM
  #39  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
kimma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pensacola,FL
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow just wow
Old Aug 11, 2010, 11:06 AM
  #40  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
 
4doorstreetbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: with idiots
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kimma
wow just wow
Looks like its time for you to sell the sti and get a evolution.

Last edited by 4doorstreetbike; Aug 11, 2010 at 11:11 AM.
Old Aug 11, 2010, 01:12 PM
  #41  
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (24)
 
Noize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 8,849
Received 135 Likes on 81 Posts
Off topic junk removed. This is a dyno results thread for a Forced-Fed tuned 6262. Please keep thread on topic.
Old Aug 19, 2010, 12:43 PM
  #42  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
crewdawg130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fayetteville, NC via Puerto Rico
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kasey
From what I have seen I agree. I dont think you could find a better place to take your car in Eastern NC! Nice job Bobi!! That is some nice power!


Originally Posted by Noize
Off topic junk removed. This is a dyno results thread for a Forced-Fed tuned 6262. Please keep thread on topic.
thank you
Old Aug 19, 2010, 12:47 PM
  #43  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (46)
 
Force-Fed Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Raleigh, Fayetteville NC
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kasey
From what I have seen I agree. I dont think you could find a better place to take your car in Eastern NC! Nice job Bobi!! That is some nice power!

Thanks kasey. We appreciate the comments and cant wait to shoot the **** with you again man.
Old Aug 24, 2010, 02:02 AM
  #44  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
jasnm21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Abq, NM
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 4doorstreetbike
I think I paid around 4,100 shipped for the kit complete the manifold they offer is very unique looking and the kit fits amazing.As far as comparing it to the other turbos the 6262 will make more top end and more whp maxed out but the hta 3586 is a great turbo too and spools about 200 rpms faster.But if you want a harder hitting turbo and a slower ramp up for the tq but peaks better the 6262 is your choice here are some pics of the kit..

-Equal-length stainless manifold made from sched. 10 bends. The manifold is Tig welded and properly back-purged.
-6262 dbb Turbo
-Oil and water lines
-Polished Lower IC pipe
-Stainless o2 housing
-Tial 44mm wastegate
-Stainless Dumptube
-3" downpipe
-Hi-flow Fan
Are you sure about this? I know that I have read on numerous occasions that the 86 flows more and will make more over all power. I hate when people misinform other people.

Here at the flow rates
HTA3582 is a 59mm inducer. 70lb/min w/ a 61mm turbine wheel.
6262 is 62mm inducer. flows 72lb/min, and has a 62mm turbine wheel.
HTA3586 flows 75lb/min. This is what it says on their site. This 62mm inlet / 86mm exducer HTA™ wheel extends mass flow well beyond 75 lb/min with observed power output...

Forced Performance always under rates their turbos.

If you doubt these numbers, ask mike at AWD which one makes more power and spools faster....

Last edited by jasnm21; Aug 24, 2010 at 02:06 AM.
Old Aug 24, 2010, 06:49 AM
  #45  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
 
4doorstreetbike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: with idiots
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jasnm21
Are you sure about this? I know that I have read on numerous occasions that the 86 flows more and will make more over all power. I hate when people misinform other people.

Here at the flow rates
HTA3582 is a 59mm inducer. 70lb/min w/ a 61mm turbine wheel.
6262 is 62mm inducer. flows 72lb/min, and has a 62mm turbine wheel.
HTA3586 flows 75lb/min. This is what it says on their site. This 62mm inlet / 86mm exducer HTA™ wheel extends mass flow well beyond 75 lb/min with observed power output...

Forced Performance always under rates their turbos.

If you doubt these numbers, ask mike at AWD which one makes more power and spools faster....

The 6262 flows 76Lb per min the 6262 and the 3586 are like twins very similar..The 6262 makes more power at the end of the day how come mike used it to go 9's instead of the 86??


Quick Reply: forced fed performance 6262



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:47 AM.