FiD: Evo 8/9 GT30R Turbo Kit Comparison
#1
FiD: Evo 8/9 GT30R Turbo Kit Comparison
We recently upgraded a local customers car from an ETS supevalue tubular manifold setup to the FiD EL v-band manifold. Both manifolds were running a GT3076R .63 A/R. turbo with the same intercooler piping wanted to post some test result between our v-band EL tubular manifold and v-band downpipe setup.
Vehicle Specs:
Evo 8 GSR
Stock longblock
Comp 272/272 cams
750cc injectors
Walbro 255HP
3" turboback
reflash ecu
3" Intake
Red Graph: FiD w/GT3076R TIAL v-band turbine housing .63 A/R
Blue Graph: ETS supevalue tubular t3 housing .63 A/R
With the tune unchanged except for lowering the boost, the car made more hp/tq and spooled quicker running ~3psi less boost with the FiD setup.
Here's the FiD GT30R setup at 23.5 psi on 93 octane
MrC
Vehicle Specs:
Evo 8 GSR
Stock longblock
Comp 272/272 cams
750cc injectors
Walbro 255HP
3" turboback
reflash ecu
3" Intake
Red Graph: FiD w/GT3076R TIAL v-band turbine housing .63 A/R
Blue Graph: ETS supevalue tubular t3 housing .63 A/R
With the tune unchanged except for lowering the boost, the car made more hp/tq and spooled quicker running ~3psi less boost with the FiD setup.
Here's the FiD GT30R setup at 23.5 psi on 93 octane
MrC
Last edited by FiD-Turbo.com; Aug 12, 2010 at 02:34 PM.
#2
I"m really surprised people are still using the 30 r is still a great lil turbo..Nice test with the manifold's also I guess you pay for What you get. what was the correction factor??Also why such low boost??
#3
MrC
#4
#6
Trending Topics
#14
Really can't see the value of money to HP ratio on a setup like this? Why not just go with a red for better spool and similiar power. I know this thread isn't for that discussion but why did the owner go for this setup?
#15
Just to throw it out there - but that's my car now. Well now it is anyways, as I bought it from AJ. I can attest that is is a _very_ well built kit, and my friend fabricates kits for mustangs and domestics for a living, so I have seen a few.
That 429hp run was _VERY_ conservatively tuned. 10 degrees of timing advance at full boost and mid 10's AFR.
Here is the sheet from AWD after I had it re-tuned.
Blue line was 25psi with the ptuning tune. Red was 28psi with Diiirk tune. At the same 25psi it made ~420hp just with the new tune.
I believe the original owner had it setup for HPDE and autocross.
-Jason
That 429hp run was _VERY_ conservatively tuned. 10 degrees of timing advance at full boost and mid 10's AFR.
Here is the sheet from AWD after I had it re-tuned.
Blue line was 25psi with the ptuning tune. Red was 28psi with Diiirk tune. At the same 25psi it made ~420hp just with the new tune.
Really can't see the value of money to HP ratio on a setup like this? Why not just go with a red for better spool and similiar power. I know this thread isn't for that discussion but why did the owner go for this setup?
-Jason