Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

FP Black, 27 PSI, 93 oct, Stock Block

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 07:16 PM
  #16  
5LEEPERISAH23I's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Malvern, PA
Originally Posted by mchristian
I have almost the exact same mods...installing FP Black this week and was expecting closer to 450-475 whp....on 93 pump and at lower boost?

I'd certainly be happy with 11.91 @ 119.79 with a 2.01 60ft!
yea i was at the track with that trap i should be 11.3-11.6 if i could drive
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 07:22 PM
  #17  
zeus1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: manchester, new hampshire
if you get the log of that run give it a try in this virtual dyno too.
http://www.mellontuning.com/index.ph...4c024c1a0bc851
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 07:30 PM
  #18  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: pa
Originally Posted by zeus1
if you get the log of that run give it a try in this virtual dyno too.
http://www.mellontuning.com/index.ph...4c024c1a0bc851
i agree.. use that prog its great. the idea is to get as little smoothing as possible. you want to set the smoothing so its barely using it, but at the same time your graph looks within reason.. its nice power for 27psi regardless.
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 08:47 PM
  #19  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Since you are obviously a BR person, why not do a BR IM, BR ported TB and switch over to SD? I love your setup by the way.
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 08:51 PM
  #20  
sparky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
You list a catback exhaust in your modlist. Does this mean that you are running through a catalytic convertor still?
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 08:54 PM
  #21  
5LEEPERISAH23I's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Malvern, PA
Originally Posted by tscompusa
i agree.. use that prog its great. the idea is to get as little smoothing as possible. you want to set the smoothing so its barely using it, but at the same time your graph looks within reason.. its nice power for 27psi regardless.
i looks smooth with the smoothing factor set at 3.. it reads 435whp 362wtq
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #22  
5LEEPERISAH23I's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Malvern, PA
Originally Posted by sparky
Since you are obviously a BR person, why not do a BR IM, BR ported TB and switch over to SD? I love your setup by the way.
yea havnt touched any of thoeses parts yett but when i do u bet i will do BR parts..

and i am running no cat in my car
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 05:39 AM
  #23  
zeus1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: manchester, new hampshire
is your car lightened up because the weight should be higher unless 03's were lighter. i found most use 3260 for weight or there about for non rs models. this will bump your figures up.
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 06:57 AM
  #24  
4doorstreetbike's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: with idiots
I had the black and was never a fan of these stock framed turbos..But I see people are happy with them and there running some pretty decent times with them and they make some nice street power..

The only thing I don't like about them is they fall of of power and that there journal bearing wheels and when pushed at high boost levels they tend to fail quit easy..

If you get your 60 ft to a 1.6 you should run 11.2 ALL DAY.I can't believe you sold your old hts 35 r setup for the black I wish you would have tried the t3 setup first maybe now your eyebrows would have been peeled of by now.
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 08:49 AM
  #25  
5LEEPERISAH23I's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Malvern, PA
Originally Posted by zeus1
is your car lightened up because the weight should be higher unless 03's were lighter. i found most use 3260 for weight or there about for non rs models. this will bump your figures up.
I just picked a low number so people don't complain saying that is how I made my numbers
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 08:52 AM
  #26  
5LEEPERISAH23I's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Malvern, PA
Originally Posted by 4doorstreetbike
I had the black and was never a fan of these stock framed turbos..But I see people are happy with them and there running some pretty decent times with them and they make some nice street power..

The only thing I don't like about them is they fall of of power and that there journal bearing wheels and when pushed at high boost levels they tend to fail quit easy..

If you get your 60 ft to a 1.6 you should run 11.2 ALL DAY.I can't believe you sold your old hts 35 r setup for the black I wish you would have tried the t3 setup first maybe now your eyebrows would have been peeled of by now.
Yea I blew up tranfer case n had to let that turbo go. I how rather have an hta 35r but could find a good deal on one when it came around to getting another turbo
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 09:02 AM
  #27  
FraziersEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale,Fl.
Nice numbers,are you not 2 stepping at the track?
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 10:57 AM
  #28  
5LEEPERISAH23I's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Malvern, PA
Originally Posted by FraziersEVO
Nice numbers,are you not 2 stepping at the track?
I was just bogged horribly
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 11:02 AM
  #29  
zeus1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: manchester, new hampshire
Originally Posted by 5LEEPERISAH23I
I just picked a low number so people don't complain saying that is how I made my numbers
gotcha, that weight is legit though dont think you would see much resitance on that one
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 11:20 AM
  #30  
4doorstreetbike's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: with idiots
Originally Posted by 5LEEPERISAH23I
I was just bogged horribly

Not bad .not bad at all brother..I'm gonna lower my launch map cause I'm coming out a little to hard I'm lanching at 16psi at 6,400 and it feels nuts ..what's your 2 step and boost set at for launching?

Last edited by 4doorstreetbike; Aug 18, 2010 at 11:42 AM.


Quick Reply: FP Black, 27 PSI, 93 oct, Stock Block



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:14 PM.