Insane Speed 2.2L on 6265....815awhp + 791awtq
May 10, 2011, 03:07 PM
#31
Evolved Member
May 10, 2011, 03:17 PM
#33
Newbie
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
May 10, 2011, 04:53 PM
#37
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: las vegas
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mikey
by the extensive mod list.
May 10, 2011, 07:40 PM
#39
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: las vegas
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
May 10, 2011, 08:03 PM
#40
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey guys 1st congrats on the clean build. Please don’t take offence to all including myself that are skeptical about the numbers.
I ran the post and graph by my builder(Dogboxracing) to ask them there take. Considering they are one of if not the highest HP Evo’s built 170+traps on low boost( 40psi). I listen when they talk.
They believe the graph and numbers and said it is impressive. It can be done with moving cam timing/ overlap into left field. This can make early peak numbers but they drop like a rock. Overall they are guessing the car will have a hard time breaking 160+ traps. Due to the power drop and small power band. It looks great on paper but not the best on the blacktop.
I am not trying to start a war but my interests are in cam design and valve timing as I am trying to get the most out of a street setup. Does this make any sense to you guys?
I ran the post and graph by my builder(Dogboxracing) to ask them there take. Considering they are one of if not the highest HP Evo’s built 170+traps on low boost( 40psi). I listen when they talk.
They believe the graph and numbers and said it is impressive. It can be done with moving cam timing/ overlap into left field. This can make early peak numbers but they drop like a rock. Overall they are guessing the car will have a hard time breaking 160+ traps. Due to the power drop and small power band. It looks great on paper but not the best on the blacktop.
I am not trying to start a war but my interests are in cam design and valve timing as I am trying to get the most out of a street setup. Does this make any sense to you guys?
Last edited by jezefink; May 11, 2011 at 05:43 AM.
May 10, 2011, 08:08 PM
#41
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Btw- Is there a vid of the dyno pulls?
I would love to hear it. Should sound like monster. Hearing a 4g63 making 900+ on a mustang dyno sounds insane. From what I was told it takes just over 1sec to pull from 6.5-10k in that power range.
I would love to hear it. Should sound like monster. Hearing a 4g63 making 900+ on a mustang dyno sounds insane. From what I was told it takes just over 1sec to pull from 6.5-10k in that power range.
May 10, 2011, 10:27 PM
#43
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
May 10, 2011, 10:35 PM
#45
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey guys 1st congrats on the clean build. Please don’t take offence to all including myself that are skeptical about the numbers.
I ran the post and graph by my builder(Dogboxracing) to ask them there take. Considering they are one of if not the highest HP Evo’s built 170+traps on low boost( 40psi). I listen when they talk.
They believe the graph and numbers and said it is impressive. It can be done with moving cam timing/ overlap into left field. This can make a early peak numbers but they drop like rocks. Overall they are guessing the car will have a hard time breaking 160+ traps. Due to the power drop and small power band. It looks great on paper but not the best on the blacktop.
I am not trying to start a war but my interested are in cam design and valve timing as I am trying to get the most out of a street setup. Does this make any sense to you guys?
I ran the post and graph by my builder(Dogboxracing) to ask them there take. Considering they are one of if not the highest HP Evo’s built 170+traps on low boost( 40psi). I listen when they talk.
They believe the graph and numbers and said it is impressive. It can be done with moving cam timing/ overlap into left field. This can make a early peak numbers but they drop like rocks. Overall they are guessing the car will have a hard time breaking 160+ traps. Due to the power drop and small power band. It looks great on paper but not the best on the blacktop.
I am not trying to start a war but my interested are in cam design and valve timing as I am trying to get the most out of a street setup. Does this make any sense to you guys?
I wouldn't argue at all with any of what you said except the power band being small, as we make over 650awhp from 4800-8800rpm. Cam timing is certainly a big part of making the big torque number. This car was really meant to be a street car with ridiculous mid range and big torque. If we wanted an all out drag set up, it would make more sense to alter cam timing and go with a larger turbo. That, I don't disagree with at all. It was built to be a street killer, and I think they are absolutely right about a high 150's trap speed and having a rough time breaking 160 in it's current configuration.
As for the aluminum rods that someone else asked about. We already street tested the rods for over 20,000 street miles on a different Evo without any adverse issues. Everything was completely in order of what was hoped for after opening up the engine, tearing it down, and measuring everything. After our own personal R&D and discussing the set up with GRP, we feel confident in the rods for street use.