JMFabrication O2 dump results
#17
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Big city, Bright lights
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
10 Posts
holy hell.
now my question is will the gains be remotely close just using something like MAP's recirculated eliminator downpipe? i really wanna keep my car a little quiter.
now my question is will the gains be remotely close just using something like MAP's recirculated eliminator downpipe? i really wanna keep my car a little quiter.
#18
This is the second closest test which was Mikey's vs JohnnyTSI but it was not conclusive since Johnny had a stock head and OTS S2s where Mikey had a Bushmaster Race Port and the ER2 cams I have in my car that Greg came up with for testing.
We just sold an MAP O2 dump (38mm MVS) to Johnny so we can see a closer test all on the same car. He also has S3s and a Race Port in the car now so again its closer to Mikey's but even then still not exact.
Aaron
We just sold an MAP O2 dump (38mm MVS) to Johnny so we can see a closer test all on the same car. He also has S3s and a Race Port in the car now so again its closer to Mikey's but even then still not exact.
Aaron
#20
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
so RoninVIIIRS said ets 3.5" can you confirm thats the exhaust system on this car Aaron? i know the dumps make huge differences ever since my dsm days, i just dont like drawling that much attention when going WOT... but when you see the comparison on the dyno graph you have to wonder if you're nuts for just sacrificing all that additional power for alittle additional noise out of what is supposed to be a performance machine anyways.
was the AFR curve kept the same? if not that can account for some of it downlow.
was the AFR curve kept the same? if not that can account for some of it downlow.
#21
It looked like the 3.5" exhaust to me yes. Keith can chime in on that. The other car does have a 3.5" exhaust as well. AFR was the same down low but I believe the other test may have had colder ambient temps which helps, but the main thing is the start RPM was not exact so it always skews the early results some.
aaron
aaron
#26
But identical mods. I have already done back to back testing on individual cars but always smaller turbos (.i.e. TurboJunkie). I know there are substantial gains but this was #1 ridiculous power at low boost for the combo, and a good chance to compare 2 cars a few days apart. I will be retesting Johnny's car when it gets the 38mm dump on it.
Aaron
Aaron
#28
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Philly, Jersey
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But two different cars two different days is a bit much.. Either way the difference is quite large..Mabye I will give it a shot on my own car and get some same car same day results.. Thanks again to ER for sharing the data. JMF makes killer products and I use/reccomend them whenever I can!
#29
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Philly, Jersey
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But identical mods. I have already done back to back testing on individual cars but always smaller turbos (.i.e. TurboJunkie). I know there are substantial gains but this was #1 ridiculous power at low boost for the combo, and a good chance to compare 2 cars a few days apart. I will be retesting Johnny's car when it gets the 38mm dump on it.
Aaron
Aaron
#30
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pah, WA
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so RoninVIIIRS said ets 3.5" can you confirm thats the exhaust system on this car Aaron? i know the dumps make huge differences ever since my dsm days, i just dont like drawling that much attention when going WOT... but when you see the comparison on the dyno graph you have to wonder if you're nuts for just sacrificing all that additional power for alittle additional noise out of what is supposed to be a performance machine anyways.
was the AFR curve kept the same? if not that can account for some of it downlow.
was the AFR curve kept the same? if not that can account for some of it downlow.