HTA3794r switch... preliminary results inside
Aug 26, 2011, 01:07 PM
#31
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well, between all the evos here at my friend's shop there are 3 HTA86 evos built and they were/are awesome on the street/track. From my experience, the lag difference is very minimal. HTA86 actually lags for a 35r compared to an HTA82 or 6262. Add a few hundred rpm worth of lag and you get the HTA94. But you have to consider you also get maybe an extra 1krpm or more of useable power up top where the HTA86 starts to fall off. I like the compromise myself. You get the same top end power of a 70mm turbo but w/ better response.
Aug 26, 2011, 01:19 PM
#33
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: houston
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im back to running my HKS EVC. Its limited to 250kpa / 36psi
Anything higher and it thinks its overboosting and shuts it down to wastegate, lol.
My previous turbos i was running a Hallman MBC, which is still in the engine bay actually... but i'll only use it at the dyno. My front facing turbo makes the boost go up alot at high mph. I remember last time it hit 39psi in 3rd and when i shifted into 4th gear my logs said it hit 46psi! But it wont do it stationary (eg. on a dyno) Anyways, i lifted the head a few passes after that so I kinda wanted a lil' more control (for now at least) So im going conservative.
I can always turn up the wick later... im in no rush. I've hit over 800whp on a mustang dyno before. It was a lot of headache keeping it together, not in a real hurry to get back to all that again
It was basically a dyno queenA true 700-750 is plenty to get the job done.
Aug 27, 2011, 01:17 PM
#34
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For those asking about the comparison of the 3586 to the 3794. I have had both, loved both!
There is about a 500 rpm spool diffrence, but WELL over 100+ MUSTANG whp difference!
As far as street driving goes.... I had more traction issues with the 3586 over the 3794, 3586 is a SUPER awesome fun street turbo, the 3794 isnt quite as fun to drive around, but you beat a lot faster cars with it, so.....LOL. I ran both turbos @ 40psi to redline. Car is a 2.0
There is about a 500 rpm spool diffrence, but WELL over 100+ MUSTANG whp difference!
As far as street driving goes.... I had more traction issues with the 3586 over the 3794, 3586 is a SUPER awesome fun street turbo, the 3794 isnt quite as fun to drive around, but you beat a lot faster cars with it, so.....LOL. I ran both turbos @ 40psi to redline. Car is a 2.0
Aug 27, 2011, 03:32 PM
#35
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For those asking about the comparison of the 3586 to the 3794. I have had both, loved both!
There is about a 500 rpm spool diffrence, but WELL over 100+ MUSTANG whp difference!
As far as street driving goes.... I had more traction issues with the 3586 over the 3794, 3586 is a SUPER awesome fun street turbo, the 3794 isnt quite as fun to drive around, but you beat a lot faster cars with it, so.....LOL. I ran both turbos @ 40psi to redline. Car is a 2.0
There is about a 500 rpm spool diffrence, but WELL over 100+ MUSTANG whp difference!
As far as street driving goes.... I had more traction issues with the 3586 over the 3794, 3586 is a SUPER awesome fun street turbo, the 3794 isnt quite as fun to drive around, but you beat a lot faster cars with it, so.....LOL. I ran both turbos @ 40psi to redline. Car is a 2.0
Aug 28, 2011, 12:06 PM
#36
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldnt always say that.... there is a time that comes with the turbo is simply just too big. It's all about usuable power... the usuable power is a little less, but luckily you never fall out of the power, so it works... I cant stand graphs that are raising the whole time, My graph is at the top at 5800-6000 and stays there til it's time to shift. This turbo is probably the largest turbo that will be on my car(unless someone comes out with an auto for the evo...hint hint, wink wink, nudge nudge), now time to better other things and see where it's at
Last edited by Weezy03; Aug 28, 2011 at 12:09 PM.
Aug 28, 2011, 03:35 PM
#38
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Albany NY
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For those asking about the comparison of the 3586 to the 3794. I have had both, loved both!
There is about a 500 rpm spool diffrence, but WELL over 100+ MUSTANG whp difference!
As far as street driving goes.... I had more traction issues with the 3586 over the 3794, 3586 is a SUPER awesome fun street turbo, the 3794 isnt quite as fun to drive around, but you beat a lot faster cars with it, so.....LOL. I ran both turbos @ 40psi to redline. Car is a 2.0
There is about a 500 rpm spool diffrence, but WELL over 100+ MUSTANG whp difference!
As far as street driving goes.... I had more traction issues with the 3586 over the 3794, 3586 is a SUPER awesome fun street turbo, the 3794 isnt quite as fun to drive around, but you beat a lot faster cars with it, so.....LOL. I ran both turbos @ 40psi to redline. Car is a 2.0
i'm still debating an hta86 or an fp black!
Aug 28, 2011, 06:52 PM
#39
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ya that was against the 3794. If you can, go 86!!
PS how did you know about those vids? ha- PM me
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
David Buschur
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
206
Sep 6, 2015 09:27 PM
High_PSI
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
19
May 6, 2015 06:18 AM
detroit pistins
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
18
Jan 22, 2014 11:37 AM
awdordie
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
18
May 6, 2012 07:48 AM
AutoMotoSports
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
160
Jan 26, 2009 02:47 PM
