Spec-Ops Tuned- Justins Evo VIII with IX turbo E85 & ER SD Programming
Dec 14, 2011, 09:43 AM
#46
V7 has no features that I need the way I have the load to MAP setup. 200 is 20psi, 300 is 30psi, the ECU does boost comp anyway so all I need is to keep the breakpoints where the car works. If its an E85 car that works up to 35psi, the last column I use is 375. If its gas and 28psi the last column I really need is 300-310. Everything is unique to the customer and his needs.
The V5 I am using is not off the shelf either, it was the last big change David did before V7 and as far as I know I am the only one that has the specific code. Visually it looks like V5.0 to V5.10 but its not exactly the same.
Aaron
Dec 14, 2011, 10:55 AM
#47
i worded what i said wrong, i didnt think before i said it.. its just a older style/ version rom.. nothing wrong with that.
the smaller maps work, no question about that
. i have no bad bugs though with bigger maps on 9653 9417 and 8859 which pretty much covers all american evos. (03-07)
i cant say the same for the edm roms though. and i will agree newer isn't always better in a lot of cases in life. at the end of the day they both get the job done and that's all that matters.
just bad choice of words on my behalf.. because its not really a downgrade.. more like just another option to use.. one isn't lesser then the other per say when it comes to the overall capabilities of them. i didn't mean it in a bad way.. i just used the wrong kind of words at the time. my apologies.
the smaller maps work, no question about that
. i have no bad bugs though with bigger maps on 9653 9417 and 8859 which pretty much covers all american evos. (03-07)i cant say the same for the edm roms though. and i will agree newer isn't always better in a lot of cases in life. at the end of the day they both get the job done and that's all that matters.
just bad choice of words on my behalf.. because its not really a downgrade.. more like just another option to use.. one isn't lesser then the other per say when it comes to the overall capabilities of them. i didn't mean it in a bad way.. i just used the wrong kind of words at the time. my apologies.
Dec 14, 2011, 03:20 PM
#49
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some of it is that, however there are other things he does different as well Tom... whatever he does it obviously works... ER has thousands of satisfied customers, and some of the fastest street cars you never hear about... You don't have to utilize big maps every single tune to get great results, sometimes it is overkill... but thanks for your opinion...
Haha.
Your ignorance and arrogance are astounding. Aaron has figured out soo many more memory addresses than what comes standard with the Ecuflash software. I'd venture to say that he's found more calibratable tables, maps, and parameters than you're actually using Tom.
Of course you can't see that because you're don't have these tables defined... because you haven't spent the last few years working on this.
Your ignorance and arrogance are astounding. Aaron has figured out soo many more memory addresses than what comes standard with the Ecuflash software. I'd venture to say that he's found more calibratable tables, maps, and parameters than you're actually using Tom.
Of course you can't see that because you're don't have these tables defined... because you haven't spent the last few years working on this.
I completely disagree that its a downgrade. The bigger maps and V7 have issues as well that I refuse to deal with since they arent perfect.
V7 has no features that I need the way I have the load to MAP setup. 200 is 20psi, 300 is 30psi, the ECU does boost comp anyway so all I need is to keep the breakpoints where the car works. If its an E85 car that works up to 35psi, the last column I use is 375. If its gas and 28psi the last column I really need is 300-310. Everything is unique to the customer and his needs.
The V5 I am using is not off the shelf either, it was the last big change David did before V7 and as far as I know I am the only one that has the specific code. Visually it looks like V5.0 to V5.10 but its not exactly the same.
Aaron
V7 has no features that I need the way I have the load to MAP setup. 200 is 20psi, 300 is 30psi, the ECU does boost comp anyway so all I need is to keep the breakpoints where the car works. If its an E85 car that works up to 35psi, the last column I use is 375. If its gas and 28psi the last column I really need is 300-310. Everything is unique to the customer and his needs.
The V5 I am using is not off the shelf either, it was the last big change David did before V7 and as far as I know I am the only one that has the specific code. Visually it looks like V5.0 to V5.10 but its not exactly the same.
Aaron
Dec 14, 2011, 03:50 PM
#50
HTA94 2.4 numbers- 831/630 @ 39.5psi E85/STOCK ECU
Or
Mikey@Spec ops DBB FP Black 2.4L that makes over 700WHP on E85....
Please start a new thread if you want to talk about items not related to my car.
Thanks!
Last edited by goad_white03; Dec 14, 2011 at 03:56 PM.
Dec 14, 2011, 03:53 PM
#51
i appreciate you sticking up for me Travis, but please i don't want to get into this in Fred's thread. i know why you said that though.. because you're using v7 SD.. either way lets drop it. i know what works and what doesn't.. end of discussion. i stand by what i said above.. the roms all do the same thing at the end of the day. 
make evos fast!
i stand by what i said above.. the roms all do the same thing at the end of the day. make evos fast!
Dec 14, 2011, 04:12 PM
#52
My car made 794 at 38psi on a 3586 on the kill tune in the middle of July uncorrected. I make 831/630 at 39.5 on my easy tune now with the 3794 but thats not what you asked. My car is not a "shop" car though. I paid for and install all my parts as well as tune it. It has been driven 15,000 miles on the street and raced somehow everyday. What I learned from tuning the 3794 (making pulls in 4th gear instead of 3rd) leads me to believe that my 3586 was actually well over 800 had it been dyno'd with sufficient load like I do the 3794 (and anything over 650whp) now.
Mikey made 748 on a Black and is still the highest stock appearing turbo car in the world (though it has been debated because of his turbine housing). It was built and tuned here based on what I had already learned from my car. The specific parts, cams, headwork, tuning, etc.
Big Jesse made 730whp in his 2.0L Evo 8 on off the shelf S2s and a 3586. Knowing what we know now, I think switching the VIII version of the 12 gauge cams I have in my car it should do the same as mine or more. He has already ran 142mph in a 3550 lb car on real street tires (245/45-17 goodyear F1).
Tom,
Apology accepted though probably wasnt needed
. We all phrase things incorrectly sometimes, I am no different than anyone else and have done it many times.
Last edited by JohnBradley; Dec 14, 2011 at 04:50 PM.
Dec 14, 2011, 04:27 PM
#53
I know of English Racing, they have an enviable reputation & help out peeps here all the the time. If you chat with Aaron tell him I'm sorry for his traumatised upbringing, I used to be a drill sergeant for 3yrs myself, we are a little over the top lol
.
Good luck at Spec Ops
in 2012. Have a great Xmas lads!
.Good luck at Spec Ops
in 2012. Have a great Xmas lads! 
I was spoiled for the most part but I had to face a DI if I fouled up and got treated like it was me first week in boot. On the upside I could do more pushups than anyone else in school
Last edited by JohnBradley; Dec 14, 2011 at 04:30 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Spec-OpsMotorsports
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
171
Aug 13, 2015 09:53 AM
Mikey@Spec-Ops
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
92
Dec 12, 2011 09:47 PM
