FILIN

8.8 sec I run 2 years ago with 100mm crank. This year I use 94mm crank. I could run 9.3 sec with 93RON and 8.9 with Q16 and big problem with launch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV28Y...&feature=feedu

The power in HP.

L@Ncer06

iTrader: (4)

awesome power the car is really moving out

AlphaKennyBody

iTrader: (2)

Any reason why when you went to a 94MM Crank vs the 100?

R/TErnie

iTrader: (32)

let me count the ways.

That's 1023 DJ whp according to my calcs.

If you figure how to get out of the hole... incredible times! Your car moooves.

MJ23FE

iTrader: (3)

Nice power.

You just need to match up the scaling on the hp and tq on the Y axis. Make both max and min numbers for HP and TQ the same.

-Jalal

FILIN

I wanted more power at high RPM, improve trap speed, but I lost torque at the middle range. My launch became unstable and engine's life is much shorter than with 100mm crank. Next year I will bit my 100mm crank time and the aim is about 8.5 sec))). Now I got good torque curve and hope to get success. It was too difficult)))