Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

EVO7 GT45R Q16 Ukraine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2011, 08:09 AM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
FILIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ukraine, Kiev
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EVO7 GT45R Q16 Ukraine

A few days ago I tuned my drag EVO7. Mustang dyno.

3 bar pull:


3.2 bar:


Some video in bad quality:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvvG2lw7AM8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6liKk9r2ILw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHc9cVOa1Rc

The car is used only for drag.

4G64 block
custom head porting
custom header with GT45R in compact housings
custom intake with Q45TB
own dry sump system instead of AMS crap
Vi-pec V88 ECU with M&W drag pro CDI
Old Nov 12, 2011, 11:55 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
project_skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What the hell? Why did you setup the graph like that?

Tq and hp should intersect at 5250 rpm. 700 TQ on a MD on a 2.1 or whatever you using seems a lot for a GT45R. That doesn't seem right at all.
Old Nov 12, 2011, 12:06 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
S13 Curtis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Orlando,FL
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by project_skyline
What the hell? Why did you setup the graph like that?

Tq and hp should intersect at 5250 rpm. 700 TQ on a MD on a 2.1 or whatever you using seems a lot for a GT45R. That doesn't seem right at all.
I was thinking the same. But either way it put down good numbers.
Old Nov 12, 2011, 12:40 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
evosam726's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yeah talk about 700 tq! wtf. but good numbers sounds great! hope my car sounds like that lol one day
Old Nov 12, 2011, 03:10 PM
  #5  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
FILIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ukraine, Kiev
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by project_skyline
What the hell? Why did you setup the graph like that?

Tq and hp should intersect at 5250 rpm. 700 TQ on a MD on a 2.1 or whatever you using seems a lot for a GT45R. That doesn't seem right at all.
I think its because we ( in Europe) use metric system instead of your. My TQ is measured in Nm and you use ft-lbs.
Old Nov 12, 2011, 03:13 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Blue91lx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I wonder what it would spool at if you started the pull a bit earlier.
Old Nov 12, 2011, 03:24 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
FILIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ukraine, Kiev
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think, we would not have any changes. I forgot to mention that dyno Load was 95%)))
Old Nov 12, 2011, 03:32 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
EVO(boss)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: KSA
Posts: 570
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Wow that a good numbers ,,, did you rev the engine to 10000rpm ? Or what
Old Nov 12, 2011, 05:48 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
awdturbo8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rochester,NY
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sickkk numbers. 700tq!!!
Old Nov 13, 2011, 10:43 AM
  #10  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
FILIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ukraine, Kiev
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVO(boss)
Wow that a good numbers ,,, did you rev the engine to 10000rpm ? Or what
Only during the run at 1 gear. The power does not rise. After 9500 it slow goes down.
Old Nov 13, 2011, 05:57 PM
  #11  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
akauf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Holland, Pa
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its 520lb/ft of torque. It might not be imperial hp either but they're close to the same anyhow.

Either way 8.8 @ 163mph is no joke! Congrats!
Old Nov 13, 2011, 07:41 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
project_skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by FILIN
I think its because we ( in Europe) use metric system instead of your. My TQ is measured in Nm and you use ft-lbs.
Oh ok. Interesting, is that power in kilowatts?
Old Nov 13, 2011, 08:10 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
 
MrLith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Welly NZ
Posts: 715
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
I was thinking that 888whp on nearly 50psi on Q16 with a motor like this might be a bit light, if thats kw - WOW.... very very nice work. That's going to haul!!! I'm guessing this could be the car that did high 8s in the video versus a certain Ukraine Skyline, possibly runs an STM Ghost shifter?
Old Nov 13, 2011, 09:12 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
n2oiroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: milwaukee, wi
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
so is it a 4g64 block with a 100mm crank?
Old Nov 13, 2011, 10:58 PM
  #15  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
akauf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Holland, Pa
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well looking at the second graph...

707nm * .7376 = 521.4832 FT-LB

hp=(ft-lb*rpm)/5252

(521.4832x9141)/5252= 907.63

so that's hp as we know it fwiw


Quick Reply: EVO7 GT45R Q16 Ukraine



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:30 PM.