ATP GTX 3071 2.0 stock block
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ATP GTX 3071 2.0 stock block
Hi all..
this is mine result with this configuration:
gtx 3071 on stock location
stock block
tomei 272 cams
26psi boost
I think this turbo can be able of 520-530hp with 34 psi of boost, so like the older gt3076 not "X" with our experience... but the spool is not so good, maybe my other car with 2.3 stroker and gt35r on T3 flange spool more faster (if i can i post that dyne on monday).
By enniorancati at 2011-12-03
P.s. The Hp is flywhell hp and the torque is in Kgm, of course the boost is barometric but at 1.7bar it's like your's 26psi ;-)
this is mine result with this configuration:
gtx 3071 on stock location
stock block
tomei 272 cams
26psi boost
I think this turbo can be able of 520-530hp with 34 psi of boost, so like the older gt3076 not "X" with our experience... but the spool is not so good, maybe my other car with 2.3 stroker and gt35r on T3 flange spool more faster (if i can i post that dyne on monday).
By enniorancati at 2011-12-03
P.s. The Hp is flywhell hp and the torque is in Kgm, of course the boost is barometric but at 1.7bar it's like your's 26psi ;-)
#2
Evolving Member
Thanks for posting this info. The GTX3071 with T3 4-bolt 2.5 inch outlet turbine housing is one way I might go with my car.
Can you tell me how they came up with flywheel horsepower? Basically, if they did this with your car on a chassis dyno, they would be measuring wheel horsepower, then using some assumed conversion factor to convert the wheel hp to flywheel hp, right? If that's what they did, could you find out what the conversion factor is that they used? Then I can get back to wheel hp with it.
Thanks
Can you tell me how they came up with flywheel horsepower? Basically, if they did this with your car on a chassis dyno, they would be measuring wheel horsepower, then using some assumed conversion factor to convert the wheel hp to flywheel hp, right? If that's what they did, could you find out what the conversion factor is that they used? Then I can get back to wheel hp with it.
Thanks
#4
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got much better result from this turbo, have a look here https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/9665739-post31.html
In my opinion you have some problem with camshaft settings.
In my opinion you have some problem with camshaft settings.
#6
Thanks for posting this info. The GTX3071 with T3 4-bolt 2.5 inch outlet turbine housing is one way I might go with my car.
Can you tell me how they came up with flywheel horsepower? Basically, if they did this with your car on a chassis dyno, they would be measuring wheel horsepower, then using some assumed conversion factor to convert the wheel hp to flywheel hp, right? If that's what they did, could you find out what the conversion factor is that they used? Then I can get back to wheel hp with it.
Thanks
Can you tell me how they came up with flywheel horsepower? Basically, if they did this with your car on a chassis dyno, they would be measuring wheel horsepower, then using some assumed conversion factor to convert the wheel hp to flywheel hp, right? If that's what they did, could you find out what the conversion factor is that they used? Then I can get back to wheel hp with it.
Thanks
Just for having a comparison data i can tell that, as average, stock evo form 6 to 8 show about 215/218 hp at the wheels, 9 GSR about 210 and 9 rs about 220, on this dyno....
Trending Topics
#11
The car runs with a full Fujitsubo RM-01 exhaust system, no cats, 1150 injectors, aem series 2 ecu with map conversion.
In my opinion, again, the bottle neck is the exhaust housing design, especially regarding the retarded spool, as regards power, considering the relatively low boost and the 93 oct fuel is not that bad, on a more aggressive timing map, with a little more boost 550 hp are a realistic goal.....
In my opinion, again, the bottle neck is the exhaust housing design, especially regarding the retarded spool, as regards power, considering the relatively low boost and the 93 oct fuel is not that bad, on a more aggressive timing map, with a little more boost 550 hp are a realistic goal.....
#12
Newbie
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The car runs with a full Fujitsubo RM-01 exhaust system, no cats, 1150 injectors, aem series 2 ecu with map conversion.
In my opinion, again, the bottle neck is the exhaust housing design, especially regarding the retarded spool, as regards power, considering the relatively low boost and the 93 oct fuel is not that bad, on a more aggressive timing map, with a little more boost 550 hp are a realistic goal.....
In my opinion, again, the bottle neck is the exhaust housing design, especially regarding the retarded spool, as regards power, considering the relatively low boost and the 93 oct fuel is not that bad, on a more aggressive timing map, with a little more boost 550 hp are a realistic goal.....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
simons3z
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
13
Feb 3, 2017 03:52 PM
Soshinoya
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
6
May 22, 2015 06:10 PM
jbkonis
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
29
Jun 10, 2014 01:51 PM
240Z TwinTurbo
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
49
Nov 10, 2013 09:55 PM