ETS twin-scroll 35r kit --->743hp,,, Spool inside
The bigger the better it seems.
Dec 21, 2012, 01:02 AM
#65
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Stockton, California
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmm.. what would be the difference from a t3 twin scroll and t4? shouldn't the t3 twin scroll spool faster with the smaller .78?? i hope it can sustain the same amount of power like the t4s since this is what i will be running(fp hta3582r twin scroll w/ polished comp)
Dec 21, 2012, 03:43 AM
#66
Dec 21, 2012, 07:34 AM
#67
Stay with T4. Don't be afraid of the "bigger number" it will only benafit your setup in twin scroll. Unless your looking for maximum spoolup but your gonna be completely dead up top and generating a lot of heat.
Dec 21, 2012, 08:46 AM
#68
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We picked up 6mph with a back-half switch-over. It picked up 55hp on pump and 70hp on race gas.
At 35 psi we broke the rear axle on the second pass with the "Do Work" Evo. She should be good for 150+ traps on kill mode. This car has the first "generation" long-tube ETS twin-scroll kit.
Last edited by E-SPEC INDUSTRIES; Dec 21, 2012 at 09:04 AM.
Dec 21, 2012, 09:47 AM
#69
You are "choking your chicken" ,,,, lol
We picked up 6mph with a back-half switch-over. It picked up 55hp on pump and 70hp on race gas.
At 35 psi we broke the rear axle on the second pass with the "Do Work" Evo. She should be good for 150+ traps on kill mode. This car has the first "generation" long-tube ETS twin-scroll kit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yYg1...F3rV_g&index=5
We picked up 6mph with a back-half switch-over. It picked up 55hp on pump and 70hp on race gas.
At 35 psi we broke the rear axle on the second pass with the "Do Work" Evo. She should be good for 150+ traps on kill mode. This car has the first "generation" long-tube ETS twin-scroll kit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yYg1...F3rV_g&index=5
Dec 22, 2012, 02:15 AM
#70
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Stockton, California
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the car will be also a DD
A T3 .78 on a 35r is possibly the worst turbine housing to use imo. It's much smaller then a T3 .63 non twin scroll housing.
Stay with T4. Don't be afraid of the "bigger number" it will only benafit your setup in twin scroll. Unless your looking for maximum spoolup but your gonna be completely dead up top and generating a lot of heat.
Stay with T4. Don't be afraid of the "bigger number" it will only benafit your setup in twin scroll. Unless your looking for maximum spoolup but your gonna be completely dead up top and generating a lot of heat.
Dec 22, 2012, 03:27 AM
#71
A T3 .78 on a 35r is possibly the worst turbine housing to use imo. It's much smaller then a T3 .63 non twin scroll housing.
Stay with T4. Don't be afraid of the "bigger number" it will only benafit your setup in twin scroll. Unless your looking for maximum spoolup but your gonna be completely dead up top and generating a lot of heat.
Stay with T4. Don't be afraid of the "bigger number" it will only benafit your setup in twin scroll. Unless your looking for maximum spoolup but your gonna be completely dead up top and generating a lot of heat.
Will be better for spool and power use a hta 86 in 1.06 t4 ts ? any ad/disadvantages to use hta 86 1.06 a/r instead of 6262 0.84 t4 ts on same car ?
Thanks.
Dec 22, 2012, 04:52 AM
#72
So is mine. What does that matter?
I believe the .84 housing is just to small. You ell Spool up fast yes but your topend will suffer greatly. Both the 6262 and HTA have a 62mm turbine. Your going to choke the crap out of it. And if you plan to push it to its limits then your asking for even more problems. I ran every turbo I listed on a stock engine except the HTA86 and the 6466. My engine spit a rod just driving down the highway at 55 mph. I was just driving like a normal person to so I can't say its bad for a stock engine setup. But why would it be?
My 6466 with 1.15 and STM 650 cams spools up actually the same as my HTA 1.06 with smaller BR BF-272 cams. The 6466 is making 140 more hp the the HTA did.
nd no one and I mean no one should ever use the ATP T4 1.06. Been there on 3 of them. There junk. Use a garrett 1.00 or any PTE housing.
So you think going on stock block ,using fullrace t4 ts kit,with a 0.84a/r t4 twinscroll housing 6262 turbo is not a good choice?
Will be better for spool and power use a hta 86 in 1.06 t4 ts ? any ad/disadvantages to use hta 86 1.06 a/r instead of 6262 0.84 t4 ts on same car ?
Thanks.
Will be better for spool and power use a hta 86 in 1.06 t4 ts ? any ad/disadvantages to use hta 86 1.06 a/r instead of 6262 0.84 t4 ts on same car ?
Thanks.
My 6466 with 1.15 and STM 650 cams spools up actually the same as my HTA 1.06 with smaller BR BF-272 cams. The 6466 is making 140 more hp the the HTA did.
nd no one and I mean no one should ever use the ATP T4 1.06. Been there on 3 of them. There junk. Use a garrett 1.00 or any PTE housing.
Dec 22, 2012, 07:30 AM
#73
So is mine. What does that matter?
I believe the .84 housing is just to small. You ell Spool up fast yes but your topend will suffer greatly. Both the 6262 and HTA have a 62mm turbine. Your going to choke the crap out of it. And if you plan to push it to its limits then your asking for even more problems. I ran every turbo I listed on a stock engine except the HTA86 and the 6466. My engine spit a rod just driving down the highway at 55 mph. I was just driving like a normal person to so I can't say its bad for a stock engine setup. But why would it be?
My 6466 with 1.15 and STM 650 cams spools up actually the same as my HTA 1.06 with smaller BR BF-272 cams. The 6466 is making 140 more hp the the HTA did.
nd no one and I mean no one should ever use the ATP T4 1.06. Been there on 3 of them. There junk. Use a garrett 1.00 or any PTE housing.
I believe the .84 housing is just to small. You ell Spool up fast yes but your topend will suffer greatly. Both the 6262 and HTA have a 62mm turbine. Your going to choke the crap out of it. And if you plan to push it to its limits then your asking for even more problems. I ran every turbo I listed on a stock engine except the HTA86 and the 6466. My engine spit a rod just driving down the highway at 55 mph. I was just driving like a normal person to so I can't say its bad for a stock engine setup. But why would it be?
My 6466 with 1.15 and STM 650 cams spools up actually the same as my HTA 1.06 with smaller BR BF-272 cams. The 6466 is making 140 more hp the the HTA did.
nd no one and I mean no one should ever use the ATP T4 1.06. Been there on 3 of them. There junk. Use a garrett 1.00 or any PTE housing.
Dec 22, 2012, 09:24 AM
#74
I have no experience with a 6262. So your best best is to look for someone who does. Ask them what turbo spools up quicker in the same turbine housing sizes. I think from quick reading the HTA spools slower but does make more power up top when both turbos are pushed hard.
Yes I think either turbo on 93 Oct is fine for the stock block. But with using them turbos don't expect a stock block to last forever.
