EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Evo 9 with Buschur 2.3 RPM and FP Black

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 9, 2012, 08:10 PM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Broham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: va
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
THiis will break 600 easy. youll need new tires every week with that torque!!
Broham is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 10, 2012, 11:12 AM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
project_skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Trini7
Yes. It's quite impressive. And it still has a lot more in it as this tune was quite conservative.
But the response is oh so lovely. Lol.
Built motor, Q-16 and conservative? That sounds like an oxy-moron.

Give it moar!
project_skyline is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 10, 2012, 11:30 AM
  #18  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Josh@Spec-Ops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Fayetteville,NC
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by project_skyline
Built motor, Q-16 and conservative? That sounds like an oxy-moron.

Give it moar!
Agreed, I do see it has to be real conservative, why not just tune on 93?
Josh@Spec-Ops is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 10, 2012, 11:39 AM
  #19  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,299
Received 67 Likes on 59 Posts
32psi and that hp/tq is not conservative timing.. its probably where it should be. the race fuel is being utilized in the timing.
tscompusa is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 10, 2012, 11:48 AM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (50)
 
High_PSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,101
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
WOW toque, I would have thought at least 600 WHP on a Dyno Jet. Still an amazing car.
High_PSI is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 10, 2012, 06:30 PM
  #21  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
GTijoejoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
I like!!!!
GTijoejoe is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 11, 2012, 05:38 AM
  #22  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
bbyevo8u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
nice.. why was the pull cut short?
bbyevo8u is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 11, 2012, 10:12 AM
  #23  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
metalsaber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Sticks
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bbyevo8u
nice.. why was the pull cut short?
Why rev to 8500 when the peak power/torque is long since passed?

Just an FYI, when David tuned my 2.3L and FP black he only went to 7500.
metalsaber is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 11, 2012, 01:31 PM
  #24  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Trini7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Trinidad in the Caribbean
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just keeping it in the power band. Car will be used mainly for autocross type events. Rev limit is set at 8000.
With some cleaning up we will hit 600.
It was a late night so we stopped at 584.
In two weeks we should be back on the dyno.
Trini7 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 11, 2012, 01:32 PM
  #25  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Trini7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Trinidad in the Caribbean
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
However to me torque and response is more important than whp.
Trini7 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 11, 2012, 01:39 PM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
metalsaber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Sticks
Posts: 1,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Trini7
However to me torque and response is more important than whp.
Definitely for autox.
metalsaber is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 11, 2012, 02:25 PM
  #27  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
kouzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With this torque it will be a handful to drive in autocross!

I autocross my NA 997.2 and I can't imagine having so much turbo torque hitting in 2nd gear!

Enjoy it!
kouzman is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 11, 2012, 02:56 PM
  #28  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Trini7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Trinidad in the Caribbean
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In all the excitement, I forgot to thank:
Buschur Racing for building a kick *** engine
Mike @ AWD Motorsports for supplying such a kick *** engine and cams and turbo etc.
The car feels awesome. Scary. Lol.
Buschur Racing and AWD Motorsports, quality products from quality companies and quality people.
Also a very big thanks to my tuner Mr. Richard "Dry" Williams
Last edited by Trini7; Apr 13, 2012 at 04:56 PM.
Trini7 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 13, 2012, 06:17 AM
  #29  
Newbie
 
spoilboy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was the idc on those id1000's
spoilboy1 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Apr 13, 2012, 07:20 AM
  #30  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
evo 9 guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Out of curiosity, what made you go with the 2.3 RPM if you are going to stick with 8000 RPM and under? I only ask because the extra cost seems to be negated since the standard 2.3 is rated for 8500.
evo 9 guy is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Evo 9 with Buschur 2.3 RPM and FP Black


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:00 PM.